Skip to comments.
'Lucy' Hominid Skeleton to Tour American Museums
Foxnews ^
| October 25, 2006
| Associated Press
Posted on 12/08/2006 1:55:20 PM PST by scottdeus12
ADDIS ABABA, Ethiopia One of the world's most famous fossils the 3.2 million-year-old Lucy skeleton unearthed in Ethiopia in 1974 is to travel to the United States, going on display abroad for the first time, officials said Tuesday.
Even the Ethiopian public has seen Lucy only twice the Lucy exhibition at the Ethiopian Natural History Museum in the capital, Addis Ababa, is a replica; the real remains are usually locked in a vault.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: creationism; evolution; lucy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-59 next last
To: scottdeus12
I always enjoy these evo threads....and heck, it's Friday.....Comments?
Scott
2
posted on
12/08/2006 1:56:13 PM PST
by
scottdeus12
(Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
To: scottdeus12
The Holy Lord laid out this abomination upon the sand to test the faith of men. Unto all will crackles of lightning fly, and woe unto him who darkens the helldoor of any museum which may hold these devilbones.
To: Weep-o-crat Hunter
Looking at the bones in this pic, I just don't get how this is the "Smoking Gun" that verifies we evolved from apes......
4
posted on
12/08/2006 2:08:19 PM PST
by
scottdeus12
(Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
To: Weep-o-crat Hunter
Ping for when I've been drinking and that post may make sense.
5
posted on
12/08/2006 2:09:49 PM PST
by
ShadowDancer
(No autopsy, no foul.)
To: scottdeus12
"we evolved from apes."
Popular mistake.
Common ancestor actually, not evolved from apes.
To: Names Ash Housewares
"Common ancestor actually, not evolved from apes."
So what is the human starting point then?
7
posted on
12/08/2006 2:23:02 PM PST
by
scottdeus12
(Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
To: Names Ash Housewares
Popular mistakeIt's not a mistake, it's deliberate ignorance.
8
posted on
12/08/2006 2:24:40 PM PST
by
ASA Vet
(The WOT should have been over on 9/12/01.)
To: Weep-o-crat Hunter
9
posted on
12/08/2006 2:24:49 PM PST
by
kesg
To: ShadowDancer
It is the Lord's Own Blood you must drink to truly understand, from a golden cup encrusted with the most precious of saintly jewels. Whiskey is naught but Satan's own micturation.
To: Weep-o-crat Hunter
The Holy Lord laid out this abomination upon the sand to test the faith of men. Unto all will crackles of lightning fly, and woe unto him who darkens the helldoor of any museum which may hold these devilbones. Hee hee! You're funny! You ought to include a /sarcasm tag with your posts though, or else folks will think your a raving loon.
11
posted on
12/08/2006 2:30:53 PM PST
by
Junior
(Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.)
To: scottdeus12
She's got some 'splainin' to do.
12
posted on
12/08/2006 2:31:37 PM PST
by
dfwgator
To: Junior
Sarcasm is the lingua franca of the unreconstructed Satanist. It is something in which a warrior for Our Lord will never engage.
To: scottdeus12
14
posted on
12/08/2006 2:35:09 PM PST
by
Rastus
To: scottdeus12
Thanks for the heads-up: I look forward to seeing her when she comes to New York.
15
posted on
12/08/2006 2:39:58 PM PST
by
highball
(Proud to announce the birth of little Highball, Junior - Feb. 7, 2006!)
To: scottdeus12
"So what is the human starting point then?"
I am not here to debate it.
I was simply making a correction to what the theory in fact is.
To: Weep-o-crat Hunter
LOL! Dude (or dudette), a shot of whiskey (prozac may help as well) just might be the thing you need.
To: scottdeus12
Not only that but if you read the real story about Lucy you will find that some of "her bones" were found a half mile or so away from the rest of them which tells me that all the bones are not from the same ape. These idiots will go to any length rather than admit they are pushing a loser.
18
posted on
12/08/2006 2:44:35 PM PST
by
fish hawk
(.)
To: scottdeus12
Disgusting, little Ricky must be furious!
19
posted on
12/08/2006 2:48:33 PM PST
by
east1234
(It's the borders stupid. It's also WWIV.)
To: Rastus
Oh, that's cute!
We saw a re-pro of "Lucy" at the Natural History museum in Balboa Park, San Diego, CA many years ago. Since I'm only 5'1", Husband's only comment was, "That's pretty much what you'd look like dressed out." LOL!
We're hunters, not cannibals, if anyone doesn't get the humor. ;)
20
posted on
12/08/2006 2:49:33 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: fish hawk
Myth! learn some real science for once.
To: RadioAstronomer
I take it that you are one of the Idiots I just mentioned. If you want to talk about Mythology let's talk about evolution.
22
posted on
12/08/2006 2:51:57 PM PST
by
fish hawk
(.)
Comment #23 Removed by Moderator
To: fish hawk
You wear your ignorance proudly.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
"That's pretty much what you'd look like dressed out." LOL! Now that's funny!
To: scottdeus12
Several years ago scientists were disputing how old the fossil was. There was a pun type headline about this, "Problems In Dating Older Women."
26
posted on
12/08/2006 3:13:48 PM PST
by
preacher
(A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
To: Random Access
Glad you got the Midwest Humor. :)
27
posted on
12/08/2006 3:15:54 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: RadioAstronomer; fish hawk
Okay then, just when, where, and how long did the collection of Lucy bones take, and in what proximity of area were all the Lucy bones taken from.
Oh BTW, real sources not disguised talk-orgins links.
28
posted on
12/08/2006 3:16:18 PM PST
by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: scottdeus12
the 3.2 million-year-old LucyYeah, but she's got the body of a 1.8 million year old!
To: fish hawk
>Not only that but if you read the real story about Lucy you will find that some of "her bones" were found a half mile or so away from the rest of them which tells me that all the bones are not from the same ape. These idiots will go to any length rather than admit they are pushing a loser.
No, Lucy is a 40% complete skeleton all from one location. There is a quote that confuses some people from a earlier interview
"Q. How far away from Lucy did you find the knee?
A. Sixty to seventy meters lower in the strata and two to three kilometers away."
Which is talking about a different knee joint found in 1973. Since then we have found other afarensis skeletons that include the knee joint.
I'm just worried that something will happen to the skeleton. The public relations backlash from some idiot attacking it would be massive.
30
posted on
12/08/2006 3:24:52 PM PST
by
sydjim
To: Weep-o-crat Hunter
Sarcasm is the lingua franca of the unreconstructed Satanist. It is something in which a warrior for Our Lord will never engage. I dunno...I think his "render unto Caesar" remark was pretty sarcastic....
31
posted on
12/08/2006 3:25:28 PM PST
by
paulat
(about)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Since I'm only 5'1" Holy CR@P!!, Diana....
...you post much taller....
32
posted on
12/08/2006 3:26:51 PM PST
by
paulat
(about)
To: sydjim
Lucy is an ape not a person but even so it would be a bad for someone to mess up its skeleton. If anyone reading this thread thinks Lucy is the "missing link" they are daffy. There is nor has never been a "missing link". Even Radio man can't argue that point.
33
posted on
12/08/2006 3:31:24 PM PST
by
fish hawk
(.)
To: fish hawk
Not only that but if you read the real story about Lucy you will find that some of "her bones" were found a half mile or so away from the rest of them which tells me that all the bones are not from the same ape. These idiots will go to any length rather than admit they are pushing a loser. The story is false. See Index to Creationist Claims: Claim CC003
34
posted on
12/08/2006 3:33:11 PM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Coyoteman
It doesn't really matter. See post 33. Of course if any of you have a missing link I would be interested in seeing it. (so would a lot of scientists)
35
posted on
12/08/2006 3:38:10 PM PST
by
fish hawk
(.)
To: scottdeus12
Due to budget constraints, the tour will be accompanied by a skeleton crew.
36
posted on
12/08/2006 3:39:26 PM PST
by
sappy
Comment #37 Removed by Moderator
To: fish hawk
Of course if any of you have a missing link I would be interested in seeing it. (so would a lot of scientists) This is a transitional, what some journalists or laymen might call a missing link.
Scientists already know about it, along with a number of other intermediate species (see the chart).
Many non-scientists deny this type of evidence for religious reasons, but that does not make it go away, nor does it lessen its significance.
Fossil: KNM-ER 3733

Site: Koobi Fora (Upper KBS tuff, area 104), Lake Turkana, Kenya (4, 1)
Discovered By: B. Ngeneo, 1975 (1)
Estimated Age of Fossil: 1.75 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, faunal, paleomagnetic & radiometric data (1, 4)
Species Name: Homo ergaster (1, 7, 8), Homo erectus (3, 4, 7), Homo erectus ergaster (25)
Gender: Female (species presumed to be sexually dimorphic) (1, 8)
Cranial Capacity: 850 cc (1, 3, 4)
Information: Tools found in same layer (8, 9). Found with KNM-ER 406 A. boisei (effectively eliminating single species hypothesis) (1)
Interpretation: Adult (based on cranial sutures, molar eruption and dental wear) (1)
See original source for notes:
Source: http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=33
Source: http://wwwrses.anu.edu.au/environment/eePages/eeDating/HumanEvol_info.html
38
posted on
12/08/2006 3:45:21 PM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Coyoteman
What are all of those dotted lines for?
39
posted on
12/08/2006 3:59:11 PM PST
by
mirvin
To: Weep-o-crat Hunter
It is the Lord's Own Blood you must drink to truly understand, from a golden cup encrusted with the most precious of saintly jewels. Whiskey is naught but Satan's own micturation. You're in dire need of a holy ghost enema.
40
posted on
12/08/2006 4:11:45 PM PST
by
shuckmaster
(An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
To: paulat
The Lord Himself is offered Special Dispensation from the Laws Of Men on matters such as these.
To: Weep-o-crat Hunter
The Lord Himself is offered Special Dispensation from the Laws Of Men on matters such as these. I have no idea what you're talking about, or why you're responding to me.
42
posted on
12/08/2006 4:35:55 PM PST
by
paulat
(about)
To: shuckmaster
{{You're in dire need of a holy ghost enema.}}
I Don't know what this Means.
To: fish hawk
I take it that you are one of the Idiots I just mentioned. If you want to talk about Mythology let's talk about evolutionOr the Quran or the Bible -- both copied a lot of older Pagan mythology. The latter retreaded some Pagan holidays too. For evidence read Richard Dawkins book The God Delusion
Or see this very exhaustively documented website: Welcome to Enlightenment!
But I'd bet most are too chicken to read the evidence and find out they may have been bamboozled by old retreaded mythology.
44
posted on
12/08/2006 4:59:56 PM PST
by
Solitar
("My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them." -- Barry Goldwater)
To: paulat
Oh, my mouth takes up a good 4',11" of me, LOL! :)
45
posted on
12/08/2006 5:41:06 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Oh, my mouth takes up a good 4',11" of me, LOL! :) You and me both!!!
46
posted on
12/08/2006 5:53:45 PM PST
by
paulat
(about)
To: RadioAstronomer
You know you can't get a creationist to understand science.
They are afraid that learning something new will destroy their faith.
Kinda makes you wonder how strong their dogmatic beliefs are in the first place.
Is Lucy coming to Phoenix?
47
posted on
12/08/2006 5:55:43 PM PST
by
Central Scrutiniser
(Pro Evolution, Pro Stem Cell Research, Pro Science, Pro Free Thought, and Conservative)
To: Solitar
Give me a break!! Richard Dawkins. LOL He's one of the biggest dimwit Atheists around. Anyone who puts any credence in what he has to say...wanna buy a bridge in Brooklyn?
48
posted on
12/08/2006 6:00:00 PM PST
by
fish hawk
(.)
To: Coyoteman
Thank you for that link and graphic. Is Lucy then Homo ergaster -- the link above Homo habilus just below Homo erectus and just below the branch leading to us?
Eventually various other missing pieces may be found to help fill the gaps. At least those gaps in our evolution are smaller and easier to explain than the big gap between Adam and the present (I've long wondered who Cain and Abel married if Adam and Eve were the first two people).
49
posted on
12/08/2006 6:01:52 PM PST
by
Solitar
("My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them." -- Barry Goldwater)
To: Solitar
Is Lucy then Homo ergaster -- the link above Homo habilus just below Homo erectus and just below the branch leading to us? Lucy is currently classified as Australopithecus afarensis.
I posted the H. ergaster information in response to a request for a "missing link" (transitional).
50
posted on
12/08/2006 6:11:03 PM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson