Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Owners cut jobs as wages increase
Colorado Springs Gazette ^ | December 31, 2006 | Sarah Colwell

Posted on 12/31/2006 2:32:37 PM PST by Graybeard58

Some Colorado Springs restaurant owners worry that they will have to raise prices, lay off workers or shut their doors after new minimum wage rules go into effect Monday.

The minimum wage in Colorado increases $1.70 an hour for tipped and nontipped workers Monday. That represents a 33 percent increase for nontipped workers, to $6.85 an hour, and an 80 percent increase, to $3.83 an hour, for tipped workers. Colorado voters approved a constitutional amendment mandating the increases in November.

These costs will be adjusted annually according to the Colorado Price Index, which is based on the cost of living in Denver and Boulder.

Small-business owners, especially those in the restaurant industry, are expected to have trouble covering the increase, said Fred Crowley, an economist at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs.

Proponents of the amendment say a minimum wage increase is necessary because the previous minimum wage wasn’t enough to live on.

In other states where the minimum wage has been raised, “there hasn’t been evidence of job losses or a detriment to the economy,” said Rich Jones of the Bell Policy Center, a think tank that supported the increase. “This is a modest increase that gives workers a bit more to live on, and it can be absorbed by the economy.”

After the amendment passed, the Colorado Restaurant Association was swamped with phone calls from restaurant owners asking for suggestions on how to cover the increase in labor costs, said Dave Symonds, president of the Colorado Restaurant Association Pikes Peak Chapter.

The association held a series of seminars for members on how they can cope with the wage increase without violating labor laws. For example, some restaurant owners wondered whether tipped workers could perform the duties of nontipped workers, such as kitchen prep work, to offset some labor costs. Attorneys and labor experts told association members this would not be legal, Symonds said. The association will hold more seminars in February.

Many restaurant owners will have to raise prices to make up the increased labor costs, Symonds said. Crowley, the economist, expects prices to go up by five percent to six percent because of the minimum wage increase.

“In most economic models, if your costs go up, you raise the prices you charge. Otherwise, the other option is that you forfeit your profit margin,” which is about five percent on average for restaurants nationwide, Symonds said.

Some restaurants are already changing their business operations.

Conway’s Red Top restaurant recently closed its store at 5865 Palmer Park Blvd. in large part because of the minimum wage increase, said operations manager Ralph Brown. Starting in January, all Conway locations are going to have reduced hours. To save money on rent, managers closed half of the dining area at the South Nevada Avenue store.

“We’re doing anything we can do just to make it through,” Brown said. “In the next three to six months, if things aren’t going right, we might have to close another store.”

Red Top managers estimate the increase will cost them $100 a day per store, which amounts to $180,000 a year increase to payroll costs, Brown said.

“We have to increase prices every year just to stay up with the cost of food, and now we will have to increase prices even more because of the increase in labor costs,” Brown said. “We are trying to put a menu mix together that’s not going to have people running out the door, but we’re going to have to increase menu prices.”

Symonds, owner of the Craftwood Inn and Stagecoach Inn restaurants in Manitou Springs, said he has eliminated four hostess and busboy positions, from a staff of 50.

Andy Michopoulos, coowner of Michelle Chocolatiers & Ice Cream, said his wait staff earns good wages under the old pay scale of $2.13 an hour for workers earning tips.

“If a waitress is not earning between $10 to $20 a hour after tips, then they are not doing their job,” Michopoulos said. Some organizations in the business community are looking into getting the constitutional amendment repealed. The Greater Colorado Springs Chamber of Commerce wants to see a change to the inflationadjustment clause of the amendment, said Stephannie Finley, president of governmental affairs and public policy with the chamber.

The Colorado Restaurant Association “will thoroughly investigate every opportunity to repeal, amend, overturn or challenge the law,” according an association document.

Repealing the amendment will be difficult, Finley said. Since it is a part of the state constitution, voters would have to amend or repeal it at the next general election in November 2008.

CONTACT THE WRITER: 476-4893 or sarah.colwell@gazette.com

AMENDMENT 42

The amendment increases from $5.15 to $6.85 per hour the state minimum wage for salaried workers and increases from $2.13 to $3.83 per hour the state minimum wage for workers receiving tips. Employers must make up the difference for tipped workers whose tips, along with $3.83 per hour, don’t add up to what would be $6.85 an hour, averaged over a two-week period. These increases are effective January 1, 2007. Thereafter, the minimum wage is increased annually based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) used in Colorado.

HOW THE MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE WILL AFFECT A BUSINESS WITH 10 EMPLOYEES

Hours worked annually for 10 full-time employees:

20,800

Minimum wage increase:

$1.70

Hours times wage increase:

$35,360

SOURCE: Colorado Restaurant Association

HOW MUCH MINIMUM WAGE WILL BE ASSUMING 3 PERCENT INFLATION

In five years:

$7.70 nontipped, $4.31 tipped

In 10 years:

$8.93 nontipped, $5 tipped

In 15 years:

$10.35 nontipped, $5.79 tipped

In 20 years:

$11.99 nontipped, $6.71 tipped

SOURCE: Gazette research


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: freedomofcontract; govwatch; minimumwage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-91 next last

1 posted on 12/31/2006 2:32:39 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Now the voters who wanted this will be pissed at the restaurant because they will have to wait longer for their meal....let Capitalism work, leave wages alone to the market place.

Meadow Muffin
2 posted on 12/31/2006 2:34:34 PM PST by rwgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
This is a modest increase that gives workers a bit more to live on, and it can be absorbed by the economy.

Wrong. It must be absorbed by the EMPLOYER.

3 posted on 12/31/2006 2:35:40 PM PST by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Well, duh.


4 posted on 12/31/2006 2:38:48 PM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Colorado just became anti-business.
5 posted on 12/31/2006 2:39:12 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Bush Derangement Syndrome Has Reached Pandemic Levels on Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I'm pretty sure the real minimum wage is zero dollars per hour ($0.00/hr).


6 posted on 12/31/2006 2:40:32 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
the previous minimum wage wasn’t enough to live on

I've never seen waitresses dying on the job. Most of them seem pretty healthy and even happy. Must be the tips.

7 posted on 12/31/2006 2:42:38 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

As I've said before, give em a raise and then increase a tax or two somewhere. When will the morons ever learn they're being gamed by the socialists in government ???


8 posted on 12/31/2006 2:43:14 PM PST by Obie Wan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwgal; Graybeard58
Now the voters who wanted this will be pissed at the restaurant because they will have to wait longer for their meal....

And that it costs more.........

9 posted on 12/31/2006 2:45:21 PM PST by Gabz (If we weren't crazy, we'd just all go insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Rich Jones worked for 24 years at the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), where he was director of the Legislative Programs Division. In that role, he wrote extensively about topics such as management, legislative operations, term limits, staffing and oversight. He has also worked on a variety of policy issues including economic development, financial services and telecommunications. Before joining NCSL he worked as a researcher for the Pennsylvania General Assembly. Rich holds a bachelor of arts in government administration from Shippensburg University in Pennsylvania and a masters in public administration from Penn State.

10 posted on 12/31/2006 2:45:30 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Coloradans are a stupid lot who assume small business owners have bushels of money stashed away somewhere. The latter don't and the result is fewer people will have jobs and folks will pay more for dining out. Congratulations, Colorado!

As a newly minted Coloradan here in Colorado Springs, nothing gets quite up my dander like people's ignorance of economics.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

11 posted on 12/31/2006 2:45:38 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwgal
The gall of someone thinking they have the right to dictate what someone else must pay their employees.

Why the heck now just raise it to $20.00 per hour, of we're going after a living wage.

12 posted on 12/31/2006 2:46:12 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

the idiots who voted for this will get what they deserve - a messed up economy.


13 posted on 12/31/2006 2:46:35 PM PST by flashbunny (If the founding fathers were alive today, they'd be buying feathers and boiling tar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevem
I'm pretty sure the real minimum wage is zero dollars per hour ($0.00/hr).

For a few people, it certainly became so:

Symonds, owner of the Craftwood Inn and Stagecoach Inn restaurants in Manitou Springs, said he has eliminated four hostess and busboy positions, from a staff of 50.
But just look at how much more they'd be making - if only they still had a job.
14 posted on 12/31/2006 2:49:12 PM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault; Graybeard58
the previous minimum wage wasn’t enough to live on

Right, genius. Pay everyone - no matter what they do - enough to live on for any task. Then what do you have? Is there any reason for a teen to look beyond McDonald's when he can live on whatever he earns there? This idea of a "living wage" is not only idiotic and Marxist, it's dangerous.
15 posted on 12/31/2006 2:49:53 PM PST by Jaysun (I've never paid for sex in my life. And that's really pissed off a lot of prostitutes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction
Wrong. It must be absorbed by the EMPLOYER.

Wrong, it is absorbed by the consumer. If the consumer doesn't pay the price, the restaurant closes and the employees wages go down to zero.

16 posted on 12/31/2006 2:51:46 PM PST by sharkhawk (Play me a dirge matey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
HOW THE MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE WILL AFFECT A BUSINESS WITH 10 EMPLOYEES

Hours worked annually for 10 full-time employees:

20,800

Minimum wage increase:

$1.70

Hours times wage increase:

$35,360

Plus another $2,700 FICA and Medicare tax that the employer must pay to the Feds. And I believe that the Unemployment Tax and Workman's Compensation Insurance is based on payroll so there will be an increase in costs for these as well.

17 posted on 12/31/2006 2:53:27 PM PST by So Cal Rocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Anyone who can't move out of a minimum wage position into a higher paying position after gaining experience and increasing their skills shouldn't complain about the wages they are earning. The minimum wage was never meant to be a "living wage" but an entry level wage on the way to moving into a higher paying position for those who work hard.

Increasing the minimum wage through a forced artificial means such as this can only cause problems with our economy as this article points out. Either we will all be paying higher costs, or employers will have to lay off people, or both (more likely both). Get set for another round of higher unemployment rates, which will increase the crime rate, as the morons who keep passing these increases scratch their heads as to why this continues to not work.

18 posted on 12/31/2006 2:56:38 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier fighting the terrorists in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

For tipped employees this is ridiculous. The make far above the minimum wage as it is, more than half of that going untaxed.


19 posted on 12/31/2006 2:57:52 PM PST by Raebie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Everything will be fine. Colorado will just place an order for about 1,000,000 more illegals.


20 posted on 12/31/2006 2:58:10 PM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharkhawk
In the restaurant business, there's also the cost of food. That's something a restaurant owner can't do much about but they can control labor costs. To keep prices in line, they'll have to lay off workers or close restaurant locations. People think they can have something with very little pain. In the real world though, someone has to pay the tab. Its usually the restaurant patron who ends up taking it on the chin.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

21 posted on 12/31/2006 2:59:08 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

More owners will just take employees off the books.


22 posted on 12/31/2006 3:00:36 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction
Wrong. It must be absorbed by the EMPLOYER.

No, it'll be passed on to the consumer.

23 posted on 12/31/2006 3:01:43 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Customers could save a lot by not leaving tips.


24 posted on 12/31/2006 3:05:15 PM PST by FoxInSocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

The morons who voted for these increases will not even realize that is the reason they lost their job or half to pay higher costs or both. Plus they will probably blame the national chains for their misfortune.


25 posted on 12/31/2006 3:09:56 PM PST by Stayingawayfromthedarkside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks
"Customers could save a lot by not leaving tips."

Perfect way to protest this stupid liberal law. Don't tip the waitress, just tell them you would have if they didn't just get that big raise...lol
26 posted on 12/31/2006 3:11:21 PM PST by Beagle8U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks
Customers could save a lot by not leaving tips.

Could you imagine if enough people wrote on their check: "Congratulations on your $1.70/hr raise! I'm adjusting the tip accordingly."

27 posted on 12/31/2006 3:11:31 PM PST by whd23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
I discussed this with my son, who is a college student that also works about 25 hours a week as a server at Outback.

According to him, there's no need to lay anyone off. Turnover is restaurants is such that attrition will solve the problem in a month, 60 days tops.
28 posted on 12/31/2006 3:14:20 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Leftist policies hurt those they claim to help. Then when the leftist policies fail, leftists always demand more of the same failed policies.


29 posted on 12/31/2006 3:16:57 PM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (the left is loony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Don't forget that every vendor the restaurant owner deals with is affected by the new wage so all his supplies, food and utilities will also increase. The owner can cut some costs perhaps but where is it written that he can't raise his menu prices....
30 posted on 12/31/2006 3:17:09 PM PST by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Stayingawayfromthedarkside
Evil business owners and corporations /sarc off.

I guess the public has forgotten about NAFTA and the other bill whose name I can't recall that resulted in jobs going overseas and lowering wages in the U.S as a result. Let's just blame the small business owner and make them all pay (sarc/).

31 posted on 12/31/2006 3:17:16 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier fighting the terrorists in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BW2221
According to him, there's no need to lay anyone off. Turnover is restaurants is such that attrition will solve the problem in a month, 60 days tops.

I don't see how, the new hires will still have to be paid at the higher rate.

32 posted on 12/31/2006 3:17:22 PM PST by Gabz (If we weren't crazy, we'd just all go insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
The Utah Tourism Board should release some ads.

If your Colorado vacation is too expensive, come to Utah!

33 posted on 12/31/2006 3:17:43 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58; Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
34 posted on 12/31/2006 3:24:02 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/optimism_nov8th.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Owners cut jobs as wages increase

Gee, who'da thunk it? /UltraMegaGigaSarc

35 posted on 12/31/2006 3:25:01 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Saddam is Dead! Bush's Fault. [Pray for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Proponents of the amendment say a minimum wage increase is necessary because the previous minimum wage wasn’t enough to live on.

Since it's all arbitrary, why don't these mindless twits make it $10,000 per hour. I'd much rather make $10,000 per hour than $6.85 per hour. Who knows? Maybe if you are smart enough to think of arbitrary "minimum wages" you aren't smart enough to realize that $10,000 is better than $6.85.

36 posted on 12/31/2006 3:25:33 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
>>>According to him, there's no need to lay anyone off. Turnover is restaurants is such that attrition will solve the problem in a month, 60 days tops.

>>>I don't see how, the new hires will still have to be paid at the higher rate.

don't rehire for those that quit...you don't have to pay people you don't hire.

37 posted on 12/31/2006 3:27:52 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (Liberals: First to demand tolerance, last to practice it when conservatives disagree with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

DUH (she says as she slaps upsideherhead........)

I can't believe I didn't catch that - thanks.


38 posted on 12/31/2006 3:37:29 PM PST by Gabz (If we weren't crazy, we'd just all go insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction

"Wrong. It must be absorbed by the EMPLOYER."

Wrong. He raises prices. It's absorbed by the customer.


39 posted on 12/31/2006 3:38:53 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
No, he means cutting through attrition. Don't lay anyone off; just don't replace the first two servers and bussers who quit.
40 posted on 12/31/2006 3:39:54 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BW2221

I see that now, why I didn't at first is beyond me.

It makes perfect sense.


41 posted on 12/31/2006 3:49:49 PM PST by Gabz (If we weren't crazy, we'd just all go insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
If I were a Colorado restaurant owner, on each bill, I'd add a line item called "State Minimum Wage Assessment" with enough to cover the increases in costs, just like they do with "gratuity for parties over 8". When the consumers begin to get the message that they are the ones paying for the largess of the politicians, they'll get a short course in Economics 101.

Unfortunately, many tax laws outlaw such a notification--the government can't stand people knowing how much they're being fleeced by their "compassionate" government. The same may apply here.

42 posted on 12/31/2006 3:55:01 PM PST by Small-L ("Government is not the answer to our problems -- government is the problem." --RWR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Employers must make up the difference for tipped workers whose tips, along with $3.83 per hour, don’t add up to what would be $6.85 an hour, averaged over a two-week period.

So if workers make above a certain amount in tips, there is no minimum wage increase? It sounds like a government pan to subsiz=dize the workers who can't bring in tips. I.E. - subsidize the lowest performing employees.

43 posted on 12/31/2006 3:57:33 PM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
No, it'll be passed on to the consumer.

Employers of low profit margin businesses are always able to pass cost increases on to the consumer. In these cases, the business closes and the everyone loses their job.

44 posted on 12/31/2006 3:58:29 PM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Raebie
For tipped employees this is ridiculous. The make far above the minimum wage as it is, more than half of that going untaxed.

Actually it's insane. All this did is take away the jobs of tipped employees that were making $10 to $20 an hour. I would imagine that tipped employees would love to just waive their hourly income in lieu of their tipped income.

All this job did is close a lot of business, eliminate a lot of jobs and raise the cost of living in Colorado enough that it would undo any benefit of the minimum wage increase.

I really have to wonder who had the bright idea to increase the minimum wage of tipped employees.

45 posted on 12/31/2006 4:02:49 PM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
No big deal. Nothing to See Here. Colorado restaurants join thousands of other former U.S. employers. China is eating our lunch. Educate yourself. Time to move on.
46 posted on 12/31/2006 4:17:54 PM PST by ex-Texan (Matthew 7: 1 - 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction
"This is a modest increase that gives workers a bit more to live on, and it can be absorbed by the economy."

-- --

If the economy can simply absorb it, then why not make minimum wage $50 bucks an hour? And I don't want to see the price of stuff I buy going up either.

The clowns who did the math did it wrong. Every one of the calculations was off by one year.

The other thing is that the iterative method of adjustment will guarantee runaway inflation, as each successive year's natural inflation rate (which is due solely to natural economic growth) will be piled onto the last artificial increase.

So the actual minimum wage in five years will likely be (1.03 X 1.0609 X 1.10107 X 1.1341021 X 1.168125 X 6.85/hr. = $10.92/hr. (not $7.70 as they think)

But their assumption of a modest 3% inflation during 2007 while supporting a hefty 33% increase in wages is completely idiotic. The person already earning $7.00/hr is going to DEMAND a 33% raise also, why should she be making only $0.15 more per hour than the chucklhead who was just hired? Then the unions will demand a 33% increase. It will not stop until it's been run all the way up the economic wage ladder.

47 posted on 12/31/2006 4:26:09 PM PST by HighWheeler (A true liberal today is a combination of socialist, fascist, hypocrite, and anti-American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Heck, in California even they won't work for less than $10 an hour these days and in some places want $15.


48 posted on 12/31/2006 4:30:37 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

I talked to a server here in Calif. at Hometown Buffet and she said she made $7.50 an hour plus tips. My kids worked in Texas for $2.13 an hour plus sometimes no tips. Now THAT low of a wage (at Ryan's Steak House Buffet) is legalized slavery. They worked their butts off for almost no pay. You don't get a lot of tips working at buffet places, although you work your butt off, bringing clean plates MANY TIMES, drinks, rolls, napkins, taking away dirty plates. Also going into the kitchen working for hours folding napkins, doing tons of dirty dishes, for $2.13 an hour. BTW Ryans got sued for this.


49 posted on 12/31/2006 4:36:14 PM PST by buffyt (~Merry Christmas ~ Happy New Year~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Please, Please, Please, start teaching capitalism in schools.

Lest just say, hypothetically, that you hate Exxon. You force the unions to raise their wages to $50 an hour and raise their taxes to %80 of profits. Exxon has a board meeting. Fires all personnel they can sub out and raise the price of the product to the consumer to to reflect all tax and cost raises. Gas is now $5 a gallon.

CORPORATIONS PAY NO TAXES, YOU DO!

Lower costs to corporations and there will be more jobs for the middle class, lower costs to the consumer, and even more exports because we can compete with more markets.

Somehow this is just too tough for students and teachers to comprehend.( and the average voter for some reason)

50 posted on 12/31/2006 4:38:20 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson