Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. McDermott Violated Ethics Rules
NewsMax ^ | December 12, 2006 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 12/12/2006 12:03:31 PM PST by Kaslin

Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., violated ethics standards by giving reporters access to an illegally taped telephone call involving Republican leaders a decade ago, the House ethics committee said Monday.

McDermott, who at the time was the panel's senior Democrat, failed to meet his obligations as a committee leader, said a report released two days after Congress adjourned for the year. The panel took no action other than the report.

"Rep. McDermott's secretive disclosures to the news media . . . risked undermining the ethics process regarding" former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, the committee said. It said McDermott's actions "were not consistent with the spirit of the committee's rules."

The ethics complaint stems from a tape recording made by a Florida couple, who gave it to McDermott in January 1997. The tape recorded then-Speaker Gingrich, R-Ga., in a December 1996 conference call with GOP leaders regarding a separate ethics investigation of Gingrich.

McDermott leaked the tape to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and The New York Times, which published stories on the case in January 1997.

Gingrich, who was heard on the call telling House Republicans how to react to the ethics charges against him, was later fined $300,000 and reprimanded by the House.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled against McDermott in a related civil case in March. The 2-1 opinion upheld a lower court ruling that McDermott had violated the rights of Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, who was heard on the 1996 call. Boehner, then a Gingrich lieutenant, is now House majority leader.

The full nine-member appeals court vacated the three-judge ruling this spring and heard new arguments in the case in October. A ruling is expected next year.

McDermott, in an e-mail to The Associated Press, said he was pleased the ethics panel had concluded he did not violate overall House rules.

"I am also pleased with the committee's acknowledgment that pending litigation in the federal court will decide the question of law over the First Amendment issues involved," he said.

Because of the pending civil case, McDermott said he would not offer additional comment.

Rep. David Hobson, R-Ohio, a former ethics committee member who filed a complaint against McDermott in November 2004, said he was disappointed the ethics panel did not sanction McDermott.

"I'm not sure this decision reflects well upon the House as a whole or the ethics process," Hobson said.

He said he might change his long-standing support for an internal ethics panel and consider replacing it with an independent inspector general to investigate House members.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: 109th; congress; corruption; cultureofcorruption; democratscandals; ethics; mcdermott; mostethical; violated
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
And Pelosi claims to put in the most ethical congress
1 posted on 12/12/2006 12:03:32 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Already Pelosi has tried to install a HIGHLY corrupt Congress --- but what is new for the liberal socialists???


2 posted on 12/12/2006 12:05:42 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Now this is why I am mad at republicans. They are stupid, yellow bellied, weak kneed POS (that's plural) who let this languish for all these years.

If this had been a republican, you can bet the demoKaRatz would have had his head on a spike and he would have been gone and in prison.

Why are republicans so WEEEEEAAAAAAKKKKK!


3 posted on 12/12/2006 12:09:11 PM PST by Al Gator (Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Resign, McDermott. Where's Pelosi on this?


4 posted on 12/12/2006 12:10:08 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
McDermott, in an e-mail to The Associated Press, said he was pleased the ethics panel had concluded he did not violate overall House rules.

He did violate the ECPA. But that's just a federal law, obviously meant for commoners, not the House of Lords.

5 posted on 12/12/2006 12:10:59 PM PST by thulldud ("Para inglÚs, oprima el dos.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., violated ethics standards by giving reporters access to an illegally taped telephone call involving Republican leaders a decade ago, the House ethics committee said Monday.

A decade ago? These guys are right on top of things. Very inspriring.

6 posted on 12/12/2006 12:11:01 PM PST by IamConservative (Any man who agrees with you on everything, also lies to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al Gator
Nine frigging years to figure out something everyone knew about a week after it happened. We live in the twilight zone.
7 posted on 12/12/2006 12:12:07 PM PST by Post5203 (Murtha and Kerry: Pull out before the job is done...AKA Premature Evacuation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

"The ethics complaint stems from a tape recording made by a Florida couple, who gave it to McDermott in January 1997."

It amazes me that anyone still believes this part of the story.


8 posted on 12/12/2006 12:13:01 PM PST by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: thulldud
He also maintained his composure under the Demoncraps C.E.O.F. rules.

Cover

Each

Others

Fannies!

10 posted on 12/12/2006 12:15:05 PM PST by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Member in good standing of The Democrat Crime Syndicate.


11 posted on 12/12/2006 12:16:30 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BADROTOFINGER

WA ping request


12 posted on 12/12/2006 12:17:56 PM PST by sionnsar (?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther

Obviously as we learned from Dennis Hastert, Republicans also cover Democrats' Fannies.


13 posted on 12/12/2006 12:18:14 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

U.S. senators Eni Faleomavaega of American Samoa (4th L), Jim McDermott of Washington (5th L) and Michael Honda of California (2nd from R) pose with South Korea's lawmakers and officials in front of the headquarter of the Kaesong Industrial Park in the North Korean border city of Kaesong, about 70 km (45 miles) northwest of South Korean capital Seoul in this December 1, 2006 handout photo. The three U.S. lawmakers crossed into to North Korea on Friday to visit the industrial park in North Korea, local media reported. - REUTERS/Unification Ministry/Handout (NORTH KOREA).


14 posted on 12/12/2006 12:18:59 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Merry Something PC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Post5203

You got that right. You have to wonder why the ratz keep getting away this stuff. Sandypants Burgler, Algore "ain't no controlin legal authority...."

You can only conclude that republicans are the biggest collection of p***ies ever to stand in one spot.


15 posted on 12/12/2006 12:19:04 PM PST by Al Gator (Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

McDermott broke ‘spirit’ of rules but faces no punishment
http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/121206/mcdermott.html
The Hill - Dec 11 6:10 PM
The House ethics committee found that Rep. Jim McDermott’s (D-Wash.) 1997 leaking of a secretly taped phone call to the media among House Republican leaders, including current Majority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), is “inconsistent with the spirit of the applicable [House] rules.”


16 posted on 12/12/2006 12:20:53 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Merry Something PC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yawn. This should make it to page 33 in the Saturday one star.


17 posted on 12/12/2006 12:21:05 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; thulldud; IamConservative

"A ruling is expected next year."

Ten, no eleven friggin' years to nail this guy????

Let's see.................
DeLay -- GONE
Ney -- GONE
Foley -- GONE
..........................I'm sure there are more


18 posted on 12/12/2006 12:21:21 PM PST by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

These are the actions of a defeated and cowering Republican party. They know that the Democrats are coming in with the slime-maching on full power. ANY dissent will be met with an all-out sliming in the press and in the committee rooms.

The Republicans have already dropped the white flag and are running for cover.


19 posted on 12/12/2006 12:22:16 PM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

"violated ethics standards by giving reporters access to an illegally taped telephone call involving Republican leaders a decade ago"
______________________________________
A decade ago. Foley was gone by the afternoon the story it or am I mistakes?


20 posted on 12/12/2006 12:26:46 PM PST by xowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson