Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hamas Confirms Meeting with American Democrats [Confirmation Of WND Article...Senior Demoncrats]
Yonni The Blogger/IsrealNN.com ^ | Dec. 12, 2006 | Yoni Tidi

Posted on 12/12/2006 8:21:56 AM PST by conservativecorner

(IsraelNN.com) Hamas officials have confirmed a WorldNetDaily report that terrorist organization leaders recently met with senior Democratic party members after the recent sweep of both houses of Congress in last month's American elections. The independent Arab news agency Ma'an quoted Ahmed Yousef, an aide to prime minister of the Palestinian Authority (PA) Ismail Haniyeh as saying the meeting was held. However, a Democratic National Committee spokeswoman said she has no knowledge that the meeting took place.

Details were withheld in order not to damage the image of the Democratic party, he added. Yousef said that Hamas leaders also spoke to leaders of key European countries, including British Members of Parliament.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 200611; 2006elections; ahmedyousef; democratparty; democrats; dnc; hamas; inbedwiththeenemy; ismailhaniyeh; syria; syriantrip; syriatrip
IsraelNN.com
1 posted on 12/12/2006 8:22:00 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Real nice.....was Uncle Teddy there?


2 posted on 12/12/2006 8:24:15 AM PST by alice_in_bubbaland (New Jersey gets the corrupt government it deserves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Details were withheld in order not to damage the image of the Democratic party, he added.
------
Image? What image? Other than exactly what they are. Just another glaring testimony.


3 posted on 12/12/2006 8:24:17 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Details were withheld in order not to damage the image of the Democratic party,

If this was a Republican you would of posted it. Give us details!


4 posted on 12/12/2006 8:24:29 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Hamas says "yes," the DNC takes the Sgt. Schultz defense: "We know nothing." It's an amazing state of affairs when a terrorist organization is more believable than the Democrat Party.


5 posted on 12/12/2006 8:25:52 AM PST by My2Cents (Scrape the Bottom. Vote for Rodham.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Once again, can anyone say "traitors?"


6 posted on 12/12/2006 8:25:54 AM PST by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner



With Olmert being weak as new born kitten, the "fix" might be in on Israel.

The dhimmicrats have no shame and no backbone, Israel might get screwed soon.


7 posted on 12/12/2006 8:26:02 AM PST by padre35 (We are surrounded, that simplifies our problem Chesty Puller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
However, a Democratic National Committee spokeswoman said she has no knowledge that the meeting took place.

That statement is inherently different from 'No such meeting took place.' I thought that looked like a Hamas hat that Obama was wearing on MNF last night!

8 posted on 12/12/2006 8:26:28 AM PST by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

"Details were withheld in order not to damage the image of the Democratic party, he added."

Oh, no need to worry about us. No surprise here. Paging Claude Rains.


9 posted on 12/12/2006 8:28:57 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Kennedy was in Europe not long ago. I remember because I thought it had something to do with the lawsuit against Rummy filed in Germany.

First the Soviets against Reagan, now this. Our side better shove it down their throats.


10 posted on 12/12/2006 8:29:03 AM PST by HelloooClareece ("We make war that we may live in peace". Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

It's an amazing state of affairs when a terrorist organization is more believable than the Democrat Party.
-------
So who again are America's worst enemies? By their own actions, the voters asked for it, and they got it.


11 posted on 12/12/2006 8:29:05 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

As a taxpaying American Citizen, I demand to know who these "senior Democrat" officials are and what they thought they were going to achieve.

What media outlets covered this up to let the DemonRATS get away with this too???


12 posted on 12/12/2006 8:29:31 AM PST by Paige ("Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." --George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

And the unbelievable part is that people will be surprised when it makes it's way to the sheeple. The voted the demoncrats in a month or so ago, and yet they will be surprised. It reminds me of Nicaragua only in the ME. Never an evil people not embraced by these folks, and people will be surprised.


13 posted on 12/12/2006 8:30:17 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan

"she has no knowledge that the meeting took place."

Who would have knowledge?


14 posted on 12/12/2006 8:30:21 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

I don't trust these sources, be skeptical people!


15 posted on 12/12/2006 8:31:12 AM PST by Raymann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan

Words really are powerful tools BUMP! :>)!!!


16 posted on 12/12/2006 8:31:30 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: padre35
The dhimmicrats have no shame and no backbone, Israel might get screwed soon.

Honestly, the Israeli's are destroying themselves. There's no need to blame anyone else.

17 posted on 12/12/2006 8:32:06 AM PST by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

How in the hell is not considered a "treason" act?


18 posted on 12/12/2006 8:32:11 AM PST by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

So, the Dems are getting ready to sell out to Hamas. On the hush-hush, of course.


19 posted on 12/12/2006 8:33:15 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner


Not surprised.


20 posted on 12/12/2006 8:33:52 AM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Never an evil people not embraced by these folks, and people will be surprised.

The people generally get the government they deserve. I look around and see that a lot of Americans deserve to be the slaves they are and they deserve to be the dhimmis they will become.

21 posted on 12/12/2006 8:36:42 AM PST by MichiganConservative (The US is so full of domestic enemies, maybe all we can do is slow the inevitable ascent of tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Raymann
LOL! Let's see. You have WND, Hamas and now IsrealNN.com reporting this, and a demoncratic spokesperson has "no knoweldge of any meeting taking place", and you want to counter how? Let me say I'm thrilled as peaches that you are unimpressed, but do you have ANYONE in the demoncrat party ready to go on record as saying definitively that no meeting took place?
22 posted on 12/12/2006 8:37:45 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan

Howard Dean still wearing his Arafat costume?
"We must talk to our enemies"
WTF?


23 posted on 12/12/2006 8:37:49 AM PST by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pctech

I can HOLLER "traitors!"--but I'd sure like to know which 'Rats went over there. I have some guesses, but I'd like to know for certain which ones did this.


24 posted on 12/12/2006 8:40:45 AM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Add the Congressional Hamas Caucus to the tribal system known as the Democrat Party.


25 posted on 12/12/2006 8:41:27 AM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Howlin; Congressman Billybob; patton; ConservaTexan
However, a Democratic National Committee spokeswoman said she has no knowledge that the meeting took place.
That statement is inherently different from 'No such meeting took place.'

Yes.


VERY very different. Plausible denial-ability merely means the spokesperson DIDN'T know about the meeting.

And, notice the MSM DOESN'T see fit to investigate nor report on this.
26 posted on 12/12/2006 8:50:17 AM PST by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
And the unbelievable part is that people will be surprised when it makes it's way to the sheeple.

Probably not. Most of those voters won't have much of a grasp on what Hamas is, anyway.

27 posted on 12/12/2006 8:52:34 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
And the unbelievable part is that people will be surprised when it makes it's way to the sheeple.

Probably not. Most of those voters won't have much of a grasp on what Hamas is, anyway.

28 posted on 12/12/2006 8:52:35 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
It's an amazing state of affairs when a terrorist organization is more believable than the Democrat Party.

That sentence is so confusing, I think my head's going to explode trying to parse it.

;-)

29 posted on 12/12/2006 8:55:07 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

"And, notice the MSM DOESN'T see fit to investigate nor report on this."

What's needed is a conservative press service.


30 posted on 12/12/2006 8:55:42 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Oh Wow, this story is finally getting the attention it deserves from the BSM. Should see 15 min updates on the screen any time now.

In other news, a large herd of pigs was seen flying over the capitol today.....


31 posted on 12/12/2006 8:56:34 AM PST by prov1813man (While the one you despise and ridicule works to protect you, those you embrace work to destroy you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Howard Dean has been in Europe I wonder which other ones...


32 posted on 12/12/2006 8:57:16 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Kucinich, Vilsak, Obama, Biden, Bayh, Dodd, & Edwards the 7 dwarves to Snow Rodham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

When will the Democrats in the Congress stop usurping the powers of the Executive Branch?


33 posted on 12/12/2006 8:57:19 AM PST by ElectricStrawberry (27th Infantry Regiment...cut in half during the Clinton years....Nec Aspera Terrent!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1
How in the hell is not considered a "treason" act?

That's what I want to know. Wouldn't this constitute talking with a "terrorist group". Isn't that illegal?

34 posted on 12/12/2006 9:03:21 AM PST by The Blitherer ("I will prepare and some day my chance will come.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Shouldn't be too hard to find out who they are. A little investigation of what dimwit traveled to that area of the world around the same time.
35 posted on 12/12/2006 9:06:42 AM PST by processing please hold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry

Can you say NEVER?


36 posted on 12/12/2006 9:10:09 AM PST by Edgerunner (Better RED than DEAD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Let me see?????Over 70% (+/-) of American Jews vote democrap? What is wrong with this picture?


37 posted on 12/12/2006 9:11:18 AM PST by mosaicwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HelloooClareece
Our side better shove it down their throats

LOL - the spineless republicans, you mean? They'll sweep this under the rug like they've done about everything else the dim traitors have done to screw this country, all in the name of preserving 'bipartisan dialog'.

The republican party has devolved into nothing but a bunch of limp noodles afraid of their own shadows.
38 posted on 12/12/2006 9:13:04 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (A liberal is a suicide bomber without the guts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
LIAR! LIAR!

"WHOSE PANTS IS ON FIRE?"

39 posted on 12/12/2006 9:20:45 AM PST by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
By their own actions, the voters asked for it, and they got it.

50.01%* of the voters, anyway.

Brownian Motion would create a greater statistical spread than decided the election so "overwhelmingly" for the Dims.



*[exaggerating for effect; genuine percentage unknown, but very small...
a few hundred votes in one or two contested Congressional districts, a thousand or so in a few others; by unanimously carrying a graveyard precinct here & there; by 'finding' a stuffed ballot box in another....]

40 posted on 12/12/2006 9:36:29 AM PST by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
Any bets on who is was?

I'm sure a simple lookup of travel expenses or a FOIA request could clear the up given the timing.
41 posted on 12/12/2006 9:53:18 AM PST by FreedomNeocon (Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HelloooClareece

"Our side better shove it down their throats."

"Our side" doesn't know where the throat is and thinks that shoving is not sportsmanlike.



42 posted on 12/12/2006 10:03:12 AM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan

"Details were withheld in order not to damage the image of the Democratic party, he added...However, a Democratic National Committee spokeswoman said she has no knowledge that the meeting took place."

Yup...we're being made decide which outfit -- Hamas or the Democratic Party -- would be more likely to tell lies in order to achieve its agenda. Now THAT's a tough call...


43 posted on 12/12/2006 10:33:17 AM PST by Clioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Raymann

Raymann, you should've long ago figured out that most folks around here would take O.J.'s word as the Gospel truth if he was saying something bad about Democrats.


44 posted on 12/12/2006 10:35:15 AM PST by lugsoul (Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Clioman

Well, why would Hamas make up a story about meeting with Democrats?


45 posted on 12/12/2006 10:36:43 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Clioman

If Hamas made up a false story, it could be easily refuted -and it hasn't been refuted.


46 posted on 12/12/2006 10:38:35 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
And, notice the MSM DOESN'T see fit to investigate nor report on this.

Democrats’ New Intelligence Chairman Needs a Crash Course on al Qaeda

Maybe, but this story was on the WABC-AM 770 in NYC radio news, besides the talk shows, plenty last night. I was surprised, to say the least. If you haven't heard, he was clueless.

47 posted on 12/12/2006 10:53:33 AM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Clioman
Now THAT's a tough call...

At least Hamas is up front about who they want to destroy!

48 posted on 12/12/2006 10:58:47 AM PST by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly; neverdem; Howlin
Actually, I see it more that Hamas is BOASTING about talking the democrats (before the election, after the election, despite the (next) election!) BECAUSE that gives them power over Israel in the next two years.

"Israel! Look out for us because WE are already talking to the people who will vote on YOUR money in the US Congress, regardless of what he (Bush) says."
49 posted on 12/12/2006 11:09:50 AM PST by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson