Posted on 12/17/2006 10:28:14 PM PST by goldstategop
Perhaps I am splitting hairs or straining at gnats here but it seems to me that the "deprivation or subjection" cannot occur without pursuing the full legal process through to conviction when said deprivation would be imposed. Don't get me wrong -- I believe Nifong has acted without facts and current DNA information throws so much doubt into the the case as to make it a simple motion to dismiss (with prejudice) by the defense. Doesn't this come under the old saying about "indicting a ham sandwich"???
IANAL, but can't judges initiate a proceeding against a prosecutor/D.A.?
Watch how quickly this case disappears once it is thrown out of court. Remember Nifong is a rat and has "protection" under the media blanket.
cna't wait for nifong:
1) to be arrested for prosecutoy malfeasance
2) perp walked in handcuffs
3) tried for each offense separately
4) convicted of each crime
5) sent to prison
6) become some bubba's bee-itch
then he can cry about rape!!!!!
In reality no. Figuratively they still are in jail.
I Agree , we need a Nifong Law !
Nifong belongs in prison !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.