Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Generation is All They Need
Toronto Star ^ | December 10 2006 | Kevin Haggerty

Posted on 12/11/2006 9:36:29 AM PST by bigdcaldavis

One day we will all happily be implanted with microchips, and our every move will be monitored. The technology exists; the only barrier is society's resistance to the loss of privacy

By the time my four-year-old son is swathed in the soft flesh of old age, he will likely find it unremarkable that he and almost everyone he knows will be permanently implanted with a microchip. Automatically tracking his location in real time, it will connect him with databases monitoring and recording his smallest behavioural traits.

Most people anticipate such a prospect with a sense of horrified disbelief, dismissing it as a science-fiction fantasy. The technology, however, already exists. For years humane societies have implanted all the pets that leave their premises with a small identifying microchip. As well, millions of consumer goods are now traced with tiny radio frequency identification chips that allow satellites to reveal their exact location.

A select group of people are already "chipped" with devices that automatically open doors, turn on lights, and perform other low-level miracles. Prominent among such individuals is researcher Kevin Warwick of Reading University in England; Warwick is a leading proponent of the almost limitless potential uses for such chips.

Other users include the patrons of the Baja Beach Club in Barcelona, many of whom have paid about $150 (U.S.) for the privilege of being implanted with an identifying chip that allows them to bypass lengthy club queues and purchase drinks by being scanned. These individuals are the advance guard of an effort to expand the technology as widely as possible.

From this point forward, microchips will become progressively smaller, less invasive, and easier to deploy. Thus, any realistic barrier to the wholesale "chipping" of Western citizens is not technological but cultural. It relies upon the visceral reaction against the prospect of being personally marked as one component in a massive human inventory.

Today we might strongly hold such beliefs, but sensibilities can, and probably will, change. How this remarkable attitudinal transformation is likely to occur is clear to anyone who has paid attention to privacy issues over the past quarter-century. There will be no 3 a.m. knock on the door by storm troopers come to force implants into our bodies. The process will be more subtle and cumulative, couched in the unassailable language of progress and social betterment, and mimicking many of the processes that have contributed to the expansion of closed-circuit television cameras and the corporate market in personal data.

A series of tried and tested strategies will be marshalled to familiarize citizens with the technology. These will be coupled with efforts to pressure tainted social groups and entice the remainder of the population into being chipped.

This, then, is how the next generation will come to be microchipped.

It starts in distant countries. Having tested the technology on guinea pigs, both human and animal, the first widespread use of human implanting will occur in nations at the periphery of the Western world. Such developments are important in their own right, but their international significance pertains to how they familiarize a global audience with the technology and habituate them to the idea that chipping represents a potential future.

An increasing array of hypothetical chipping scenarios will also be depicted in entertainment media, furthering the familiarization process.

In the West, chips will first be implanted in members of stigmatized groups. Pedophiles are the leading candidate for this distinction, although it could start with terrorists, drug dealers, or whatever happens to be that year's most vilified criminals. Short-lived promises will be made that the technology will only be used on the "worst of the worst." In fact, the wholesale chipping of incarcerated individuals will quickly ensue, encompassing people on probation and on parole.

Even accused individuals will be tagged, a measure justified on the grounds that it would stop them from fleeing justice. Many prisoners will welcome this development, since only chipped inmates will be eligible for parole, weekend release, or community sentences. From the prison system will emerge an evocative vocabulary distinguishing chippers from non-chippers.

Although the chips will be justified as a way to reduce fraud and other crimes, criminals will almost immediately develop techniques to simulate other people's chip codes and manipulate their data.

The comparatively small size of the incarcerated population, however, means that prisons would be simply a brief stopover on a longer voyage. Commercial success is contingent on making serious inroads into tagging the larger population of law-abiding citizens. Other stigmatized groups will therefore be targeted. This will undoubtedly entail monitoring welfare recipients, a move justified to reduce fraud, enhance efficiency, and ensure that the poor do not receive "undeserved" benefits.

Once e-commerce is sufficiently advanced, welfare recipients will receive their benefits as electronic vouchers stored on their microchips, a policy that will be tinged with a sense of righteousness, as it will help ensure that clients can only purchase government-approved goods from select merchants, reducing the always disconcerting prospect that poor people might use their limited funds to purchase alcohol or tobacco.

Civil libertarians will try to foster a debate on these developments. Their attempts to prohibit chipping will be handicapped by the inherent difficulty in animating public sympathy for criminals and welfare recipients — groups that many citizens are only too happy to see subjected to tighter regulation. Indeed, the lesser public concern for such groups is an inherent part of the unarticulated rationale for why coerced chipping will be disproportionately directed at the stigmatized.

The official privacy arm of the government will now take up the issue. Mandated to determine the legality of such initiatives, privacy commissioners and Senate Committees will produce a forest of reports presented at an archipelago of international conferences. Hampered by lengthy research and publication timelines, their findings will be delivered long after the widespread adoption of chipping is effectively a fait accompli. The research conclusions on the effectiveness of such technologies will be mixed and open to interpretation.

Officials will vociferously reassure the chipping industry that they do not oppose chipping itself, which has fast become a growing commercial sector. Instead, they are simply seeking to ensure that the technology is used fairly and that data on the chips is not misused. New policies will be drafted.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What might Hitler, Mao or Milosevic have accomplished if their citizens were chipped, coded, and remotely monitored? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Employers will start to expect implants as a condition of getting a job. The U.S. military will lead the way, requiring chips for all soldiers as a means to enhance battlefield command and control — and to identify human remains. From cooks to commandos, every one of the more than one million U.S. military personnel will see microchips replace their dog tags.

Following quickly behind will be the massive security sector. Security guards, police officers, and correctional workers will all be expected to have a chip. Individuals with sensitive jobs will find themselves in the same position.

The first signs of this stage are already apparent. In 2004, the Mexican attorney general's office started implanting employees to restrict access to secure areas. The category of "sensitive occupation" will be expansive to the point that anyone with a job that requires keys, a password, security clearance, or identification badge will have those replaced by a chip.

Judges hearing cases on the constitutionality of these measures will conclude that chipping policies are within legal limits. The thin veneer of "voluntariness" coating many of these programs will allow the judiciary to maintain that individuals are not being coerced into using the technology.

In situations where the chips are clearly forced on people, the judgments will deem them to be undeniable infringements of the right to privacy. However, they will then invoke the nebulous and historically shifting standard of "reasonableness" to pronounce coerced chipping a reasonable infringement on privacy rights in a context of demands for governmental efficiency and the pressing need to enhance security in light of the still ongoing wars on terror, drugs, and crime.

At this juncture, an unfortunately common tragedy of modern life will occur: A small child, likely a photogenic toddler, will be murdered or horrifically abused. It will happen in one of the media capitals of the Western world, thereby ensuring non-stop breathless coverage. Chip manufactures will recognize this as the opportunity they have been anticipating for years. With their technology now largely bug-free, familiar to most citizens and comparatively inexpensive, manufacturers will partner with the police to launch a high-profile campaign encouraging parents to implant their children "to ensure your own peace of mind."

Special deals will be offered. Implants will be free, providing the family registers for monitoring services. Loving but unnerved parents will be reassured by the ability to integrate tagging with other functions on their PDA so they can see their child any time from any place.

Paralleling these developments will be initiatives that employ the logic of convenience to entice the increasingly small group of holdouts to embrace the now common practice of being tagged. At first, such convenience tagging will be reserved for the highest echelon of Western society, allowing the elite to move unencumbered through the physical and informational corridors of power. Such practices will spread more widely as the benefits of being chipped become more prosaic. Chipped individuals will, for example, move more rapidly through customs.

Indeed, it will ultimately become a condition of using mass-transit systems that officials be allowed to monitor your chip. Companies will offer discounts to individuals who pay by using funds stored on their embedded chip, on the small-print condition that the merchant can access large swaths of their personal data. These "discounts" are effectively punitive pricing schemes, charging unchipped individuals more as a way to encourage them to submit to monitoring. Corporations will seek out the personal data in hopes of producing ever more fine-grained customer profiles for marketing purposes, and to sell to other institutions.

By this point all major organizations will be looking for opportunities to capitalize on the possibilities inherent in an almost universally chipped population. The uses of chips proliferate, as do the types of discounts. Each new generation of household technology becomes configured to operate by interacting with a person's chip.

Finding a computer or appliance that will run though old-fashioned "hands-on"' interactions becomes progressively more difficult and costly. Patients in hospitals and community care will be routinely chipped, allowing medical staff — or, more accurately, remote computers — to monitor their biological systems in real time.

Eager to reduce the health costs associated with a largely docile citizenry, authorities will provide tax incentives to individuals who exercise regularly. Personal chips will be remotely monitored to ensure that their heart rate is consistent with an exercise regime.

By now, the actual process of "chipping" for many individuals will simply involve activating certain functions of their existing chip. Any prospect of removing the chip will become increasingly untenable, as having a chip will be a precondition for engaging in the main dynamics of modern life, such as shopping, voting, and driving.

The remaining holdouts will grow increasingly weary of Luddite jokes and subtle accusations that they have something to hide. Exasperated at repeatedly watching neighbours bypass them in "chipped" lines while they remain subject to the delays, inconveniences, and costs reserved for the unchipped, they too will choose the path of least resistance and get an implant.

In one generation, then, the cultural distaste many might see as an innate reaction to the prospect of having our bodies marked like those of an inmate in a concentration camp will likely fade.

In the coming years some of the most powerful institutional actors in society will start to align themselves to entice, coerce, and occasionally compel the next generation to get an implant.

Now, therefore, is the time to contemplate the unprecedented dangers of this scenario. The most serious of these concern how even comparatively stable modern societies will, in times of fear, embrace treacherous promises. How would the prejudices of a Joe McCarthy, J. Edgar Hoover, or of southern Klansmen — all of whom were deeply integrated into the American political establishment — have manifest themselves in such a world? What might Hitler, Mao or Milosevic have accomplished if their citizens were chipped, coded, and remotely monitored?

Choirs of testimonials will soon start to sing the virtues of implants. Calm reassurances will be forthcoming about democratic traditions, the rule of law, and privacy rights. History, unfortunately, shows that things can go disastrously wrong, and that this happens with disconcerting regularity. Little in the way of international agreements, legality, or democratic sensibilities has proved capable of thwarting single-minded ruthlessness.

"It can't happen here" has become the whispered swan song of the disappeared. Best to contemplate these dystopian potentials before we proffer the tender forearms of our sons and daughters. While we cannot anticipate all of the positive advantages that might be derived from this technology, the negative prospects are almost too terrifying to contemplate.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; microchips; rfid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Pay close attention to "In the coming years some of the most powerful institutional actors in society will start to align themselves to entice, coerce, and occasionally compel the next generation to get an implant." Because MSM will sell implantable microchips as "cool" and "hip" and "trendy" and "stylish" and even "sexy".

RFID implants will create a new class of "outcasts" in the government indoctrination centers (public schools). Un-chipped students will be bullied on a constant basis by chipped students to the point where one of the un-chipped students decides to take a gun to school and kill the chipped students. Then you will see public schools requiring an implantable microchip for all students...then of course the ACLU will get some neolib judge to declare that private schools must chip their students as well.

1 posted on 12/11/2006 9:36:32 AM PST by bigdcaldavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

That's what the tinfoil is for...


2 posted on 12/11/2006 9:46:19 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

They will start chipping the kiddos to make the abducted ones easier to find. Then criminals. Then you.


3 posted on 12/11/2006 9:48:52 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

Good post.

The first "chippers" will implant themselves voluntarily in order to bypass security checks at airports, customs lines, checkout counters, etc. After that, the underclasses will want to be chipped in order to have the same perks. The criminals and poor will be the last to be implanted. At some point, the absence of a chip will mark an individual as somewhat suspect, the same way that no credit cards would stigmatize and inconvenience a person today.


4 posted on 12/11/2006 9:49:41 AM PST by massadvj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Same old Sh*t, different decade...


5 posted on 12/11/2006 9:49:42 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

Oh My God,(hysterically loading pistol) they are coming
for us arent they?


6 posted on 12/11/2006 9:57:06 AM PST by claptrap (We've found a Witch can we burn her?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

Eventually your chipping after birth will become the moment you acheive "personhood" and therefore are entitlment to "human" rights. Can you say Logan's Run?

Oh yeah, there's that whole Mark of the Beast in the end times thing too.


7 posted on 12/11/2006 9:57:50 AM PST by curtish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

bump for later read.


8 posted on 12/11/2006 9:58:29 AM PST by Redcitizen (My other OmniMech is a Masakari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis
One day we will all happily be implanted with microchips, and our every move will be monitored.

Except for illegal immigrants. They will be exempt. Welcome to the Twilight Zone of governmental insanity.

9 posted on 12/11/2006 10:01:34 AM PST by guitfiddlist (When the 'Rats break out switchblades, it's no time to invoke Robert's Rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen

The new 007 gets chipped in the movie...


10 posted on 12/11/2006 10:02:13 AM PST by COBOL2Java ("No stronger retrograde force exists in the world" - Winston Churchill on Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis
millions of consumer goods are now traced with tiny radio frequency identification chips that allow satellites to reveal their exact location

I call BS right here. Most RFID tags are passive, meaning (1) a RFID tag reader needs to be reasonably close to the tag to be able to energize it, and (2) the only information on the tag is a product ID and/or serial number, which is meaningless without reference to a database. The DoD is looking at active RFID tags that will track GPS location, temperature, shock, etc., but the price of these active tags are much more than the $0.05 (or so) that WalMart needs to make RFID tags cost-effective in their operations.

11 posted on 12/11/2006 10:03:32 AM PST by Fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis
Indeed, it will ultimately become a condition of using mass-transit systems that officials be allowed to monitor your chip.

Our government leaders are already going down this path with the E-pass for vehicles. Soon, and I mean very soon, you will not be able to use toll-roads without a pre-purchased electronic device that allows access to the roads (and the ability to track our movements). Notice that toll roads have drive through lanes for e-pass holders and that the sloths (like me!) that choose to pay cash are made to sit through long lines.

12 posted on 12/11/2006 10:04:42 AM PST by subterfuge (Today, Tolerance =greatest virtue;Hypocrisy=worst character defect; Discrimination =worst atrocity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

The RFID chip will be used to ID the remains when we finally drop dead of old age or boredom. The only way to get rid of it would be cremation. The freezing method would not work.


13 posted on 12/11/2006 10:07:54 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

Hmm...you know, I could swear I've read this whole article a long time ago before any chips ever existed...

Oh right, here it is:

"The Revelation of Saint John the Devine"
"13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name."


14 posted on 12/11/2006 10:21:32 AM PST by BlackSeal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackSeal

"or the number of his name."

I've always found this part fascinating, in relation to Social Security numbers.

Or the 'number' of your 'name'.


15 posted on 12/11/2006 10:31:25 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BlackSeal
"13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name."

100 years ago this was laughed off by the Bible Skeptic as absurd and impossible, but tis not so far-fetched today, eh?

16 posted on 12/11/2006 10:33:31 AM PST by jimmyray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fudd

True, they are conflating the stock RFID chip with the larger, different technology of "Digital Angel" if I am remembering the company properly. But having local readers that feed into some kind of uplink would be about the same thing.


17 posted on 12/11/2006 10:34:34 AM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ikka
But having local readers that feed into some kind of uplink would be about the same thing.

The winning team in a 2005 computer applications contest, the Network for Endangered Animal Tracking (NEAT), combined radio collars (for wolves) and a wireless network in the forest to track their travels and activities. The winning team in this global competition included my freshly minted son-in-law!

18 posted on 12/11/2006 10:45:12 AM PST by TomSmedley (Calvinist, optimist, home schooling dad, exuberant husband, technical writer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis
I don't doubt that the Dems would try to push this.

They should be careful what they wish for. This would make voter fraud increasingly difficult.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

19 posted on 12/11/2006 10:47:37 AM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fudd

How long do you think it will be before the technology catches up? I give it 10 years max. It's not going to stop there, the Borg, 'hive mind' technology will be right behind it.


20 posted on 12/11/2006 11:05:35 AM PST by Free Vulcan (Show them no mercy, for you shall receive none!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson