Skip to comments.Rick Warren critics over OBAMA told to leave the church...
Posted on 12/14/2006 11:48:10 AM PST by jodiluvshoes
click here to read article
Upset the agenda and you get bit.
The Delphi Technique was developed by the Rand Corporation for use by the Department of Defense as a psychological tool to control people. Dissenters are singled out, and dismissed or ridiculed to diminish their credibility. It is simply a psychological technique to "divide and conquer" and is used by churches, businesses, etc.
Yeah, I had a bible study teacher who reacted the same way. Question HER interpretation and you were smacked down as not knowing what you were talking about.
I find a lot of Evangelicals are this way.
The minister at my sister's church was eventually asked to leave after having an affair with church secretary. He got a transfer to Washington State, but the church followed up with a report to the new church and he was asked to leave there, as well.
The new minister isn't any better and is trying to turn the church into one of those new mega churches. So, she left. It's the Church of the Nazarene and they don't even mention the name of Jesus in the sermons, for fear of offending some of the new people.
Ear-tickling is what I call it.
I find a lot of Catholics are this way.
Tommy, you need to provide a link when you speak about these things, and this is something that we need to discuss on FR...only problem is that the majour religious people who DO talk about it aren't welcome on FR for some reason (now i wonder what that reason might be).
For the rest of you. The Delphi Technique was a tool developed by the Rand Corporation to determine important topics in the Factual domain. Social Scientists have began to use the technique in the affective domain in order to get the majourity of people to accept a Pre-determined outcome. It is an evil tool of manipulation when used in such a manner. This particular site describes how Warren et. al. use the technique to manipulate the congregation.
There is another term that has come into use recently for the same technique, it's founder, Dean Gotcher calls the method Diaprax.
While Diaprax/Delphi is usually found manifested in secular applications, it has fast spread to the churches as a tool of manipulation.
In our household the Bible, the Koran, and the Bhagavad Gita sat on the shelf alongside books of Greek and Norse and African mythology. On Easter or Christmas Day my mother might drag me to church, just as she dragged me to the Buddhist temple, the Chinese New Year celebration, the Shinto shrine, and ancient Hawaiian burial sites. But I was made to understand that such religious samplings required no sustained commitment on my part--no introspective exertion or self-flagellation. Religion was an expression of human culture, she would explain, not its wellspring, just one of the many ways--and not necessarily the best way--that man attempted to control the unknowable and understand the deeper truths about our lives.
Obama is a dyed-in-the-wool abortion supporter, including the atrocious partial-birth variety.
So what he speaks platitudes about fighting AIDS. What's the difference if he's willing to kill millions in the womb?
And Warren is surprised by the reaction of his congregants?
My impression exactly. When this is all over and his fifteen minutes of fame expires, Rick Warren might be well advised to look into Christianity instead of whatever it is that he is doing now.
There were two points in the text at the link:
"For Delphi to work, it is critical that the targeted group be kept away from knowledgeable people who could lead them away from the Delphier's pre-determined outcome."
"It requires well-trained professionals, known as "facilitators" or "change agents," who deliberately escalate tension among group members, pitting one faction against another to make a preordained viewpoint appear "sensible," while making opposing views appear ridiculous."
It sounds to me like US journalism schools have been educating our journalists on how to be good practictioners of The Delphi Technique.
In So. Baptist churches, when a person that is a member of one church wishes to "move" their membership, the new church is notified if there has been problems with the former member. This is not a new practice.
Or denominational church and cult.
Should be able to hear the sound of them drums right about now.
At the risk of losing everything here - AMEN, BROTHER.
Liberal Democrats have been using this technique for years.
Same with the pastor at our former church. I once plotted the references, and it turned out that he'd actually mention Jesus in some substantive way about once every six weeks. Most of the time, his sermons were about how to be better neighbors, better spouses, better parents, and the like. A whole lot of "obligation" and performance standards dumped on us, without the key to actually performing -- the indwelling Spirit of Christ.
Not very difficult to fathom.
We had the same experience as My2cents and it wasn't a Baptist church but a Lutheran one. Egos are not denominational distinct.
It is abused, as you say, by folks who wish to drive a meeting to a predetermined conclusion.
Sin is pretty universal.
Fascinating. I was a So.Baptist church secretary at one time. Never even heard of this. But then again, I don't remember having any "problems" move. That could be why.
Yes it is.
I'm reading a book which mentione that in street markets in Africa, condoms are used to bag purchases.
I certainly don't attend church nearly as often as I should, but I DO believe in the power of prayer! I've seen it work SO MANY times!
That pastor was an idiot! I hear so many stories like the ones here. Sad.
It's one reason I no longer apply the "evangelical" label to myself. It used to be that "evangelical" meant belief in the authority and reliability of the Bible, mission and evangelistic outreach, a focus on Christ.
No it doesn't. It is the church's responsibility to inform the church requesting the person's letter if there has been a serious problem.
Not a fan of Rick Warren, do not agree with his tactics.
Whereas on the flip side most churches don't tell search committees about Ego pastor because they want him gone so bad. Lived through that a couple of times as a kid also.
It is sad, but it encourages me to read threads like this and find individual believers who are strong in their faith, beliefs, and practice, in spite of the abysmal condition of some of their churches.
You are probably correct. I have only seen it in the abusive format as a control on a group. I first witnessed it at Hewlett Packard as a management tool, then at another company owned and operated by Scientologists. It was an eerie similarity, and then I did some research and put the two together. It goes by various names, but the methods are the same. Many times there are disastrous results, such as a high turnover in management, sales staffs, church congretations, etc. who won't put up with such control tactics. Unfortunately, it is most often the weaker people in the church congregation that are found to be under such control.
You faith cannot be in the church/people. Although you should keep worshipping in a body of believers you can't base your faith on them.
LOL, but true.
The whole country knows about our pastor. If it was up to me he would be gone, but it is not!
Absolutely. People will disappoint every time. And yet in every mega-church I'm familiar with, the church is built not so much on Christ, but on the personality and charisma of the pastor.
I found this true of the Conservative Baptist Association. The regional rep's main job was to push lemons -- pastors who had gone bust -- onto unsuspecting churches. I've always felt that, where possible, churches should promote from within. We had a college pastor at our former church -- great guy -- who candidated for the senior pastor position when a vacancy arose. But he was turned down by a majority of the congregation, because they viewed him as "the college pastor." So, rather than get a senior pastor that everyone knew, someone who had proven his faithfulness and effectivness in ministry as an associate, the church ended up with the works-oriented, prayer-hating clunker I've been referring to in this thread.
"And leave they should, the type of apostate gospel that is promoted in that church is dangerous and a sign of the times."
Yes - he's doing them a favor. They'll know it one day.
Oh I'm so shocked. Whouda thought?
Seriously that man has been letting his true self shine through lately. Even the willingly blind should be able to see it by now.
"Resisters" got directions to the door long before this.
What an amazing turn of events in the last few weeks, huh?
We are in the Laodecean stage of the church: luke warm and thinking it's rich but is a spiritual pauper.
Saddleback Church? Sounds more like Bare Back Church.
"FR kicked them out because they were obnoxious, bigoted idiots.
Not very difficult to fathom."
I think I like the Delphi method better than yours.
The members will be better off for it. Then maybe they can get into a church. Study the Word of God & hear the gospel of Jesus Christ actually preached.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.