Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: corlorde
We could put forth a much better proposal, in about a tenth of the time.

Here's what I propose. Why not gather a group of Freepers that have experience from a military, political, organizational and execution perspective and do just that. You will need to have 2 or 3 people from each discipline to make it work and to cover all the bases so there is no room for disagreement.

My guess is you won't find something that is going to be 100% effective or have the good members of Free Republic be in harmony with your outcomes.

The Iraq mess is a very complex situation. We can't stay forever, which it looks like me may, and we can't just walk away.

There are portions of the Iraq Study Group report that I find hard to agree with too. But clearly our current and past strategies haven't worked in a critical region in Iraq, and being led by the best and brightest. Why pick on this group. I don't see anything in their report that would necessarily make the wheels fall off more than they already are.

18 posted on 12/09/2006 10:17:03 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: joesbucks

In the ISG report, the only thing that really stood out in my mind is beefing up the training of the Iraqi security forces. Most of our effort should go into this aspect of the report, and the rest of our forces should just stay out of the way and protect Iraqi infrastructure. Getting in between the Saudi backed Sunni's and Iranian backed Shi'a doesn't make sense to me. I just don't know why we have to hitch a sell out of Israel while we are at it.


20 posted on 12/09/2006 10:22:56 AM PST by corlorde (New Hampshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson