Skip to comments.
Cheney faces troubled new year
FinancialTimes ^
| 12-29-06
Posted on 01/01/2007 1:21:01 AM PST by STARWISE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Pounds of flesh and hate, in preparation for extraction. The more I remember Cheney's extraordinarily elevated and loving euology of Pres. Ford, the more I think he was beginning to set the stage for the American people for the obvious sharp contrast between the real Rats in politics and the Pubbies we're about to witness.
"And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm."
1
posted on
01/01/2007 1:21:05 AM PST
by
STARWISE
To: Mo1; Peach; Txsleuth; onyx; Howlin; Lancey Howard; Enchante; ohioWfan; snugs; Wolfstar; NordP; ...
2
posted on
01/01/2007 1:22:24 AM PST
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
To: STARWISE
He also vowed to look into no-bid Iraq contracts, including those awarded to Halliburton, a company the vice-president once ran. He said: At the risk of incurring another of Vice-President Cheneys special seasons greetings, I ask: Where did all the money go?
What garbage. Hasn't Halliburton been used often throughout history, and didn't they receive no-bid contracts from Pres. Clinton?
I interviewed with a firm similar to Halliburton a while ago, and during the interview they informed me they're active all over the world but didn't even bid on Iraq or Afghanistan.
The question I pose to liberals with their govt-run programs: Where does all THAT money go?
3
posted on
01/01/2007 1:28:52 AM PST
by
proud_yank
(Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
To: proud_yank
The question I pose to liberals with their govt-run programs: Where does all THAT money go?
To buy the votes of the dead, illegals, and the slums (some redundancy there).
4
posted on
01/01/2007 1:30:44 AM PST
by
peyton randolph
(No man knows the day nor the hour of The Coming of The Great White Handkerchief.)
To: STARWISE
There is more information in your comment than there is in the article.
I have never heard or read anything from the VP's office, nor on radio or TV, that did not coincide with the Oval Office.
yitbos
5
posted on
01/01/2007 1:33:27 AM PST
by
bruinbirdman
("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
To: STARWISE
I beg to differ,
Mrs. Clinton had more power as v.p. then does Cheney.
6
posted on
01/01/2007 1:37:56 AM PST
by
Joe Boucher
(an enemy of islam)
To: STARWISE
This is 99 percent wishful thinking from some anonymous editorial drone at the Financial Times who is obviously as ignorant as a mushroom in the bottom of the local grocery store produce bin.
Vice President Dick Cheney has more cajones than every 'Rat in the Senate, and the RINOs too.
7
posted on
01/01/2007 1:44:17 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: peyton randolph
I was thinking more along the lines of their private jets, beach fronts, and off-shore accounts ;-)
8
posted on
01/01/2007 1:54:52 AM PST
by
proud_yank
(Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
To: proud_yank
I was thinking more along the lines of their private jets, beach fronts, and off-shore accounts
That too. :-)
9
posted on
01/01/2007 2:04:43 AM PST
by
peyton randolph
(No man knows the day nor the hour of The Coming of The Great White Handkerchief.)
To: STARWISE
an ignominious precedent when Mr Cheney becomes the first vice-president to testify in a trial.That's like saying telling the police about a crime one witnessed makes one "ignominious". Cheney isn't accused of any wrongdoing here--I guess these writers think participating in the legal process makes one ignominious.
10
posted on
01/01/2007 3:03:31 AM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Immigration is to Illegal Immigration what Birth is to Abortion.)
To: STARWISE
"big" dick cheney is quivering at the thought of being asked the tough questions by lurch and plugs biden, thanks for the morning laugh.
To: STARWISE
when Mr Cheney becomes the first vice-president to testify in a trial. Yeah right, How about when Clinton first testified when he lied under oath???
To: JohnLongIsland
"big" dick cheney is quivering at the thought of being asked the tough questions by lurch and plugs biden, thanks for the morning laugh.LOL! I have to belive the rats are more worried about questions they can't ask rather than questions they can. Cheney will verbally eviscerate anyone who arrives less than completely prepared to deal with the truth.
13
posted on
01/01/2007 3:28:48 AM PST
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: STARWISE
Cheney's not being out in front and articulating the WOT has hurt Republicans enormously
14
posted on
01/01/2007 3:36:24 AM PST
by
tkathy
(Sectarian violence? Or genocidal racists? Which is a better description of islamists?)
To: proud_yank
The question I pose to liberals with their govt-run programs: Where does all THAT money go?
It used to go to areas like New Orleans, with their section nine housing, slum lords and Democrat voters -- now that has washed away, I think the liberals just want it for themselves.
Why yes, Haliburton did receive no bid contracts, but it was legal under Clinton to issue no bid contracts.
15
posted on
01/01/2007 4:04:56 AM PST
by
Tarpon
To: Joe Boucher
I beg to differ, Mrs. Clinton had more power as v.p. then does Cheney.Define power.
And, how 'bout you provide a few examples, hmm?
16
posted on
01/01/2007 5:35:19 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: STARWISE
Even so, there are signs that the presidents confidence in his judgment has waned. He was cut out of the decision to oust his ally Donald Rumsfeld as secretary of defence, a move he vigorously opposed. They really are genuinely close friends but the president doesnt always take his advice, said Mr Bolten. This comment is ridiculous I am sure he was advised and I am sure he spoke to Don Rumsfeld as well who actually resigned - the difference this time was the President accepted the resignation in the past when offered he refused to do so.
Also maybe the VP was not spoken to at great length on this but maybe - just maybe the President felt this was not seemly as it is well known that the VP is a close personal friend of Don Rumsfeld.
These media types really get up my nose they twist everything including something that the President may and I say may have done or not done as only these 2 men know exactly what was said privately. IMHO the President either spared the Vice President having to comment on the fact that this time the Presidentwas going to accept the resignation or he may have felt it was not correct etiquette given the closeness of Rummy and Cheney.
Good manner and etiquette mean nothing to the press.
Also taking up Josh Bolten's comments the fact that someone does not automatically take the advise of someone else on all matters does not diminish the respect or in a positive way the influence and counsel that person gives.
The most significant fact IMHO of the high esteem he is held in and valued counsel he offers is that VP Cheney is present at all high level security meetings and normally sits in all top meetings the President participates in - he just does not wish or feel it appropriate it participate in media photo op after. Probably mainly the latter so that the meeting is shown in the public persona as purely the President being there. Once again showing good manners and etiquette from his side something once again the press does not understand.
The article also says something about the Vice President not be as visible as previous VPs. Is this really true and if so in what way? Maybe other VPs have been more visible because they were preparing their run for President not visible because they were actually carrying out their duties as VP.
I speculate that in actual policy, getting the job done probably this VP is as visible and more hard working in his actual job than any previous VP has or ever will be. He was deliberately picked that he would not spend half or more of his time planning his run at the Presidency but would actuall act as counsel and assist the President in actually running the country. What a novel concept /sarcasm
17
posted on
01/01/2007 5:38:27 AM PST
by
snugs
((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
To: STARWISE
Well they can't impeach the President until they destroy Dick Cheney, so yes he's going to have a very rough year.
However, it's Dick Cheney. And they are midgets. (/ with apologies to actual midgets)
To: STARWISE
Mr Lott warns them not to over-reach: The Republicans found that when they impeached President Bill Clinton. They will find Cheney a tough hombre. Thats because Lott was a pnssy afraid to pursue the crimes and high treason that Clinton could have EASILY been found guilty of! Democraps do not have that fear and unlike Frist and Lott possess a spine loaded with spikes!
19
posted on
01/01/2007 6:22:47 AM PST
by
Bommer
(If people evolved from apes, why are there still apes?)
To: STARWISE
Cheney is great in that he fights back. It's actually too bad Cheney isn't the president.
20
posted on
01/01/2007 6:38:53 AM PST
by
bushfamfan
(DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. 2008)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson