Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WILL HILLARY CLINTON RUN? COMBINATORIAL GAME THEORY MAY PROVIDE THE ANSWER
hillary clinton, bill clinton | 11.28.06 | Mia T

Posted on 11/27/2006 11:18:50 PM PST by Mia T

WILL HILLARY CLINTON RUN?
COMBINATORIAL GAME THEORY MAY PROVIDE THE ANSWER

by Mia T, 11.28.06

 

 

 


Hillary-the-person isn't running. The idea of hillary is, the idea of hillary as put out on a daily basis by all manner of proxy, from simple spinner to elaborate Hollywood production.

QUESTION: When was the last time you observed "the smartest woman in the world" partake in our process of political discourse, or, as Charles Kuralt once put it, relish in "the raucous give and take of American democracy?" ANSWER: Never. Hillary-the-person answers to no one....

The upshot of all this vacuity are positive numbers for hillary (such as they are) that are inversely related to appearance frequency, and, more specifically, inversely related to the following mouth variables....

The bottom line is this paradox: In order for hillary clinton to have any chance of winning elections, she must all but vanish from the public stage.

Mia T, 3.22.06
SEX, LIES AND SOCK PUPPETS:
HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR
4







n combinatorial game theory, a "misère play condition" is one in which the player unable to move wins. (In the "normal play condition," the player unable to move loses.)

Missus clinton, prisoner of her own ineptitude, repulsiveness and criminality, is in a state of perpetual misère: She must remain immobil, hidden, mute.

Her head bobbed nonstop in servile compliance.... Her gaze was fawning, fixed on him.... Her mouth was frozen shut, corners upturned a carefully calibrated nine degrees above the horizontal.... Not a smile.... (Never a smile).... Just enough of an upturn to hide the always-present anger. His sock puppet was on display.... Finally....

Mia T, , 03.18.06
THREE WOMEN AND A FUNERAL:
HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR
3

 

Will she run?

Missus clinton's most critical calculation will be whether she is going to be allowed to remain a stealth candidate.

Will her fraudulent virtual-ubiquity via ads, Hollywood productions, programmed softball interviews, head-bobbing "listening-tour" photo-ops, etc.) while hiding in real time --her "misère play condition," if you will--continue to satisfy the entrenched power in DC?

More important, will it play in Peoria after we expose it for the fraud that it is?


December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton



Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006

 

'HIATUS' FOR HILLARY?
by Mia T, 02.02.06

The clintons, as is their wont, are now taking this proxy scheme to even more outrageous extremes.

The latest: an actual hillary clinton proxy presidency, populated on both sides of the camera by assorted rodham and clinton ex-staffers, sycophants and should-be felons, witness the latest hire.

'Commander-in-Chief,' a show that sets out to crown a 'queen,' instead exposes the kitschy simplemindedness of Hollywood fantasy and the special sway and shortsightedness of the pathologic ego.


Mia T, 10.27.05
THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY
Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy
(clip included)



unning vicariously, as we have argued, has its risks.

What was supposed to be Hollywood propaganda to make a hillary presidency marginally palatable has instead become a parable about missus clinton's own dystopian future.

ABC announced the other day that it is pulling "Commander-in-Chief" off the air "until spring." Missus clinton's proxy presidency, you see, has been in a ratings free fall ever since "American Idol" took it on.

In a perverse life-mirrors-art moment, support for the real-life missus clinton's presidency has plummeted, too. This even sans Rudy, her real-life "American Idol" opponent.

'Ars artia gratis.' Please!

Samuel Goldwyn must be turning over in his grave....

 

 

READ MORE

THE HILLARY, YOU KNOW, CLINTON TRANSCRIPT:
Analyzed and Annotated

 

by Mia T
January 22, 2002

 

 

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE [YOU KNOW] 'UPDATED'


 

ABSTRACT

Background:

Using internal polling, the clinton 'infrastructure' determined that its cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes/King-kind-scheme is no longer working. The scheme, which successfully shepherded and shielded the vacuous, inept, corrupt clintons for nine years, is now, post-9/11, yielding diminishing returns--and worse--increasing ridicule.

Hence, we had the clinton 'infrastructure' interviewer recalculation last week that specified more interviewer gravitas...and less lapdog...but not more doggedness...that is to say...that specified Jeff Greenfield.

A miscalculation, as it turned out. Greenfield made up in contempt what he lacked in inexorability. Although he conducted the entire interview circumambulating on eggshells, Greenfield did eventually ask the hard-boiled questions...

ASIDE: The tough questioning was followed by Greenfield's sudden, post-interview departure from CNN, a development which will only further reinforce cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes/King-kind 4th-estate malfeasance.

 

Analysis:

Greenfield's circuitous path to clinton depravity and failure necessitates a nonlinear analysis of the data; we will use a least squares curve fitter. Proportional hazards political survival regression analysis will generate a political survival curve for hillary clinton, which will show her viability (so to speak) over time.

Political survival time is defined as the length of the interval between the initial political trial balloon and political moribundity. Political moribundity is defined as two consecutive political failures--(one in the case of 9/11), or three not-necessarily-consecutive boo-filled public appearances, or one instance of a serious proposal generating laughter.

ASIDE: Since by any of these standards, hillary clinton is already flatlined, the more interesting question for this analysis would be: "What the hell is this moribund loser doing in the political arena, anyway?"

Survival is influenced by one or more factors, called "predictors" or "covariates", which may be categorical (such as the quality of 'infrastructure') or continuous (such as intellect or eloquence or character).

Results:

  • clinton rigor mortis rendered any discussion of clinton moribundity moot.

  • Nonetheless, one of the more significant continuous predictors of political moribundity is clinton's tic-like insertion of "you know," a marker for ineloquence, vulgarity, ignorance, rube-meets-valley-girl demographics, low self-esteem, anxiety and insincerity.

  • clinton uttered "you know" 52 times. Greenfield eventually caught the bug and uttered six "you knows" himself--a cautionary tale for wannabe clintonoid lapdogs.

  • Frequency of clinton "you knows" varied directly with intensity of Greenfield contempt and inversely with magnitude of Greenfield softballs.

  • clinton response is consistent with nascent coup d'état. See "The Daschle Scheme".

 

GREENFIELD: Tonight, a conversation with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on the nation and the world after September 11, on GREENFIELD AT LARGE.

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006

 

 


A HILLARY 'LANDSLIDE'???
NOT SO FAST, MISSUS CLINTON....

 

 

by Mia T, 11.12.06


I just received the following wire from my generous Daddy___"Dear Jack, Don't buy a single vote more than is necessary. I'll be damned if I'm going to pay for a landslide."

John Fitzgerald Kennedy


 

Nixon had three goals: to win by the biggest electoral landslide in history; to be remembered as a peacemaker; and to be accepted by the "Establishment" as an equal. He achieved all these objectives at the end of 1972 and the beginning of 1973. And he lost them all two months later___partly because he turned a dream into an obsession.

Henry Kissinger






issus clinton ran for reelection against an unfunded* third-stringer with zero name recognition; that is to say, she ran virtually unopposed.

Such conditions, irrespective of vote tally, can never a 'landslide' make.
(ASIDE: That missus clinton has never been tested should concern all Democrats.)
1

Nonetheless, missus clinton dumped 30-million-dollars' worth of false advertising 2 into the race: Standard-issue clinton sleight-of-hand intended to transmute:

  • hillary-dross 3 into gold (or at least into more 'plans' 11),

  • real-time hillary-hiding into virtual hillary-ubiquity, 4

  • hillary-abhorrence 5 into a measurable-if-hold-your-nose-variety hillary-nod.

 

The purpose of the 30-million-dollar demagogic infusion was to create the illusion of a landslide in New York in '06, which would, (so the wishful thinking goes), create the illusion of national electability in '08, an absolute prerequisite to nomination for someone with a Q Score as wanting as missus clinton's. 6

 

FUZZY MATH AT THE NEW YORK TIMES

The official New York State Board of Elections tally will not be available until mid-December, a sufficient time lag for Pinch and Company 7 to exaggerate the significance of the hillary vote and for the mischaracterization to become firmly fixed in our collective 'history.' Truth and America matter not at all to The New York Times. Agenda is everything. 8 The Times' clinton endorsements redux. 9

Senator Clinton led her opponent, John Spencer, by 67 to 31 percent....
She also won two-thirds of the male voters and three-quarters of female voters.

Patrick Healy
The New York Times
November 8, 2006

If missus clinton won two-thirds of the total vote and two-thirds of the male vote, she could not have won three-quarters of female vote unless the total female vote was at or about zero. Similarly, if she won two-thirds of the total vote and three-quarters of female vote, she could not have won two-thirds of the male vote.


SPITZER'S ZIPPER

For her entire adult (such as it is) life, zipper-hoisting has been missus clinton's principal means of upward mobility. 10 This election was no different.

Zipper-hoisting has, in the past, proven to be a sticky wicket for missus clinton, owing not to antithetical feminist ideology, as one would expect -- feminists willingly sacrificed feminism on the altar of clintonism -- but to zipper choice, her rather injudicious attachment early on to a certain zipper habitually on the downslide.

This time she picked zippers a bit better, glomming onto Eliot's.

Contrary to 'conventional wisdom,' the coattails (if you'll pardon the mixed metaphor) were Eliot's, not hers. The three percent who voted for Spitzer who could not overcome their revulsion to pull the lever for hillary tell it all.




* Spencer is, far and away, the landslide winner if the results are weighted for the cost per vote.



COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006



TOP 10 REASONS TO DUMP HILLARY CLINTON ON NOVEMBER 7
(And she thinks New Yorkers should return her to office why?)


by Mia T, 11.06.06



10.

If you are an unemployed New Yorker, the sure-fire way to remain jobless is to re-elect missus clinton.


Hillary's 'serious plan' in 2000 has become hillary's serious failure in 2006.

The 200,000 new jobs missus clinton pledged to create in depressed Upstate became under her tenure a 75,000-job LOSS.

(In contrast, her opponent, John Spencer, has a
proven record creating jobs.)

9.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.


Incredibly, hillary clinton is now asking New Yorkers to return her to office why?
Because
she 'has plans,' would you believe?!

 

HILLARY'S 'PLANS' (A DEBATE VIGNETTE), by Mia T, 10.28.06

 

 

 

8.

Missus clinton's only 'plan,' insofar as we can tell, is to run for president.


When asked about her plan to run for president, missus clinton said the voters should 'factor in' that possibility.

We agree.

Missus clinton certainly factors into her job description her self-serving presidential schemes, frittering away time and energy out on the hustings and votes against New York interests on the Senate floor.


7.

'Knownothing-Victim' and 'Failure' are missus clinton's middle names.




 

My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.... there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president.

J. Bradford DeLong
professor of economics, Berkeley
clinton Administration veteran
"Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far
away from the White House for the rest of her life."






 

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)

6.

... And the corollary: Zipper-hoisting has been missus clinton's only means of upward mobility



For her entire adult (such as it is) life, zipper-hoisting has been missus clinton's principal means of upward mobility.

Zipper-hoisting has proved to be a sticky wicket for missus clinton, owing not to antithetical feminist ideology, as one would expect -- feminists willingly sacrificed feminism on the altar of clintonism -- but to zipper choice, her rather injudicious attachment early on to a certain zipper habitually on the downslide.

Mia T
DEEP VEEP
3.06.04

 


Thank you, Gavin McNett, for your tribute to the incomparable Tammy Wynette. (TAMMY WYNETTE, 1942-1998)

Too many pundits, usually leftist and privileged, sneer at country music. To these critics, any music created by poor, Southern whites (at least those poor, Southern whites who didn't attend an Ivy League university) must be held in contempt, along with its correlatives: incest, racism and trailer parks.

Hillary Clinton? Who would even know her name were it not for her attachment to a man? Where would she be now if she as a child had to pick cotton from sun up to sun down?

Tammy Wynette stands alone, a legend; and she will be admired wherever people appreciate the honesty of the human experience. Human beings are vulnerable. We all should be thankful to any artist courageous enough to bare her soul on the public stage so the rest of us who are listening and know whereof she speaks might benefit.

Sean Smith
Fresno, Calif.
Salon.com



5.

If you are a hit-on-by-a-clinton-one-too-many-times New York swell, you can rid yourself finally of these two schnorrers and protect your gelt at the same time by electing John Spencer.


THE RUBES' GOLDBERG MACHINE
A STATE OF PERPETUAL CLINTON BEGGARY
by Mia T, 10.31.06
(BASED ON THE RUBE GOLDBERG MACHINE 3)


4.
You need a 'new direction' from what has been euphemistically dubbed 'clinton fatigue.'


 

3.

They took the village.* You want it back.



* thanx to Gail Wynand for the turn of phrase

 


 


2.

Cattle futures were the future.






1.

Let down the curtain: the farce is done. (Rabelais)


These are serious times, folks....
They demand
serious people of exceptional accomplishment and character.

 



 

 

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006

 





COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006



TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: congress; corruption; elections; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-85 next last

1 posted on 11/27/2006 11:18:53 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

ping


2 posted on 11/27/2006 11:22:46 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Well done, Mia; as always!

And yes, that IS the conundrum...Hillary is a terrible candidate. She won the Senate seat by stealth and fraud. But running for the presidency is NOTHING like anything else and she knows that. She also has NEVER really taken a chance on ANYTHING, lately, where she can lose and she really can't play hid-and-seek, as the presidential candidate.

Can she win the Dem primary as the stealth candidate? Maybe; but, it depends a great deal upon who else is in that race. Can she do it if Gore is in that mix? No, I don't think so.

3 posted on 11/27/2006 11:26:32 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Lonesome in Massachussets; yoe; YaYa123; joanie-f; ...

ping


4 posted on 11/27/2006 11:26:33 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

A classic approach-avoidance conflict. She can taste the power and glory. But she knows there is no way she can handle the scrutiny.


5 posted on 11/27/2006 11:35:21 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Mia T

Fascinating,...will be back tomorrow for another... read in depth....nite.


7 posted on 11/27/2006 11:39:25 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

<< Missus clinton, prisoner of her own ineptitude, repulsiveness and criminality, is in a state of perpetual misère: She must remain immobil, hidden, mute. >>

Missus clinton, who has already ridden zippers higher than has any other woman in the entire Human experience but who has also never held an independent job, never been responsible to a profit nor ever met a payroll, will never again be elected to public office.


8 posted on 11/27/2006 11:42:18 PM PST by Brian Allen ("Moral issues are always terribly complex, for someone without principles." - G K Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ironpuppy

Dunno. Are you? ;)


9 posted on 11/27/2006 11:42:36 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thanks, Ernest. :)


10 posted on 11/27/2006 11:43:20 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

bump.

If she continues to run unopposed, NY seems more than willing to return her to office. A la Ted Kennedy. How fitting.


11 posted on 11/27/2006 11:57:14 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

CORRECTION:
should be 'immobile.'


12 posted on 11/28/2006 12:00:50 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Exactly so! This should prove to be interesting.

I wonder what she WILL actually do.

13 posted on 11/28/2006 12:02:30 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Pundits are confusing this approach-avoidance conflict with coyness.


14 posted on 11/28/2006 12:08:41 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Because they don't want to admit the truth about Hillary; though it stares them in the face daily.

My husband still thinks that she will NOT enter the primary. Me? I don't know, but IF Gore enters, for real, I think that she may not.

15 posted on 11/28/2006 12:13:08 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

You are right. Susan Page was on C-SPAN the other day claiming that hillary clinton had already been vetted. A Republican caller quickly dispelled that laughable notion, as well as another--that she has commander-in-chief experience. Page was pathetic.


16 posted on 11/28/2006 12:19:42 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

When has Susan Page NOT been pathetic? ;^)


17 posted on 11/28/2006 12:21:51 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Touché


18 posted on 11/28/2006 12:23:13 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

:-)


19 posted on 11/28/2006 12:25:22 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

thanks :)


20 posted on 11/28/2006 12:34:10 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand

ping


21 posted on 11/28/2006 12:37:21 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UWSrepublican

ping


22 posted on 11/28/2006 12:41:13 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie

ping


23 posted on 11/28/2006 12:41:55 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
Mrs. Clinton has held positions outside the government.

Does the Rose Law Firm come to mind?
24 posted on 11/28/2006 1:50:35 AM PST by Coldwater Creek (The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Smart man, your husband!! The Hildabeast won't run.


25 posted on 11/28/2006 1:51:59 AM PST by Coldwater Creek (The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

My husband is brilliant; thanks for noticing. :-)


26 posted on 11/28/2006 1:54:55 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
On another thread yesterday, a young unmarried woman had the idea that husbands were not a gift from God. She thinks that having a MBA was the best thing in life for her.

What a fool!
27 posted on 11/28/2006 2:11:02 AM PST by Coldwater Creek (The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
What a MORON!

What's wrong with having both?

But, between the two, I'd take a good husband, any day and though not an MBA, I do have a Masters degree!

28 posted on 11/28/2006 2:16:00 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Greenfield's circuitous path to clinton depravity and failure necessitates a nonlinear analysis of the data; we will use a least squares curve fitter.

Ha!

My own Monte Carlo model using only 13 variables shows that multivariate analysis is more than adequate to predict the following:

Ms. Clinton is not Mr. Mondale. We don't have the Gipper, and thus, we don't have a good enough reason to have a great bonfire of Deomcratic dollars.

The ONLY reason to nominate her is to get the precedent set of nominating a woman from one of the major parties. She is quite unelectable, so what this means is that a sure win Republican nominee would have to appear. And that is just not possible in this Gipperless year.

Therefore, it will be a democratic man that is the nominee, and it will be someone Bill annoints, not Hillary. Here's a good question: just what men, for a change, does the MSM report Big Bill is being seen with?

Democratic money though seen as confetti, isn't, and won't be thrown away on her. At best, she wins a couple of primaries, but then she gets torpedoed by the MSM in a spectacular fashion if she doesn't back down.

But, she will back down, as she did when she sold her soul to her husband, way back in those classroom days at Yale. It will be an adequate excuse too: "My Mom is too sick, my daughter needs me," etc, etc"....

29 posted on 11/28/2006 2:26:42 AM PST by gobucks (Blissful Marriage: A result of a worldly husband's transformation into the Word's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ironpuppy

Maybe, but Mia sure knows her stuff.
This sin't the 1st time Mia t has nailed Mrs. Clinton and done it well.


30 posted on 11/28/2006 2:34:14 AM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

BTTT


31 posted on 11/28/2006 2:56:02 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Great job!

Was Jeff Greenfield really fired from CNN?


32 posted on 11/28/2006 3:03:58 AM PST by Cincinna (HILLARY & HER HINO " We are going to take things away from you for the Common Good ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


33 posted on 11/28/2006 4:20:00 AM PST by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gobucks
My own Monte Carlo model using only 13 variables shows that multivariate analysis is more than adequate to predict the following....--gobucks


Your Monte Carlo simulation to iteratively evaluate the seemingly deterministic 'hillary-run' model by using sets of random inputs is quite brilliant; it is, indeed, the method of choice when the model is complex, nonlinear, or involves more than just a few uncertain parameters.

Your simulation will likely involve over 104 evaluations of the model. I take it you have a decent computer.

By using random inputs, you have essentially turned the seemingly deterministic 'hillary-run' model into one that is stochastic. Bravo!

The ONLY reason to nominate her is to get the precedent set of nominating a woman from one of the major parties. She is quite unelectable, so what this means is that a sure win Republican nominee would have to appear. And that is just not possible in this Gipperless year.

Therefore, it will be a democratic man that is the nominee....--Ibid.

Missus clinton's elbowing and jackbooting and moneygrubbing her way to the nomination at a time when NO woman is electable confirms yet again the self-serving danger of the clintons.

 
It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)


34 posted on 11/28/2006 5:56:23 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Cincinna

He was MIA henceforth and forevermore. Don't think he was technically fired, tho.


35 posted on 11/28/2006 6:03:08 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: E.G.C.

thanx, E.G.C. :)


36 posted on 11/28/2006 6:08:11 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

ping


37 posted on 11/28/2006 6:12:43 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yoe

ping


38 posted on 11/28/2006 6:19:49 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I will always hold it against Rudy that he did not run against Hillary this time. He could have done his party, his state and his country a GREAT SERVICE by removing her from the senate on November 7th.

If he had run and defeated her--he would have:
1. Kept control of the Senate for the Republicans,

2. While proving his electability for a Presidential run in two years, and

3. Most importantly, removed Hillary from Presidential contention.

He had a chance to hit a 'home run' where they know him best, where they love him, and where his liberal leanings are much more in-tune with the electorate--and he chose not to.

39 posted on 11/28/2006 6:21:09 AM PST by stockstrader ("Where government advances--and it advances relentlessly--freedom is imperiled"-Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand

fyi


40 posted on 11/28/2006 6:22:16 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Point well-taken, altho I am sympathetic to Rudy's thinking here, i.e., running for senator (1) would put his presidential run at risk, and (2), would be a step down.


41 posted on 11/28/2006 6:33:56 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Fact 1: The Republicans do not have a clear, strong candidate that can effectively use a Reagan strategy to go over the heads of the MSM. Guiliani does not appeal to many conservatives despite his impressive record in combating crime and dealing with the immediate aftermath of 9/11. Essentially, a candidate must emerge soon in order to capture enough mind share over the next two years.

Fact 2: If she runs, the MSM will form a gauntlet around Hillary unlike anything we have ever seen. The smallest Republican misstep will be endlessly repeated while the largest Democrat scandal will be buried. We have not yet seen the lengths the MSM will go to to guarantee a Democrat victory. The argument is always made - Hillary will be shown in public forums and debates as the shrewish lier and Machiavellian power-mad dominatrix she is. I don't buy that. If she runs, she will be stage managed in such a way that will make Mother Teressa look like Barbra Streisand.

42 posted on 11/28/2006 6:34:30 AM PST by ZeitgeistSurfer (The Democrats solution is poison. When the patient is dying, their solution - more poison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZeitgeistSurfer

True... but there isn't a gauntlet large enough to cover her--if you'll pardon the mixed metaphor--baggage. The opposition will make the swiftboating of Kerry look like sandbox play.

In the end, she will be the agent of her own demise. (If she runs, she will, perforce, have to open her mouth.)

As for Giuliani, his strength is precisely that his appeal transcends party.

If missus clinton runs, and if Giuliani is the GOP candidate, conservatives, I believe, will be wise enough this time not to place a de facto vote for a clinton.

Their challenge in both the nominating process and the general election will be to put America's security ahead of doctrinal purity.


43 posted on 11/28/2006 7:10:51 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
"I take it you have a decent computer."

Oh I how wish that were true..

One Caveat to my analysis, however, is this: if she decides to take up golf. Hillary as a scatch golfer ... well, my model cannot account for that variable - I would probably have to construct a finite element model, but my competencies there ... well, they are not good. :)

44 posted on 11/28/2006 7:12:48 AM PST by gobucks (Blissful Marriage: A result of a worldly husband's transformation into the Word's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: gobucks

No doubt--golf is the subtext.
A confounding variable, and one of the goals of this arrogant power grab, is the clinton mulligan. ;)

... which brings us back to the fundamental question: Why would anyone want a clinton back in the White House?

 


45 posted on 11/28/2006 7:38:06 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand

FYI


46 posted on 11/28/2006 7:48:17 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Any teeing off lately in Chappaqua and environs?


47 posted on 11/28/2006 7:54:32 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

She can run, but won't be able to hide. :)

Hope you had a great holiday Mia.


48 posted on 11/28/2006 7:56:03 AM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

touché and thanx.

hope your holiday was great, too. :)


49 posted on 11/28/2006 8:00:20 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I ate the turkey, but was not a turkey...
Thank you very much! :-)

Got to go, thanks.


50 posted on 11/28/2006 8:01:39 AM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson