Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq, Iran reach agreement on security
AP ^ | November 29, 2006 | Nasser Karimi

Posted on 11/29/2006 8:28:12 PM PST by freedomdefender

Iraq's president said Wednesday he had reached a security agreement with Iran, which the United States accuses of fueling the chaos in the war-torn country. Iran's president called on countries to stop backing "terrorists" in Iraq and for the Americans to withdraw.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tehran is believed to back some of the Shiite militias blamed in the vicious sectarian killings that have thrown the country into chaos. The United States has said the Iraqi government should press Iran to stop interfering in its affairs in a bid to calm the violence.

Presidents Jalal Talabani of Iraq and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran held talks Wednesday hours before U.S. President George W. Bush was due to meet with the Iraqi prime minister in Jordan in talks aimed at finding a solution to Iraq's spiraling bloodshed.

Talabani gave no details on the security agreement with Iran, and Ahmadinejad made no mention of any deal at a joint press conference in Tehran.

"We discussed in the fields of security, economy, oil and industry. Our agreement was complete," Talabani told reporters. "This visit was 100 percent successful. Its result will appear soon."

It was not clear if Talabani's comments reflected an agreement by Tehran to try to rein in Shiite militias. Most of the militias are run by political parties that are a powerful part of the coalition government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. He has resisted U.S. pressure to crack down on the militias.

Ahmadinejad repeated his calls for the United States to withdraw its forces from Iraq.

"I advise you to leave Iraq," he said, addressing the Americans. "Based on a timetable, transfer the responsibilities to Iraqi government. This will agree to your interests, too."

He urged countries to stop backing militants in Iraq, saying, "supporting terrorists is the ugliest act that they can do." He did not specify which countries he was referring to.

Ahmadinejad said "extremists should be dismissed (from the Iraqi government) no matter to which group and ethnicity they belong to. This is the only way to salvation."

"Enemies of Iraq are trying to create differences and extend hostility among the Iraqi people," he said.

The United States accuses Iran and its ally Syria of stirring up violence in Iraq. Tehran denies this, saying it seeks calm in its neighbor and that an end to the bloodshed can only come when U.S. forces withdraw.

Al-Maliki and Talabani both have longtime ties with Iran. The Iraqi president has been in Iran the past three days, meeting Ahmadinejad and the country's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Talabani and Ahmadinejad attended a ceremony for the signing of two memorandums of understanding for cooperation in education and industry.

Ahmadinejad vowed that Iran "will stand by its Iraqi brothers," saying "no one can divide nations of Iran and Iraq."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: ugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 11/29/2006 8:28:14 PM PST by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Good. Glad that's all cleared up.


2 posted on 11/29/2006 8:29:13 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
Iran's president called on countries to stop backing "terrorists" in Iraq

Twilight Zone material.

3 posted on 11/29/2006 8:29:55 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

And to think our good soldiers gave their blood for this....a sell-out "leader" in Iraq. This is beyond comprehension.


4 posted on 11/29/2006 8:31:13 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

hmmm, obviously we can't trust him, or expect much, but this is a positive development.


5 posted on 11/29/2006 8:31:56 PM PST by stevestras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I agree. it makes me sick to my stomach.


6 posted on 11/29/2006 8:33:03 PM PST by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stevestras
this is a positive development.

Please explain why and how this is a "positive" development.

7 posted on 11/29/2006 8:33:49 PM PST by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

Good. Glad that's all cleared up.




Indeed.

And if anything goes wrong in Iraq, we have a pre-text to turn Iran into a landing strip.


8 posted on 11/29/2006 8:35:07 PM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

I'm afraid we won't be turning Iran into anything. "Engagment" is now the watchword. Of course we have no carrot or stick to offer Iran to make them stop meddling in Iraq (especially if we pull out troops) but that hasn't stopped the liberals or "realists" from insisting we go to them, hat in hand.


9 posted on 11/29/2006 8:40:16 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Perhaps it's more of a "this can't be bad" development.

But, you have a guy that has traditionally publicly called for terrorism, now denouncing it. You have Iraq and Iran seeming to take some responsibility for the violence. While remote, you also have a possible way out for the US.


10 posted on 11/29/2006 8:43:51 PM PST by stevestras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Ahmanutjob said: "supporting terrorists is the ugliest act that they can do."

Pot = Kettle = Black: Whow knew?


11 posted on 11/29/2006 8:48:08 PM PST by GLH3IL (Truth: The remedy for liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
Iraq's president said Wednesday he had reached a security agreement with Iran,

Iran will rule Iraq. The US can get out, but when the Iraqi killing starts, we'd better do nothing but watch. It's out of our hands once Iraq surrenders to Iran.
We did more than our fair share to set them up with a decent government after we took out Saddam for our own defense. If they surrender to a mad man, let them reap what they've sown.

12 posted on 11/29/2006 8:51:26 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
And to think our good soldiers gave their blood for this....a sell-out "leader" in Iraq.

I don't know what you're complaining about. This official was duly elected through the process undertaken by the people of Iraq (who gave his party control of their legislature). Don't you remember seeing picture after picture of their purple fingers? And the associated back slapping and hand claps from 'conservatives' around the world? What? You didn't expect them to actually fall in line with US interests once they started using that blessed democracy Bush kept talking about it did you? Woodrow would be proud.

Just hope y'all won't be too upset when a Persian superstate (or at least a very close tie between Iraq and Iran) starts to appear (give it 15-20 years)....Woohoo, can I get a cheer for 'spreading democracy'?

P.S. Realists told you this would happen over three years ago....

13 posted on 11/29/2006 8:53:44 PM PST by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
This all smells really bad. Iran has been the major sponsor of terror for the last 26 years, and has a hand in all that has happened in Iraq. Now they denounce terrorism, and will help? There is no end to the gullibility of American and Western "accomodationists", particularly in our State Department. This will lead to World War.
14 posted on 11/29/2006 9:02:22 PM PST by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

nuke nuke nuke nuke


15 posted on 11/29/2006 9:02:44 PM PST by gotribe (There's still time to begin a war in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
This is the reality of telling the Iraqis we want out - not them getting the message as the democrats claimed. Oh, they got the message alright, and they will seek a protector in Iran because we are punking out.

As best I can tell there is no longer a WOT in the Middle East. We have now accepted Syria and Iran although they sponsor terrorism. We are not positioned to take out the Iranian nuke program.

I think Bush long ago wimped out, he sidelined Cheney, tossed out Rumsfeld, the Neocons left. We now are into "finding a way out." Absolutely pathetic and ineffective.

16 posted on 11/29/2006 9:03:25 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
I don't know what you're complaining about. This official was duly elected through the process undertaken by the people of Iraq (who gave his party control of their legislature).

They didn't know the American people would choose the cut and run democrats at the time. If America as a whole had stood securely behind them, things would be a lot different today.

What would YOU do if those who were there to help you constantly discussed packing up and leaving? Would you still listen to them, or would you take the safest route to what ever peace you could find?

17 posted on 11/29/2006 9:04:45 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

I want a real live test of MOAB.......may inspire the right kind of awe needed in that region.


18 posted on 11/29/2006 9:06:51 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (Unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
And your forgot to mention the election of Hamas to power -- yet another shining example of democracy at work in the Arab/Islamic world.

Thing is, many American officials were genuinely surprised when it happened.

19 posted on 11/29/2006 9:06:52 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: billbears; EagleUSA; freedomdefender; concerned about politics; stevestras
Bush and Malikii are to hold a news conference and field questions from reporters who may very ask about this....

Live Thread: President Bush and Prime Minister Malaki Press Conference (2:30 A.M. EST)

20 posted on 11/29/2006 9:09:46 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson