Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What About Clinton and Kosovo? Get Over 'Bush Lied' Nonsense
Human Events ^ | December.1, 2006 | Larry Elder

Posted on 11/30/2006 8:30:00 PM PST by Reagan Man

The White House -- finally -- began pushing back against irresponsible charges that Bush "lied" to the American people in making the case for war.

The garrulous Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., made many "Bush lied" accusations: "There was no imminent threat. This was made up in Texas, announced in January [2003] to the Republican leadership that war was going to take place and was going to be good politically. This whole thing was a fraud." And Kennedy later intoned on the Senate floor, "Before the war, week after week after week after week, we were told lie after lie after lie after lie."

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., said, " . . . [T]he administration intentionally misled the country into war." Anti-war protester Cindy Sheehan, speaking to the president in a TV ad, said, "You were wrong about the weapons of mass destruction. You were wrong about the link between Iraq and al-Qaeda. You lied to us, and because of your lies, my son died."

Question: If Bush "lied," did former President Clinton "lie" about Kosovo?

Clinton, in a March 24, 1999, Oval Office broadcast, explained his military action in Kosovo: "We act to prevent a wider war, to defuse a powder keg at the heart of Europe, that has exploded twice before in this century with catastrophic results. . . . By acting now, we are upholding our values, protecting our interests and advancing the cause of peace.

. . . Ending this tragedy is a moral imperative. It is also important to America's national interests. . . . Do our interests in Kosovo justify the dangers to our armed forces? . . . I am convinced that the dangers of acting are far outweighed by the dangers of not acting -- dangerous to defenseless people and to our national interests. . . . I have a responsibility as president to deal with problems such as this before they do permanent harm to our national interests. America has a responsibility to stand with our allies when they are trying to save innocent lives and preserve peace, freedom and stability in Europe. That is what we are doing in Kosovo."

The former president called Kosovo a humanitarian crisis. The New York Times, on April 19, 1999, wrote: "In San Francisco on Thursday, President Clinton said that the Serbs had displaced 'over a million Kosovars' and had killed and raped 'thousands upon thousands of them.' From interviews that journalists and relief workers have conducted with scores of refugees from Kosovo, there is no reason to doubt him. But at this point it is also impossible to prove that he is correct."

Actor/activist Mike Farrell, who opposes the Iraq War, nevertheless supported military action in Kosovo, stating, "I am in favor of an intervention. . . . I was in Rwanda shortly after the slaughter there. I was infuriated then -- and am now -- that the international community did not step in. . . . I know that the escalation of violence and violations of human rights in Kosovo have been going on for some time. . . . I reluctantly find myself supporting the notion that something needed to be done and that it is appropriate for us to act, and if this is the only way, so be it."

But what about Clinton's assertion of the displacement of "over a million Kosovars"? According to USA Today on July 1, 1999, "Many of the figures used by the Clinton administration and NATO to describe the wartime plight of Albanians in Kosovo now appear greatly exaggerated as allied forces take control of the province. . . . Instead of 100,000 ethnic Albanian men feared murdered by rampaging Serbs, officials now estimate that about 10,000 were killed."

But is the 10,000 number accurate?

The Orange County Register, in a Nov. 22, 1999, editorial, said, "Months after the bombing has ceased, United Nations and European Union investigations have bolstered what critics had argued: NATO's estimates of Serbian genocide against the Kosovars were greatly overblown. Many observers now think the inflated numbers simply were part of the U.S.-led propaganda effort to build support for the war.

" . . . The latest evidence suggests that fewer than 3,000 Kosovars were murdered -- horrifying, yes, but not many more than the number of Serbs who were killed by NATO bombing attacks on Yugoslavia, roughly estimated between 3,000 and 5,000 soldiers and civilians."

Does this mean that Clinton "lied, people died"? The intelligence turned out to be wrong, very wrong. Something like this always warrants a serious examination of intelligence failures. But intelligence failures, bad intelligence or failing to properly analyze the intelligence is a far cry from accusing a commander in chief of deliberately and intentionally misleading the American people.

Can we, perhaps, now drop the "Bush lied" nonsense, and pursue the business of winning the war against Islamo-fascism? Perhaps?


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: balkans; balkanskosovo; bushlied; clinton; clintonlegacy; clintonlied; hoppyismonica; ihoppy; kosovo; larryelder; pancakeboy; serbia; toothlessdhimmi; toothlesslewinski; wrongside; wrongwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Reagan Man


Someone has been reading my blogs!

I remember the left talked about death camps and all the other things the Serbs were supposedly doing. And when we get over there we find none of it.


21 posted on 11/30/2006 11:03:48 PM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pray4liberty
Am afraid, Bush is too late smart on this one. . .myths have their own powerful realities. His first mistake was ignoring the 'myth-making' of the Left re the Election and the Florida debaucle. . .

Recreating reality. ..and the history it frames; is something the Left does because the 'truth' is their first enemy. . .they refashion truth into their own image. . .using 'body snatching' tools of political correctness and of course, they always keep their 'lies' close by, to rely on.

22 posted on 11/30/2006 11:24:12 PM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
["The latest evidence suggests that fewer than 3,000 Kosovars were murdered -- horrifying, yes, but not many more than the number of Serbs who were killed by NATO bombing attacks on Yugoslavia, roughly estimated between 3,000 and 5,000 soldiers and civilians." ]

We can refer to the same thing in Bosnia. The BBC consistently reports that 250,000 people were killed. In fact, it's no where even close to the BBC's claim during the Civil War.

Of course Hoppy would disagree with my argument to build his case against Gen. Mladic.
23 posted on 11/30/2006 11:25:17 PM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
P.S. x42i also promised troops to be home from Bosnia by Christmas. Was it a Lie ? Maybe not, he never said in what year.

Oh no. I remember watching him on TV and hearing from his own mouth "I promise the troops will all be home one year from now." I believe that was in the fall of '99. He used the word 'promise' and he said it like it was his most solemn vow. I'm sure it was too, knowing he was lying as he spoke the words, that is his best effort.

24 posted on 12/01/2006 12:30:16 AM PST by TigersEye (Ego chatters on endlessly. Mind speaks in great silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Bookmark


25 posted on 12/01/2006 12:31:12 AM PST by Pajamajan (Pray for president Bush-pray for our military-pray for our congress-pray for our nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Kosovo was an illegal war under all definitions and a such, Bill Klintoon and 'his general' Weasel Clark are war criminals. The indiscriminate bombing (and with 'dumb bombs' no less), from 35,000 feet was a Crime Against Humanity and the funding and arming of the terrorist KLA was treasonous.

It is Willard and the Weasel who should have been sitting in the dock in The Hague, NOT Slobo!

26 posted on 12/01/2006 4:45:19 AM PST by Condor51 (Tagline Under Construction - Kindly Wear Your Hardhat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
"The boys will be home by Christmas" was the quote I remember. He just didn't say what year! Clinton went to war as a partner with Bin Laden and drug running Islam terrorists to kill Serbian Christians and seize land from them, ignoring the war powers act in the process. He should have been impeached, indicted, and thrown in jail for that one.
27 posted on 12/01/2006 5:54:13 AM PST by T. Jefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
Bill Klintoon and 'his general' Weasel Clark are war criminals.

Feel free to take your argument to it's logical conclusion and call for the prosecution of those servicemen who actually perpetrated your imaginary war crimes - the pilots of the USAF, USN, and USMC.

28 posted on 12/01/2006 12:31:15 PM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite; Condor51; T. Jefferson
As every day goes by, Hoplite, more people realize that the American people were misled into supporting your beloved but murderous Muslim Albanian terrorists.

Did you really think you could keep the truth buried forever, Dhimmi?

And Serbia, with her national borders still encompassing Kosovo, moves closer to partenship with NATO.

29 posted on 12/01/2006 1:39:18 PM PST by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite

["Feel free to take your argument to it's logical conclusion and call for the prosecution of those servicemen who actually perpetrated your imaginary war crimes - the pilots of the USAF, USN, and USMC."]

So what does your verbose comment have to do with the price of eggs in Denmark?

In short, servicemen are not responsible for policy decision makers...and you should know that.


30 posted on 12/01/2006 8:41:58 PM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: T. Jefferson
I tried to Google up the quote I was thinking of. You may have heard one press bite and I heard another. Hard to say. It occurred to me that the promise I was thinking of was about troops in Bosnia not Kosovo. I distinctly remember him promising that we would be completely out in one year. Seemed like it was in the fall when he said it.

He should have been tried for treason and hung for Chinagate.

31 posted on 12/01/2006 10:27:03 PM PST by TigersEye (Ego chatters on endlessly. Mind speaks in great silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic
In short, servicemen are not responsible for policy decision makers...and you should know that.

The Nuremburg defence?

You're joking, right?

Tell you what - why don't you identify specifically what actions or events you'd consider war crimes in reference to the prosecution of Operation Allied Force, and we can take it from there, m'kay?

You're so out of your depth here it's not even funny.

32 posted on 12/02/2006 10:31:56 AM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite
["The Nuremburg defence? You're joking, right?"]

Well not really. I never viewed, for example, Herman Goering as a simple soldier (serviceman). Rather I view him as KEY POLICY DECISION MAKER in terms of executing a war. Big difference.
33 posted on 12/02/2006 12:50:49 PM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic

Why don't you identify specifically what actions or events you'd consider war crimes in reference to the prosecution of Operation Allied Force, and we can take it from there, m'kay?


34 posted on 12/02/2006 1:28:30 PM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite

Giving the order to bomb innocent civilians in order to protect Muhammedan terrorists.

The accused is none other than your hero, Bill Clinton.

M'kay?

Not only did he kill a lot of Christians, but he made those kneepads you wear fashionable.


35 posted on 12/02/2006 1:54:30 PM PST by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite
["Why don't you identify specifically what actions or events you'd consider war crimes in reference to the prosecution of Operation Allied Force, and we can take it from there, m'kay?"]

Nice to see that gave your previous post a thorough revision.

However, you are directing your question in the wrong direction.

Feel free to find where I ever expressed views that would implicate US "servicemen" as "war criminals" in the events surrounding Operation Allied Force...I'll save you time...you won't find any.

Further, I don't consider General Wesley Clark (Supreme Allied Commander of Europe - NATO) to be a "serviceman" Rather he's is (was) a "policy maker."
36 posted on 12/03/2006 2:38:44 AM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic
Nice to see that gave your previous post a thorough revision.

Hoppy gives everything a thorough revision, including reality and his sexuality.

37 posted on 12/03/2006 5:46:20 AM PST by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic
Feel free to find where I ever expressed views that would implicate US "servicemen" as "war criminals" in the events surrounding Operation Allied Force...I'll save you time...you won't find any.

Then come out and say that no war crimes were committed by NATO during Allied Force and I'll consider the matter closed with you.

Further, I don't consider General Wesley Clark (Supreme Allied Commander of Europe - NATO) to be a "serviceman" Rather he's is (was) a "policy maker."

Everybody's entitled to an opinion, regardless of whether it's informed or not.

38 posted on 12/03/2006 9:12:10 AM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite

["Everybody's entitled to an opinion, regardless of whether it's informed or not."]

The SACEUR and Secretary General of NATO both hold "HEAD OF STATE" status, so as to be able to cut through red tape and contact anyone in the world in order to hold the Alliance together.

That, in my mind, puts General Clark above the level of "serviceman."


39 posted on 12/03/2006 2:29:02 PM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic
That, in my mind, puts General Clark above the level of "serviceman."

If he's wearing an American military uniform, regardless of what position he's holding, he reports to someone, and serves at their pleasure.

Your ignorance of our military chain of command is just a distraction, however, as you're avoiding the question of whether you consider any of the actions carried out by NATO during Operation Allied Force war crimes.

40 posted on 12/03/2006 3:22:38 PM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson