Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq had WMDs after all
Waterbury Republican-American ^ | November 29, 2006 | Editorial

Posted on 11/29/2006 9:10:21 AM PST by Graybeard58

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Graybeard58

One national security think tank believed that Saddam had outsourced his nuclear program, sending money and technicians to Libya, since Iraq had been crawling with UN inspectors. Of course, Libya gave up their nuclear program, which means that what they were abandoning was their cooperation in Saddam's program. And with Saddam deposed, the program couldn't go on any longer anyway.


21 posted on 11/29/2006 10:08:46 AM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

bump for later


22 posted on 11/29/2006 10:10:43 AM PST by quikdrw (Life is tough....it's even tougher if you are stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

The information contradicting the "conventional wisdom" of the MSM on Saddam's WMD is out there for anyone to see, but it takes some effort to put the entire picture together. I blame the Administration for doing a horrible job in presenting the full picture of Saddam's WMD program circa 2002 to the American people. When the Iraq Survey Group concluded that there were no stockpiles of WMDs, hence no evidence of an ongoing program, the Administration shrugged its collective shoulders and said, essentially, "Opps."


23 posted on 11/29/2006 10:12:06 AM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

It is sickening.


24 posted on 11/29/2006 10:14:34 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

Their post-invasion public relations has been pathetic. It's sad that we've reached the point we are at today.


25 posted on 11/29/2006 10:17:22 AM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xenophiles

Sept 1998: Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
Sen McCain: "Mr Ritter, is it true that UNSCOM has intelligence that states Iraq has three Nuclear Weapons Assemblies but lacks only the fissile material to make them operative?"
Scott Ritter: "Yes".


26 posted on 11/29/2006 10:17:45 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Now all you have to do is prove it to the new legislature's satisfaction.


27 posted on 11/29/2006 10:18:16 AM PST by Logic n' Reason (Don't piss down my back and tell me it's rainin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Maybe Michelle Malkin from the Hartford Courant will pick this up?

Or Mary McCrory?

How About Colin Macinroe from WTIC-AM??

Surely Diane Smith from Positively Connecticut will speak of this with Ray Dunaway??

...(groan)....


28 posted on 11/29/2006 10:23:51 AM PST by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper; justshutupandtakeit

In 2004, I started collecting public reports, readily available on the Internet, verifying the existence of Saddam's WMD program. I'd collected numerous bits of information, but largely gave up the project because I'd come to the conclusion -- why should I knock myself out trying to defend the Administration's original intention in invading Iraq to take-out Saddam's WMD capability, when the Administration wasn't bothering to defend itself? It is sickening, and it is the greatest mystery in this whole Iraq operation.


29 posted on 11/29/2006 10:27:51 AM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Very interesting.


30 posted on 11/29/2006 10:29:49 AM PST by Chewie84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

Many of us are aware of the dozens, if not hundreds, of reports from the major media throughout the 90s specifying the danger Saddam posed. It was hysterical about the prospect of al queda linking up with Saddam. It revealed his Salman Pak terrorist training center complete with airliner for practice. Clinton bombed Iraq in 98 claiming he was hitting Saddam's NBC factories and sites. Cohen and Dick Clarke claimed the Sudanese pharmacuetical plant was part of Saddam's weapons system.

Since Bush decided to actually DO something about it all has disappeared down the Memory Hole. But WE still remember.


31 posted on 11/29/2006 10:32:49 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

They also had chem and bio weapons. But no one in the MSM wants to talk about it.


32 posted on 11/29/2006 10:37:54 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

Precisely. This is why I consider the left in this country *evil* -- they conveniently forget what was considered solid evidence during the Clinton era, simply for the sake of gaining some political advantage over a Republican President. But, again, the real fault lies with the Administration which went to war to deny Saddam, and ultimately al Qaeda, access to WMDs, and then has done nothing to back-up its original claims, and has done nothing to refute the constant drumbeat for the last three years on the left that "Bush lied, people died."


33 posted on 11/29/2006 10:51:25 AM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

bump


34 posted on 11/29/2006 12:50:04 PM PST by JerseyJohn61 (Better Late Than Never.......sometimes over lapping is worth the effort....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

why should I knock myself out trying to defend the Administration's original intention in invading Iraq to take-out Saddam's WMD capability, when the Administration wasn't bothering to defend itself? It is sickening, and it is the greatest mystery in this whole Iraq operation.

It's almost as if the Bush administration has been working for the Dems.


35 posted on 11/29/2006 1:19:34 PM PST by freedomfiter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2
........the Administration wasn't bothering to defend itself? It is sickening, and it is the greatest mystery in this whole Iraq operation....

Bush: Not a bad President at all, but an incompetent communicator who has done a great deal of harm to his party, and has absolutely sacrificed many of those who still wish him well.

We still wish him well because it's best for our country, but he surely doesn't make it easy... or pleasant.

36 posted on 11/29/2006 3:02:57 PM PST by Kenny Bunk (Let us all gather together on the lawn to bid Karl Rove a fond "Adios, Amigo!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2

One begins to wonder.


37 posted on 11/29/2006 3:06:05 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Too late.

And besides, this administration has no desire to fight this issue.


38 posted on 11/29/2006 3:08:00 PM PST by airborne (MERRY CHRISTMAS!!! Jesus is the reason for the season!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

bump


39 posted on 11/29/2006 3:08:32 PM PST by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Well, well, well............ it's not news unless the MSM says so.

'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''


I view the MSM as an apolitical tool of whomever controls it. Presently, that happens to be the socialistic, liberal left. If the nation swings appreciably right, which appears to be the case, the MSM will reluctantly swing with it as it struggles to stay relevant. It's interesting to me that I have seen a number of conservatively written stories coming out of this Blue State publication in recent weeks. it might be a sign of the times. No pun intended (smile)

I don't think we should hate on their leftist ranting, I think we should take them over and turn them into conservative beacons of truth. They might even be able to turn a profit with capitalists running them.(smile)
40 posted on 11/29/2006 3:18:18 PM PST by photodawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson