Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. McDermott Violated Ethics Rules
NewsMax ^ | December 12, 2006 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 12/12/2006 12:03:31 PM PST by Kaslin

Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., violated ethics standards by giving reporters access to an illegally taped telephone call involving Republican leaders a decade ago, the House ethics committee said Monday.

McDermott, who at the time was the panel's senior Democrat, failed to meet his obligations as a committee leader, said a report released two days after Congress adjourned for the year. The panel took no action other than the report.

"Rep. McDermott's secretive disclosures to the news media . . . risked undermining the ethics process regarding" former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, the committee said. It said McDermott's actions "were not consistent with the spirit of the committee's rules."

The ethics complaint stems from a tape recording made by a Florida couple, who gave it to McDermott in January 1997. The tape recorded then-Speaker Gingrich, R-Ga., in a December 1996 conference call with GOP leaders regarding a separate ethics investigation of Gingrich.

McDermott leaked the tape to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and The New York Times, which published stories on the case in January 1997.

Gingrich, who was heard on the call telling House Republicans how to react to the ethics charges against him, was later fined $300,000 and reprimanded by the House.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled against McDermott in a related civil case in March. The 2-1 opinion upheld a lower court ruling that McDermott had violated the rights of Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, who was heard on the 1996 call. Boehner, then a Gingrich lieutenant, is now House majority leader.

The full nine-member appeals court vacated the three-judge ruling this spring and heard new arguments in the case in October. A ruling is expected next year.

McDermott, in an e-mail to The Associated Press, said he was pleased the ethics panel had concluded he did not violate overall House rules.

"I am also pleased with the committee's acknowledgment that pending litigation in the federal court will decide the question of law over the First Amendment issues involved," he said.

Because of the pending civil case, McDermott said he would not offer additional comment.

Rep. David Hobson, R-Ohio, a former ethics committee member who filed a complaint against McDermott in November 2004, said he was disappointed the ethics panel did not sanction McDermott.

"I'm not sure this decision reflects well upon the House as a whole or the ethics process," Hobson said.

He said he might change his long-standing support for an internal ethics panel and consider replacing it with an independent inspector general to investigate House members.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: 109th; congress; corruption; cultureofcorruption; democratscandals; ethics; mcdermott; mostethical; violated
And Pelosi claims to put in the most ethical congress
1 posted on 12/12/2006 12:03:32 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Already Pelosi has tried to install a HIGHLY corrupt Congress --- but what is new for the liberal socialists???


2 posted on 12/12/2006 12:05:42 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Now this is why I am mad at republicans. They are stupid, yellow bellied, weak kneed POS (that's plural) who let this languish for all these years.

If this had been a republican, you can bet the demoKaRatz would have had his head on a spike and he would have been gone and in prison.

Why are republicans so WEEEEEAAAAAAKKKKK!


3 posted on 12/12/2006 12:09:11 PM PST by Al Gator (Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Resign, McDermott. Where's Pelosi on this?


4 posted on 12/12/2006 12:10:08 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
McDermott, in an e-mail to The Associated Press, said he was pleased the ethics panel had concluded he did not violate overall House rules.

He did violate the ECPA. But that's just a federal law, obviously meant for commoners, not the House of Lords.

5 posted on 12/12/2006 12:10:59 PM PST by thulldud ("Para inglÚs, oprima el dos.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., violated ethics standards by giving reporters access to an illegally taped telephone call involving Republican leaders a decade ago, the House ethics committee said Monday.

A decade ago? These guys are right on top of things. Very inspriring.

6 posted on 12/12/2006 12:11:01 PM PST by IamConservative (Any man who agrees with you on everything, also lies to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al Gator
Nine frigging years to figure out something everyone knew about a week after it happened. We live in the twilight zone.
7 posted on 12/12/2006 12:12:07 PM PST by Post5203 (Murtha and Kerry: Pull out before the job is done...AKA Premature Evacuation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

"The ethics complaint stems from a tape recording made by a Florida couple, who gave it to McDermott in January 1997."

It amazes me that anyone still believes this part of the story.


8 posted on 12/12/2006 12:13:01 PM PST by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: thulldud
He also maintained his composure under the Demoncraps C.E.O.F. rules.

Cover

Each

Others

Fannies!

10 posted on 12/12/2006 12:15:05 PM PST by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Member in good standing of The Democrat Crime Syndicate.


11 posted on 12/12/2006 12:16:30 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BADROTOFINGER

WA ping request


12 posted on 12/12/2006 12:17:56 PM PST by sionnsar (?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther

Obviously as we learned from Dennis Hastert, Republicans also cover Democrats' Fannies.


13 posted on 12/12/2006 12:18:14 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

U.S. senators Eni Faleomavaega of American Samoa (4th L), Jim McDermott of Washington (5th L) and Michael Honda of California (2nd from R) pose with South Korea's lawmakers and officials in front of the headquarter of the Kaesong Industrial Park in the North Korean border city of Kaesong, about 70 km (45 miles) northwest of South Korean capital Seoul in this December 1, 2006 handout photo. The three U.S. lawmakers crossed into to North Korea on Friday to visit the industrial park in North Korea, local media reported. - REUTERS/Unification Ministry/Handout (NORTH KOREA).


14 posted on 12/12/2006 12:18:59 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Merry Something PC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Post5203

You got that right. You have to wonder why the ratz keep getting away this stuff. Sandypants Burgler, Algore "ain't no controlin legal authority...."

You can only conclude that republicans are the biggest collection of p***ies ever to stand in one spot.


15 posted on 12/12/2006 12:19:04 PM PST by Al Gator (Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

McDermott broke ‘spirit’ of rules but faces no punishment
http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/121206/mcdermott.html
The Hill - Dec 11 6:10 PM
The House ethics committee found that Rep. Jim McDermott’s (D-Wash.) 1997 leaking of a secretly taped phone call to the media among House Republican leaders, including current Majority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), is “inconsistent with the spirit of the applicable [House] rules.”


16 posted on 12/12/2006 12:20:53 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Merry Something PC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yawn. This should make it to page 33 in the Saturday one star.


17 posted on 12/12/2006 12:21:05 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; thulldud; IamConservative

"A ruling is expected next year."

Ten, no eleven friggin' years to nail this guy????

Let's see.................
DeLay -- GONE
Ney -- GONE
Foley -- GONE
..........................I'm sure there are more


18 posted on 12/12/2006 12:21:21 PM PST by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

These are the actions of a defeated and cowering Republican party. They know that the Democrats are coming in with the slime-maching on full power. ANY dissent will be met with an all-out sliming in the press and in the committee rooms.

The Republicans have already dropped the white flag and are running for cover.


19 posted on 12/12/2006 12:22:16 PM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

"violated ethics standards by giving reporters access to an illegally taped telephone call involving Republican leaders a decade ago"
______________________________________
A decade ago. Foley was gone by the afternoon the story it or am I mistakes?


20 posted on 12/12/2006 12:26:46 PM PST by xowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
Resign, McDermott. Where's Pelosi on this?

You can't be serious, McDermott resigning or Pelosi and the other rats asking him to do the honorable thing to do. Only Republicans have to follow rules

21 posted on 12/12/2006 12:28:52 PM PST by Kaslin (Don't fear the terrorists. They're mothers and fathers. Rosie O'Donnell November 9, 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Post5203

The real failure in this entire matter was the lack of investigation into the 2 Florida Democrat operatives that took the fall for this listening to phone calls. I don't believe for a minute that they just happened to hear Gingrich. Gingrich was tapped by professionals. I believed it then and I still believe it.


22 posted on 12/12/2006 12:30:09 PM PST by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Fined $300,000? No way Jose. Where is that written?


23 posted on 12/12/2006 12:31:10 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Majority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio)

Boehner sued McDermott over the issue. It seems to me he got a favorable ruling in court ...
anyone out there with an update?

24 posted on 12/12/2006 12:35:27 PM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
The Truth of the matter regarding alleged Gingrich fine is below. What has been quoted in this article is not only wrong but it is the RAT spin:

Jan. 11, 2006 | Dear Editor: (Slate)

In Michael Scherer's piece ("Newt: I'm Shocked, Shocked by Abramoff Scandal!"), he falsely asserts that former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich was required to "pay a $300,000 penalty" for "misusing nonprofit organizations for political purposes, personally benefiting from political contributions and giving false statements to ethics investigators."

Mr. Scherer should have checked the facts first. Democrats filed 84 politically motivated ethics charges against Speaker Gingrich. All of them were found to be without merit. The last three were dismissed on Oct. 10, 1998. The fact is, not a single ethics charge filed against Speaker Gingrich was ever found to be based in fact -- not one.

During the investigation into the bogus charge of "misusing nonprofit organizations for political purposes," a letter responding to an inquiry by the Ethics Committee prepared and filed by a Gingrich lawyer did contain an inaccuracy. When Gingrich learned about the discrepancy, he personally accepted responsibility for the misstatement, corrected the record, and agreed to reimburse the Ethics Committee for the cost of that investigation.

The voluntary reimbursement did not stem from the phony charge, but was paid because of the error made by counsel during the investigation -- an investigation that concluded no wrongdoing by the speaker whatsoever and was dismissed by the bipartisan Ethics Committee as were all 84 of the other charges. It was specifically not a penalty according to the Ethics Committee agreement.

The fallout in the case resulted in an IRS investigation and a federal court case. Ultimately, Speaker Gingrich was cleared of any wrongdoing by the bipartisan Ethics Committee, the IRS and a federal judge.

So it is simply wrong to mislead readers by suggesting that Speaker Gingrich paid a fine, misused nonprofit organizations or personally benefited in any way from political contributions. The facts show that he took responsibility for an error during the investigation and reimbursed the committee from his personal funds making him extraordinarily well-qualified to be an outspoken critic on the current and very real ethics scandal.

Best regards,

Rick Tyler Communications Director and Spokesperson Gingrich Communications

25 posted on 12/12/2006 12:42:15 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Al Gator

you may be on to something here....


also.. don't forget that their media machine doesn't report on demonrats wrong doings...


26 posted on 12/12/2006 12:45:17 PM PST by fhlh (Liberal (noun): A person so open minded, their brains have fallen out of their head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative
A decade ago? These guys are right on top of things. Very inspriring.

They were going to get to it right after they finished viewing the evidence for the new porn warning label bill.

-PJ

27 posted on 12/12/2006 12:47:45 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

McDermott has distinguished himself by acting like a snake in the grass - no offense intended to snakes.


28 posted on 12/12/2006 12:49:25 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Funny.

this happened, what TEN YEARS AGO! - and just now, right after the repubbies GIVE Congress to the democrats in the most lame-handed foolishly run campaign EVR (Bob Dole's included!0 they are just now releasing their report.

Yeah.

these guys really did know how the rule, didn't they.
29 posted on 12/12/2006 12:51:23 PM PST by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
He said he might change his long-standing support for an internal ethics panel and consider replacing it with an independent inspector general to investigate House members

whatta concept :/
30 posted on 12/12/2006 12:51:39 PM PST by fhlh (Liberal (noun): A person so open minded, their brains have fallen out of their head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Impressive.

three old fat guys - none wearing ties or suits or formally sitting up straight - with a row of murderous but purposely and seriously led murderers.

Now, are those murderers going to take ANY US statement seriously - when "looks" and impressions count in their minds?
31 posted on 12/12/2006 12:53:51 PM PST by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ethics is the province of honest men and seldom visited upon the likes of Congress.


32 posted on 12/12/2006 12:55:40 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

33 posted on 12/12/2006 1:12:59 PM PST by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It took 10 years for the Ethics Committee to say Jimbo screwed up with no further action recommended. What a farce!


34 posted on 12/12/2006 1:26:10 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Fire the guy!


35 posted on 12/12/2006 1:46:17 PM PST by Sword_Svalbardt (Sword Svalbardt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al Gator

Too many like Frist have made their careers on the success of their parents. Even though they sometimes may be bright, as Frist is,academically they frequently attend the same Universities as the wealthy liberal elite of the country. With this social and academic background they often feel entitled to success and believe that their ideas have greater weight than those of their constituents. These ideas frequently lean in the same direction as their liberal alumni colleagues. They may have a conservative economic outlook but will frequently lean to the social liberal side when it comes time to show some guts and fight. In other words they feel superior to the great unwashed electorate.

This is basically my definition of a RINO.

This is also why I think we need to implement conservative affirmative action by requiring that all members of congress hire only graduates of the Universities in their state. Possibly with a requirement that they be within, say, 5 years of graduation. This way the "permanent group" of people who run Congressional offices will develop some diversity and remember where they came from. This should also be required of all committee staffs.


36 posted on 12/12/2006 1:50:13 PM PST by A Strict Constructionist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Speaker Gingrich, R-Ga., in a December 1996 conference call with GOP leaders

Up until eight months later when she died, the Clinton Administration was also tapping Princess Diana's cellphone......


37 posted on 12/12/2006 2:00:56 PM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Maynerd; Bobsvainbabblings; moneypenny; Kaylee Frye; Clintonfatigued; wallcrawlr; Lucky2; ..

WA State ping...JFK


38 posted on 12/12/2006 2:18:09 PM PST by BADROTOFINGER (Life sucks. Get a helmet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

this is outrageous.....it is unethical.....

what is piglosi gonna do about it????

according to piglosi....this will be the most honest & ethical congress in history!!!!


39 posted on 12/12/2006 2:22:38 PM PST by hnj_00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Foley case is closed in five minutes yet it takes ten years to investigate a Democrat.


40 posted on 12/12/2006 3:41:18 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Democracy: The worst form of government, except for all the others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Does this mean Pelosi and Rahm Emanuel are obligated to resign???


41 posted on 12/12/2006 4:00:50 PM PST by cookcounty (The "Greatest Generation" was also the most violent generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative
"Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., violated ethics standards by giving reporters access to an illegally taped telephone call involving Republican leaders a decade ago, the House ethics committee said Monday."

He also committed a felony, but if we started prosecuting every felon, we'd have to move the Congress to Fort Leavenworth.

42 posted on 12/12/2006 4:03:55 PM PST by cookcounty (The "Greatest Generation" was also the most violent generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The most ethical congress ever- Perhaps these criminals are a step up in ethics and it really is 'the most ethical' congress ever- perhaps they weeded out the 'really bad guys' and went with the really disgusting criminals' instead. http://sacredscoop.com?


43 posted on 12/12/2006 4:36:22 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
A decade ago? These guys are right on top of things. Very inspriring.

They were going to get to it right after they finished viewing the evidence for the new porn warning label bill.

Will Arlen Spector get to investigate the NFL rules for televising games befire that? Steroids in Baseball should not languish either.

One cannot help but be disappointed sometimes in the priorities.

44 posted on 12/13/2006 3:51:35 AM PST by IamConservative (Any man who agrees with you on everything, also lies to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Gee, what could possibly reflect badly against a bunch of dirty sleazy morons who extort money from the public. What a surprise. By the way, Baghdad Jim is a traitor and should have been tried, convicted and shot.


45 posted on 12/13/2006 3:55:19 AM PST by Doc Savage ("You couldn't tame me, but you taught me.................")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson