Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Click on Source to download the report
1 posted on 12/23/2006 4:00:06 PM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Valin
Is Berger free from double-jeopardy because he plead to lesser charges based on what the Justice Department knew at the time?

If it is now clear that Berger lied to investigators about how he came to take the documents (based on admissions of hiding the documents under a construction trailer), can new charges be brought against him so that the full penalty of law can be applied to him?

Or, must he still be protected so he can continue to work in a future Rodham administration?

-PJ

64 posted on 12/24/2006 12:50:16 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin

65 posted on 12/26/2006 8:35:17 AM PST by rhema ("Break the conventions, keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin

This should be front page, leading story, not back of the blog. The treatment of this story is as much of a crime as Berger's actions.


66 posted on 12/26/2006 8:41:29 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin

Wasn't ol' Sandy a member of "the most ethical administration in history"??


67 posted on 12/26/2006 7:27:00 PM PST by TheGrimReaper (Mary Jo Kopechne was unavailable for comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin
I don't have time to read through this thread, but I wanted to make sure that all posters are aware of this part, as posted in an editorial in the San Diego Union Tribune:

Some of the documents missing since Berger's visits to the Archives were originals, notes the inspector general. E-mails Berger reviewed could not be reconstructed. But the Clinton Presidential Library in Little Rock has copies it could release.

The former president and his library have refused access, leaving this sad saga with an all too familiar end: one more top aide covering for a former president whose aides famously covered for him, and that former president keeping his legacy from the scrutiny it's due.

_____

Shouldn't Hillary have to answer for this - as to why on earth her husband and his library refuse access to secure copies of stolen documents? This part is new to me and it's making me angry that it's not a big deal in the media.

98 posted on 01/04/2007 7:57:26 AM PST by Sonora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Valin
I don't have time to read through this thread, but I wanted to make sure that all posters are aware of this part, as posted in an editorial in the San Diego Union Tribune:

Some of the documents missing since Berger's visits to the Archives were originals, notes the inspector general. E-mails Berger reviewed could not be reconstructed. But the Clinton Presidential Library in Little Rock has copies it could release.

The former president and his library have refused access, leaving this sad saga with an all too familiar end: one more top aide covering for a former president whose aides famously covered for him, and that former president keeping his legacy from the scrutiny it's due.

_____

Shouldn't Hillary have to answer for this - as to why on earth her husband and his library refuse access to secure copies of stolen documents? This part is new to me and it's making me angry that it's not a big deal in the media.

101 posted on 01/04/2007 8:10:19 AM PST by Sonora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson