Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: -YYZ-
The difference is that the manufacturers of ATMs and associated equipment are responsible to the banks for any problems that may arise

Look up Mr. Rifkin. Hell that wasn' even ATM software.

Plus, of course, if something does go wrong the bank will (eventually) take care of it for you. Is any of this true of voting machines?

You're implying that the bank will find it and an election board won't.

Is any of this true of voting machines?

No better, no worse, as I said in my original post.

39 posted on 11/29/2006 4:15:55 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (Difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic is that the Free Clinic knows how to stop a leak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Doctor Raoul

The 'voting' machines are much worse than ATMs. With ATMs there isn't just a receipt-printing system (those were outlawed on 'voting' systems in PA), there is also a complete and independently audited record system of currency, checks, and deposit slips.


66 posted on 11/30/2006 7:12:13 AM PST by lifelong_republican (Valid Elections: The Idea of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson