Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Position Paper: The Right's Attack on Sex
The Natinal Coalition for Sexual Freedom ^ | 1996, revised 2001 | By Eric Rofes and members of the San Francisco Sex/Politics Study Group

Posted on 12/09/2006 9:17:32 PM PST by Joseph DeMaistre

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: EternalVigilance
Let me guess. Mitt Romney wrote this...

Let me guess. You are the expert on LGBT sex...

21 posted on 12/09/2006 9:48:08 PM PST by Ms. AntiFeminazi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Joseph DeMaistre

The love that dare not speak its name, has become the love that won't STFU.


22 posted on 12/09/2006 9:48:11 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

Homosexual activists and their naive liberal supporters are rationally challenged.


23 posted on 12/09/2006 9:50:52 PM PST by Joseph DeMaistre (There's no such thing as relativism, only dogmatism of a different color)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan
The left has done more to ruin sex (and every other good thing in life, than the right could ever dream of.

A great example of that would be Hillary Clinton.

24 posted on 12/09/2006 10:04:58 PM PST by capt. norm (Liberalism = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joseph DeMaistre
The Right's sex-baiting has effectively shut down dialogue on sex issues within many communities. We need just the opposite: more authentic discussion about the diverse sexual experiences within our communities.

If homosexuals would keep it in their communities, I would have no problem with them. Then they would just be another set of sinners so obsessed with their genitals that they cannot see that He is standing at the door knocking (and there's plenty of heteros who get stuck in the same sad place).

But homosexuals increasingly don't keep it in-house--and that's the problem. It's when they "reach out" to young teens and elementary schoolers that I get really, really annoyed. It's when they ask the rest of the society to embrace and celebrate their addiction to obviously dangerous and perverse behavior that I draw the line.

Most homosexuals I have known (and I have know a lot and been friends with many) are, at some level, sick and angry men and women. For some reason, they are not happy unless others embrace their sickness and share their anger.

God bless them and may they someday find themselves on their knees at the foot of the cross.

The other thing about this article that I noted in the article is the notion that right-wing Christians think sex is bad. Au contraire, I am pretty comfortable saying that a very large part of the really good and enthusiastic sex in this world happens between Christian husbands and wives.

25 posted on 12/09/2006 10:05:25 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joseph DeMaistre

If "the right" is attacking sex, how come they have such big families?


26 posted on 12/09/2006 10:08:16 PM PST by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joseph DeMaistre
Again, these responses accept the use of the child as a symbol in this political war and strengthen the symbolic use of the child as innocent, needing protection, and separate from anything which can be construed as sexuality. The discussion never includes ideas such as: (a) it may be good for children to talk about sex; (b) children might be sexual beings and experience authentic questions about sex issues at different developmental stages;

Why am I not surprised?

27 posted on 12/09/2006 10:09:10 PM PST by tuesday afternoon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

Or Janet Reno, or Helen Thomas, or Ruth Bader Ginsburg, there's an endless list of those who could render the randiest billy-goat impotent.


28 posted on 12/09/2006 10:22:46 PM PST by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Joseph DeMaistre

I couldn't read through this crap.


29 posted on 12/09/2006 10:27:41 PM PST by budwiesest (Fight statism, collectivism, and communitarianists. And have fun!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ms. AntiFeminazi

Only what the homosexual activists force out into the public sphere, with the help of leftist politicians like Romney.


30 posted on 12/09/2006 10:27:44 PM PST by EternalVigilance (It's up to you to save the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Joseph DeMaistre

My idea of sex is enjoying it with someone I truly love. Passionate, sensual, romantic, special.

Their idea of sex is twisted.

It is not that traditional conservatives are anti sex. We love sex.

But we dont "respect and support" the sexuality of gays and lesbian.

A couple of lesbians going at it with a dildo is not what God intended sex to be obviously.


31 posted on 12/09/2006 11:05:18 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (he)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joseph DeMaistre

"The right's attack on sex", the whole assumption of the article had me laughing. We aren't the ones who've cheapened and demeaned sex by making it depraved, politicized, accessorized street-theater or anonymous, depersonalized, soulless addiction.


32 posted on 12/10/2006 1:17:17 AM PST by CalGOPTom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
I simply do not believe homosexual unions should be granted the same status in government and society as heterosexual unions. How damned complicated is that?

Not complicated at all. The state has interest in people reproducing, and the stability that comes from multi-generational families. That's why the state offers certain benefits to the members of these groups. To put homosexual unions on the same level ignores the historical and social importance of marriage.

It is simple. It is uncomplicated, and of course, the opposition believes that this is an attack on their sexuality and discriminatory. It's not discriminatory - every one of them can go out and marry someone of an opposite sex, none of them are forbidden from this.

33 posted on 12/10/2006 1:51:26 AM PST by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joseph DeMaistre

Wisdom from stinking (VD)riddled trash!


34 posted on 12/10/2006 4:45:17 AM PST by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joseph DeMaistre

This guy is literally a ranting lunatic.


35 posted on 12/10/2006 6:15:30 AM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan
Not to mention the randiest of men...


36 posted on 12/10/2006 6:36:34 AM PST by rlmorel (Islamofacism: It is all fun and games until someone puts an eye out. Or chops off a head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Joseph DeMaistre

I'd almost support anti-sodomy laws just to give these activists hysterics.


37 posted on 12/10/2006 2:31:56 PM PST by Dumb_Ox (http://kevinjjones.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joseph DeMaistre; AFA-Michigan; Agitate; AliVeritas; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; BabaOreally; Balke; ...
What a find! There have been threads lately with hundreds of comments, with many freepers accusing those of us who support traditional morality as prudes, bigots, homophobes, haters, and so on. For some odd reason, though, that's about the extent of their debate points aside from the usual "all the gay people I know are rock ribbed oinstripe wearing Republican voting monogamous boring couples" anecdotal stories.

THIS is the real face of homosexuality. I hope all those who have been cheering on homosexuals will come to this thread and support what this guy says.

Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Click FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search for a list of all related articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

38 posted on 12/10/2006 6:40:45 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
..Is there anything more important to these people than what they stick wherever they stick it?...

NO, there isn't! - LOL. It's exactly about that and how to do it in the most pervert way possible... That is "healthy" in their eyes. :)

39 posted on 12/10/2006 6:56:53 PM PST by ElPatriota (Let's not forget, we are all still friends - basically :) - despite our differences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ms. AntiFeminazi

Mitt's a good guy. For him to be ridiculed and slammed by someone that is carrying a ton of unethical baggage around makes me laugh.

I don't personally think he can win for a number of reasons, but you have to think that Las Vegas odds are running in his favor as long as EV works against him.


40 posted on 12/10/2006 7:20:24 PM PST by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson