Position Paper: The Right's Attack on Sex

All good points--really isn't much more to say..

On that note, a little "lighter side"

"The Right's attack on Sex"

Well, we did beat up on vier and funf pretty bad. So, what's next? Sechs...

Maybe later we'll tackle sieben, acht, neun, and zehn when we get to it...

(couldn't resist)...8^)

...children might be sexual beings and experience authentic questions about sex issues at different developmental stages...

Children might be sexual beings, huh? Talk about pro-pedophilia psychobabble. Why not just come out and say that buggering little kids is OK? (Oh, wait, that would be playing into the hands of the "right," who actually asserts that many gays believe it...)

In a secular sense, homosexuality is an idolatry of perversion. It is in no way an anatomical function of the human organism, but a phantasmagoric creation from within the mentally disturbed human mind, a social psychosis, naked and on full exhibitionist display.

Homosexual monogamy advocates seek ceremonious sanctification of their anatomical perversions and esoteric absolution for their guilt-ridden, impoverished egos.

Neither of those will satisfy their universal dissatisfaction with mortality or connect them to something eternal. With pantheons of fantasies as their medium of infinitization, they still have nothing in them of reality, any more than there is in the things that seem to stand before us in a dream.

Many will seek ceremonious sanctification and esoteric absolution in some type of marriage rite, but that still fails to give them a connection to the eternal in both a religious and temporal, procreant sense - - the union does not produce offspring.

Dissatisfaction with inevitable mortality only feeds the impoverishment of the ego further. Homosexuals really hate human life; their whole desire is rooted in the destruction of it...

Homosexual deviancy is really a pagan practice (and a self-induced social psychosis) at war with the Judaic culture over what is written in the book of Genesis (1:27, 2:18). This is exactly what the National Socialists were at war with... so, when someone uses the term "Gaystapo," they might not realize how close to the truth they really are.

"There are historical differences in the ways in which gay male communities and lesbian communities have addressed questions of sex and sexuality related, in part, to the different ways in which men and women are socialized and the long history of sexual violence against girls and women. While neither gay men or lesbians are of one mind on sexual matters, at times sex controversies have divided our movement pretty much along gender lines. At the same time, both lesbian and gay male communities have sustained long term internal battles about the position of sex in the movement. These matters have often involved specific gay male subcultures and sexual spaces such as debates over sex in parks, bathhouses and sex clubs, and leather bars."

IMHO, I've had to keep reading this over and over again to try and understand what part of "sex in parks, bathhouses and sex clubs, and leather bars" might not be construed as somehow associated with sex and perversion. I'm still not getting the perspective of the author, ...and quite truthfully, I don't think I want to....

So, you are saying all men are promiscuous? Proving the point they make that to protect children they should be kept away from all male family members?

Do you not see the very dangerous rantings here about children and the concept that they 'need information' about sex to 'protect themselves?'

This is nothing more than a thinly-veiled NAMBLA agenda. P-yew.

This article was written by a homosexual activist. Joseph posted it in the "know thine enemy" category.

I don't think all men are promiscuous! But the author is revealing the truth that the vast majority of homosexual men are indeed promiscuous.

This article is highly revealing and I hope all the pro-homosexual cheerleaders on FR read it. I keep posting links to it on other threads so they'll come here and read it. But they're chickens**t.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.