Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress is still in session - 12-9-06 @ 4:24am et
Cspan-2 ^ | 12-9-06

Posted on 12/09/2006 1:27:40 AM PST by STARWISE

Frist is throwing out "unanimous consents" out like water .. speaking 90 mph.

I think the tax bill extension was passed.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; congress
What was that saying about procrastinating?
1 posted on 12/09/2006 1:27:43 AM PST by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: onyx; Mo1; Txsleuth; Peach; ohioWfan; DrDeb; nopardons

PING!

I'd like to see the status of all these bills. It's wild ...
Frist is whizzing through these like he's on speed.

He's saying they finished up their work.


2 posted on 12/09/2006 1:33:30 AM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Holy cow!

Were the tax cuts extended or made permanent?

3 posted on 12/09/2006 1:36:17 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
What was that saying about procrastinating?

Or, thank God for the last minute, or we'ld get nothing done.

4 posted on 12/09/2006 1:39:35 AM PST by leadhead (Itís a duty and a responsibility to defeat them. But it's also a pleasure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

The summary screen I just saw on C-SPAN 2 mentions offshore drilling passed.

As a Florida resident, I say YES!


5 posted on 12/09/2006 1:40:19 AM PST by Terpfen ("Conservatives" who sat at home cost us the War on Terror, SCOTUS, and economic success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I heard "extension"...I didn't switch over until this thread was posted.

Senate just adjourned...what is "sine dai" (sp)?


6 posted on 12/09/2006 1:40:59 AM PST by Christian4Bush (Don't blame me - I didn't vote for these DEM b**tards. (redacted to satiate religioncop TXBlair))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: onyx; Mo1; Txsleuth; Peach

Frist: recalling last night. Had dinner with his family .. they're empty nesters now, but their 3 sons came to be with them for his farewell speech. They sat around the restaurant table, reminiscing. Their years have changed over the last 12 years ... but this was the term of the normal life of a citizen legislator, which was his intention when he came to DC.

The 3 young boys have grown into 3 robust young men, his wife is more beautiful every day. He's seen faith strengthened and challenged, and seen a group of men and women who are very good people: good intentioned, unselfish, people with real dreams. We all have our foibles and weaknesses .. but as his Dad always said, good people beget good people.

His Dad's letter before he died: advice to people you'll never see who come after you. His last words: finally, I believe it is so terribly important in life to stay humble, use your talents wisely and use other people's talents to help other people.

Asked that Senate be adjourned ... and people are there clapping.


Passed:

US exports nuclear tech. to India
Tax breaks extended
Offshore drilling
VietNam trade bill
Stopgap spending measure .. (I believe until 2/15/07)


7 posted on 12/09/2006 1:45:39 AM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I think extended .. ;(


8 posted on 12/09/2006 1:46:27 AM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

They would've been made permanent if we had held on to Congress. An extension means they'll come up again as a political issue for Republicans to use to get back into power.


9 posted on 12/09/2006 1:50:45 AM PST by Terpfen ("Conservatives" who sat at home cost us the War on Terror, SCOTUS, and economic success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 109th Congress - 2nd Session (2006)- Refreshed Every 20 Minutes

Anyone one know what the tangible difference is between "Agreed To" and "Passed?"

10 posted on 12/09/2006 1:54:31 AM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

I know.


11 posted on 12/09/2006 1:54:58 AM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

The only way to shut off the pork-barrel spending is to allow Congress to be in session four times a year for one month. Maybe then they wouldhave to prioritize??? These guys have way too much time on their hands - too much time spent thinking about how they can create their own legacies by using my hard-earned money.


12 posted on 12/09/2006 1:57:09 AM PST by DennisR (Look around - God is giving you countless observable clues of His existence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Perhaps they are "battening down the hatches" for the Socialist storm about to hit us. Remember the "first 100 days" ninny pelosi keeps warning us about.
13 posted on 12/09/2006 2:02:49 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; All

Thanks for posting. Thanks to all contributors. BUMP!


14 posted on 12/09/2006 2:17:00 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Oh well....better than nothing, I guess.


15 posted on 12/09/2006 2:26:08 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush
Senate just adjourned...what is "sine dai" (sp)?

That means the 109th Congress is over. It has essentially ceased to exist, as opposed to being in recess.

16 posted on 12/09/2006 2:27:05 AM PST by Omega Man II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob
Pelosi is talking about THE FIRST 100 HOURS; GOD help us.
17 posted on 12/09/2006 2:27:48 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Stopgap spending measure .. (I believe until 2/15/07)

Wrong. The that-which-is-not-Kosher-barrel stopgap spending has no measure nor is there any sunset anticipated.... /s
18 posted on 12/09/2006 2:49:36 AM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush

sine die -- all Latin vowels are voiced -- "see-nay dee-ay" -- it's Latin for "without a day." They haven't set a date to reconvene.


19 posted on 12/09/2006 2:52:31 AM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Omega Man II

The date of reconvening would be what, Jan. 3, 2007 -- unless by law they set a different date? Does the different date have to be set by the previous Congress, or is it done some other way?


20 posted on 12/09/2006 2:57:00 AM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

"Remember the "first 100 days" ninny pelosi keeps warning us about"
_________

I can hardly wait...


21 posted on 12/09/2006 3:07:40 AM PST by xowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I hope they make concealed carry in national parks legal. Are they talking about that?


22 posted on 12/09/2006 3:11:44 AM PST by Tolsti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I honestly don't see how the next Congress is anything other than a "do nothing" Congress: 1.) The Democratic Congressional majorities are not super-majorities. 2.) If the majority of "blue dog" Democrats really do side with Republicans on most to all of the issues that they end up voting upon, then the liberal Democrats won't get anything that they want passed. This will truly depend upon what these "blue dog" Democrats really decide to do when it's time to vote. 3.) It will now be the Republican minority's turn in the U.S. Senate to be able to filibuster anything that they want to filibuster. The Democratic minority in the U.S. Senate has often succeeded in killing off many things that the Republicans tried to pass in the U.S. Senate, and now the Republicans will have the ability of doing the same things to the Democrats! 4.) President Bush also has the ability and the power to veto any legislation that he doesn't accept, and I would be very surprised if President Bush doesn't start to veto legislation with the Democrats now in the Congressional majority. 5.) The "new media" keeps getting more and more clout as more people start to pay much more attention to the "new media". The "new media" is also getting better by expanding both its support and its capabilities. For example, "You Tube" and other video sharing sites make it harder for any politician to get away with saying or doing anything controversial without getting caught and then being shown to much of the general public. Every year, less people are subscribing to newspapers, and every year, less people are watching "mainstream media" television. All of these things combined make it much harder for the Democratic Congressional majority to be able to get what they want on any issue, and all of these things should work against the "political left" on most to all of the issues.


23 posted on 12/09/2006 3:13:10 AM PST by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DennisR
"The only way to shut off the pork-barrel spending is to allow Congress to be in session four times a year for one month. Maybe then they wouldhave to prioritize??? These guys have way too much time on their hands - too much time spent thinking about how they can create their own legacies by using my hard-earned money."

Precisely. Which is why hairless reid and nancy piglosi have made the point that they're going to be working longer hours when the 'craps take charge. So they can f#@k more of us to death. I hope the President has the intestinal fortitude to wield the veto pen.

24 posted on 12/09/2006 3:23:20 AM PST by RushLake (I neutered my dog; now he's a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
What you're forgetting, though, is that the Republicans in the Senate lack a very important component:
.
25 posted on 12/09/2006 3:29:55 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

"This will truly depend upon what these "blue dog" Democrats really decide to do when it's time to vote."

Or their vote will depend on what the Democratic leaders have on the "blue dog" personal FBI files.


26 posted on 12/09/2006 3:56:09 AM PST by poobear (Political Left, continually accusing their foes of what THEY themselves do every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DennisR
The only way to shut off the pork-barrel spending is to allow Congress to be in session four times a year for one month. Maybe then they wouldhave to prioritize???

I'd like to see a short session and a long session each year, neither of them over 90 days.

The long session to be for legislation and budgets, the short one to repeal laws that are no longer necessary due to changes in society or the consolidation of 100's of laws on the same subject to one understandable law.

I know it wont happen first it would cut the neeed for as many lawyers and secondly it would defeat their goal,which is to make all of us criminals, after all free men are not controllable.

27 posted on 12/09/2006 4:12:02 AM PST by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Nancy's first 100 days are going to be Blitskrieg of liberal ussues the likes of which this country has never seen before. Its going to be expensive boys.


The Republicans will be like lambs to the slaughter huddling in the back of the corral to see which one gets the knife first.
George is going to sign everything that hits his desk.

It aint going to be pretty.


28 posted on 12/09/2006 4:33:11 AM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
George is going to sign everything that hits his desk.

It aint going to be pretty.

Ok, even I who have been a stuanch supporter for Bush in times where I thought he should
not be spending, recognizes that he will not sign "everything"...Veto's will be forthcoming.

29 posted on 12/09/2006 4:51:19 AM PST by sirchtruth (No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

"I honestly don't see how the next Congress is anything other than a "do nothing" Congress:"...

...I agree. They did not win a mandate. No matter what the press tells us. This will be 2 years of a "do nothing because we can't" congress. 2008 election will be more important than '06. The 109th is trying to leave a somewhat conservative taste in everyone's mouth for 2008.


30 posted on 12/09/2006 4:58:11 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: albie

I still think Rove set this up to get GW off the hook and let the RATS auto-eroticate themselves for two years in a do nothing congress and let the people see how bad they are and give it back to the GOP in 08, if they learn their lesson and get conservative real quick.


31 posted on 12/09/2006 5:12:12 AM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (doot...doot...video killed the radio star...doot...doot...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

I will believe it, when I see it.


32 posted on 12/09/2006 5:19:04 AM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
I will believe it, when I see it.

Well, you have EVERY right for thinking what you're thinking. Moderation is such a waste
and accomplishes absolutely NOTHING.

There's no questions some Repubs need to get their heads screwed on straight!

33 posted on 12/09/2006 5:42:45 AM PST by sirchtruth (No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Yes, Congress is still in session - and no man's honor or property is safe.


34 posted on 12/09/2006 5:57:43 AM PST by R.W.Ratikal (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

I agree. Maybe not in the manner you placed it and perhaps not with the same target, but I agree some republicans do need to get their heads on straight.

By the way how many vetoes has George got to his credit?

What makes you think he will work up enough energy to actually make another one?


35 posted on 12/09/2006 6:36:33 AM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
What makes you think he will work up enough energy to actually make another one?

For the same reason he won't take any suggestions from the Iraq Surrender Study
Group, and will not pull out of Iraq. He maybe moderate, but he's not going to go
kook left.

36 posted on 12/09/2006 6:44:49 AM PST by sirchtruth (No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
I believe motions are sub-actions on a bill, and are subject to agreement.

Bills, amendments, resolutions, etc., are "passed."

37 posted on 12/09/2006 6:53:15 AM PST by Loud Mime (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; STARWISE
My thoughts exactly.

Still the same mealy mouthed Congress, but at least they did something.....

Sigh........

38 posted on 12/09/2006 7:07:13 AM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RushLake

Do not hold your breath. :) The one thing he can do to cut spending he is apparently loathe to do.


39 posted on 12/09/2006 7:37:31 AM PST by DennisR (Look around - God is giving you countless observable clues of His existence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

The Iraqui is so bad hardly anone takes it seriously except John kerry. It isnt surprising that he ignores it. However, he also ignores the threat posed by open southern borders and the threat of unlimited illegal immigration. Inspite of the vices of Amricans he seems determined to grant amnesty to 12 million illegals now living in this country.

I like President Bush ,I support him in the Iraqui war. However when it come to Conservatism and illegal immigrants his hard headedness is focused in the wrong direction.


40 posted on 12/09/2006 8:41:23 AM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

Thank you.


41 posted on 12/09/2006 9:17:57 AM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

If he wanted to bow down to the Democrats he would have signed the stem cell bill.

He vetoed it despite reasonably large public support.


42 posted on 12/09/2006 2:07:34 PM PST by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: zendari

OK thats one. In six years.


43 posted on 12/09/2006 6:34:44 PM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

Presidents don't typically veto much when their party controls Congress.


44 posted on 12/09/2006 10:56:08 PM PST by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
I like President Bush ,I support him in the Iraqui war. However when it come to
Conservatism and illegal immigrants his hard headedness is focused in the wrong
direction.

No doubt. Also, Bush is a moderate, and this is something as head of the repub party we
can not afford to harness. If the repub party is going to be "moderate" then what alternative
do people have when elections come around, they may as well vote DBM/dem.

Repubs need a strong, principled conservative leader who understand the "fight" has the
talent and capability, and most of all the will!

45 posted on 12/10/2006 2:08:33 AM PST by sirchtruth (No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: zendari

Do you really think the republican Party really controlled Congress?

Robert Byrd controlled it more than the republicans.

The Republicans cant even control their bowels on capitol hill. Lousy leadership and RINO's took away any hoppe thay may have had to run Congress. They let Byrd tell them the rules and they went by them. Watch how fast those rules change now with the democrats back in the majority.


46 posted on 12/10/2006 4:24:52 AM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
Actually, this is what they are saying,

"...Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., told reporters. "We have alternatives, none of which are very good."

The party without a plan doesn't like what they've been left, but then they helped create the mess...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1750880/posts

47 posted on 12/10/2006 4:31:31 AM PST by EBH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DennisR
I know, I have absolutely no confidence at all that President Bush is going to be anything other than, at best, a caretaker for the next two years.

Not to get too far off topic, I keep asking the few democrats I care to talk to, after we surrender and bring the troops home, how many dead civilians on US soil will be acceptable? 3000, 10,000, 1,000,000 just suddenly occuring every so often? Oh well, just the price we'll have to pay? Universally, they seem to have no answer.

48 posted on 12/11/2006 3:16:24 AM PST by RushLake (I neutered my dog; now he's a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson