Skip to comments.EXCLUSIVE: Iranian Weapons Arm Iraqi Militia
Posted on 11/30/2006 8:19:10 AM PST by jmc1969
click here to read article
President Bush should come out and say publicly, "The next coalition force member that is killed by a weapon or IED that can be linked to being manufactured in Iran or by a member of Iran, the United States will view as a Declaration of War."
If they know exactly where the factories are then we need to take them out.
Instead of fighting honorably, they hide behind terrorists, women, children, etc.
I almost wish I could go over there and do something about it myself.
Please. They are fighting the only way they can. To fight "honorably" is suicide. We didn't fight the British "honorably" during the Revolution. You fight the way that gives you the military advantage.
President Bush is already workin' hard making the tough decisions to do the hard work of workin' hard.
Good question. Here's a thought.
Invite the leadership of the various Iranian dissident groups to Iraq, for weapons training on the newest and greatest US technology, then let them take it back home with them.
Iran would make a great testing ground for our new weapons systems, like that new assault rifle that lobs frag grenades so that they burst directly over the heads of bad guys hiding behind cover.
Especially if it doesn't risk US troops.
Nothing like a little home-grown insurgency to distract the Mullahs from international mischief...
High time to "negotiate" with Iran and Syria...
They're playin' that old Beach Boys tune in my head again...
Bad analogy. We didn't blow up innocent children, cut women's throats, etc..
Of course Iran wants the US to lose the war. Iran wants to control Iraq.
Bush was trying to get the word out to the voters before the elections, but the liberal press was too busy campaigning for the democrats and people didn't get the whole story.
(He who controls communication controls the world. Reality is created by the press. What isn't reported is just as important as what is.)
That there is a government constituency that has asked for the weapons and are appreciative because it means they can fight Sunnis? The alternative is for us to arm the Shia militias.
I love how MSM media outlets report on facts that have been known for months if not years as if they were the first to discover it - yesterday!
I asked Jveritas to do a guest essay about this on my website, http://therobb7.bravejournal.com/
You'll find it on the Wednesday October 4th entry.
These weapons are coming from EVERYWHERE and it's past time to do something.
That's series! This could be hugh!
We'll probably do the same with them as North Korea, stop iPod imports.
Thanks to the Democrats and the anitwar liberals in the media .. there ain't much we can do about it
All part of the sad lesson we are all about to learn
Let the code verifications begin............
Are you kidding? The DUmmies have been praising Iran ever since they received their letter of support from the Iranian mad man yesterday. He's their newly elected God of the year.
Expect a LOT more of that from all the usual suspects. It's their message to the RATs that "we made you, we can break you," letting the RATs know who is really in charge.
(cue Manuel ... "I will get your bill")
move troops out of the cities and to the borders. Let the Iraqi troops/police deal with the cities, with our guys on stand by to come in to take care of situations.
Nuke'em til they glow...
Then shoot'em in the dark
We need to talk to the bastards, all right. Maybe: back out of Iraq or we will join with the Israelis and bomb the heck out of your military facilities. We could take on the Iransins while the Israelis handled the Syrians. How do you say that in diplomatize?
"Jim Baker says we need to TALK with Iran"
We need to talk to them about how we will knock the crap out of them.
"I know, why don't you get the UN to give them a "harsh reprimand."
Threatened? Threatened? Times up. Start carpet bombing."
screw the useless un. you need to give them one warning. they screw up, then start the carpet bombing.
That Carter moron makes me sick. The real poster boy for Presidential failure.
The way I figure it, the world already views Bush as the Devil and America as a fascist, over-bearing, colonizing country. Let's just BE that country and show the world what America would be like if we WERE a fascist, over-bearing, colonizing country with a Devil as its leader. Oh, and immediately sanction ourselves from sending financial aid to ANYONE.
The enemy is militant Islam, not terrorism.
The enemy is ANY nation who supports, celebrates or encourages the Islamic terrorists.
It remains my opinion we have been far too restrained in delivering the level of destruction necessary to defeat or punish the enemy.
This enemy will not be so inclined.
By now we should have learned that militant Islamics negotiate "peace" only to survive in order to rebuild strength to attack again... It has always been so.
For me, the high point of the Carter "Presidency" was when he beat Teddy Kennedy for the 1980 nomination. BWAHAHAHAHAHA!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my miscellaneous ping list.
We've got to go on a media blitz before the Air Force blitz. Our military should put it on display and invite the press, including al Jezzera, to see it.
Of course, some of the MSM reporters will call in sick with diarrhea and whoever attends will get real diarrhea!
How can anyone possibly be surprised?
But isn't that what John Kerry said we did?
Sorry, forgot to post you on #86.
Take a deep breath and think about this....
Maybe they are supplying arms/explosives to the Shii'as *because* we are doing a pretty good job of destablization in Iran.
The KDP has been raising Cain all over the northern Iraq/Iran AO. Who is paying for it remains to be seen.
Anyone care to theorize what would be happening in Iraq and/or U.S. right now if the U.S. had never gone into Iraq and Saddam was still in power?
When you have a chance the paper below is worth reading. The U.S. is still in good shape:
Lose 500,000 now or lose 500,000,000 later: It's up to Nancy Pelosi. Which will she choose?
The US is fighting groups armed by Iran and trained by Hezbollah (backed by Syria and Iran).
Now forget that you know.
Because if it rattles inside your head, your blood pressure will go up, you will get anxious, and you will want to scream at an Administration that will allow the US to be defeated by these barbarians.
An Administration that asked Israel for restraint fighting Hezbollah and finally saved Hezbollah by agreeing to a French/Arab cease fire which allows Hezbolla to get back to its main current interest- training terrorists to kill Americans in Iraq.
An Administration that has been threatening Iran for years but throws carrots at them on bended knee begging them to stop their nuclear development. Getting from the Iranians deserved contempt in return.
What concerns the US? These arms and the training that's killing Americans? No. What concerns Rice today is that Israel should do more to help the terrorists. That Israeli security is humiliating to the terrorists.
Many will blame the election and the Democrats. What has Bush done for the previous three years? Sure, he sent Karen Hughes to explain to them why they should like us. But that didn't seem to take.
You don't want to believe it, neither do I. We are going to lose. Israel is going to lose too- having already lost their minds.
There is no winning unless- at a start- Iran and Syria are taken on. If you believe they will be- I hope you are right.
If there is any chance of for some sort of American success in Iraq, and elsewhere, it will start with Bush firing appeaser Rice and publicly throwing the Baker report into the garbage. And then go to war against those Nations- not just shadowy terrorists but named nations- at war with us.
Either we win or they win. They win if it's a draw.
Any full scale war with Iran would be foolhardly, and would undercut the sizable anti-Immamist elements in Iran, but I don't think the antigovernment protesters would have much problem with our taking out a few Revolutionary Guard bases near the border. As a warning we might take out just one base, but task a freakin' wing of B-2s and blanket the sucker with bombs so that not even a cockroach remains alive.
Just a thought.
Since we're fighting Iran, we might as well fight Iran.
Come on, Pres. Bush, do the right thing. If Iran is killing us, they have blood-guilt.
I'm gonna re-write the Beach Boys' "Barbara Ann."
Continued thwarting of "inspections," by Saddam would make the headlines, and Iran would be flying under the radar, probably already with a Nuke. We would still be based in the "holy land" Saudi Arabia, acting as the best propaganda tool available to Al Queda. We might have been struck again here at home, as Al Queda would not be pre-occupied with fighting in Iraq. We would not be in Iraq, in position to pounce on Iran or Syria if need be. Democrats would be bellowing about how we lost our opportunity to take out Saddam when we had the chance.
It appears she is willing to wear a burqa on this one.
Oh, forgot to add: Israel might have taken out Saddam itself by now, after Saddam lends increasing support to Hezbollah and Hamas.