Posted on 12/11/2006 3:55:47 PM PST by RWR8189
And no problems with lesbian lovers having children?
I thought we needed more children.
How about the male whose sperm is producing this off spring
What a creep
Responsible for bring a child into the world and then taking NO responsibilty for its upbringing etc etc
yeah, religious people are such a bother. They always want to talk about values and some people strongly disagree with them. It is so disturbing.
Let's start a political movement to get rid of all religious people. We'll call it Communism. And then . . .
"Really? And I suppose you think fatherless homes are a good idea?"
I'm waiting for this answer also....waiting...waiting....
Is the issue so much two women raising a child together or that they are lesbians? What if a child were raised with a mom and dad at first, then something happened to dad? Then, let's supposed the child was going to be raised by his mom and a non-gay female relative? Is it different because dad was around for a while?
Would you address the article, instead of just throwing out ad hominem? It makes some important points, IMO.
What it is going to be a threesome with the sperm donor gettin one weekend a month
It is called being selfish because in your case you present it wasn't known the father wouldn't be there
Sometimes Torie the truth hurts.
Get over it.
What about if there was a lovely lady,who was bringing up three very lovely girls. (All of them had hair of gold, like their mother. The youngest one in curls.)
And then there was a man man named Brady. Who was busy with three boys of his own. They were four men, living all together. Yet they were all alone.
But one day the lady met this fellow. And they knew that it was much more than a hunch. That this group would somehow form a family.
That's the way they all became the Brady Bunch.
"One Dobson is one too many."
An intelligent rebuttal to his statements.
People..think about it...A human borne from a turkey baster and a petrie dish. Not from a physical union of love, and definately not as God or the Universe intended.
You must agree this is the ultimate act of selfishness right??
I don't know - you are the one that said he was not taking responsibility, now is that in the article, do you have inside information, or are you just making it up?
Marcia, Marcia, Marcia!
Definately not as God or the Universe intended.
Then why did he allow for the invention of petrie dishes and turkey basters?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.