Posted on 01/01/2007 8:04:50 AM PST by WatchingInAmazement
"So what are you doing about it?"
Not voting?......
Maybe he's beginning to think more like you do?.....
"So basically, Congress is going to raise taxes on everyone here so that Mexican citizens can enjoy the good life south of the border? That is just plain WRONG."
Yep, they are really cheap labor. To everyone; but the taxpayer. Oh my, what have our government and big business done to us? I have felt for sometime they have been gutting the middle class because that is the one of the main ways to destroy America as a free country. So this is one of the nails in the coffin. Maybe the final one.
SSA Commissioner Jo Anne Barnhart signed a "totalization" agreement in Mexico City with with Dr. Santiago Levy Algazi, Director General, Mexican Social Security Institute, that will remove from U.S. citizens working for U.S. companies in Mexico the burden of paying social security taxes to both countries. It was estimated that this would result in approximately 3,000 U.S. workers and their employers sharing in tax savings of $140 million over the first five years of the agreement due to the avoidance of double-taxation. It was estimated that the agreement would also result in approximately 50,000 U.S. and Mexican workers receiving benefits after the first five years of the agreement."
This is international negotiating at its worst. Even the SSA states the benefits are for 3,000 US citizens to 50,0000 Mexicans which doesn't even qualify as a microscopic fig leaf. It's a lopsided defeat of America.
Now we Know why Sociol Security is broke. Its not that the Baby Boomers are going to get their share,the Mexicans have already looted the place.
We have only our Representatives to blame.
Here is the lawsuit that had to be filed to get the information.
http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:5y2lh1-LqTMJ:www.lawandfreedom.com/site/litigation/SSA%2520Complaint.pdf+Mexico+Totalization&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=17&client=firefox-a
(snips)
1. This is an action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552,
as amended, for injunctive and other appropriate relief, to enjoin defendant from withholding
from public disclosure certain records within its possession and control and to order defendant
to release those records that were duly requested by plaintiff and wrongfully denied by
defendant.
6. It has been reported that, during the approximate period 2002-2004, the United
States Commissioner of Social Security and the Director General of the Mexican Social
Security Institute were involved in negotiating a totalization agreement between their respective
countries (hereinafter “the U.S./Mexico Social Security Totalization Agreement” or “the
totalization agreement”), and SSA has publicly announced that such an agreement has been
signed by both nations. Plaintiff believes that defendant possesses numerous documents
relative to the totalization agreement that should be disclosed under FOIA. Defendant,
however, has frustrated plaintiff’s efforts to obtain such documents over the course of the past
three years.
Plaintiff’s Initial FOIA Request
7. By letter to defendant SSA dated August 4, 2003 (Exhibit A hereto), plaintiff
requested under FOIA the disclosure of various documents related to any agreement, or
proposed agreement, between the United States and Mexico which would provide, in any
manner whatsoever, for the payment of U.S. Social Security benefits to Mexican nationals.
Plaintiff also sought a fee waiver with respect to its FOIA request, and requested expedited
processing.
8. For a period of four months, SSA did not acknowledge receipt of plaintiff’s FOIA
request, or even seek an extension of time to reply. By letter dated December 5, 2003 (Exhibit
B hereto), SSA finally responded to plaintiff’s FOIA request, granting plaintiff’s fee waiver
request and enclosing 20 documents, consisting of 133 pages, and withholding 43 other
documents — of an unstated quantity of pages — said to include “e-mails, internal handwritten
drafts, etc.” but claimed to be exempt under the deliberative process exemption of 5 U.S.C. §
Page 4
4
552(b)(5). No draft or copy of the U.S./Mexico Totalization Agreement was provided.
You nearly quoted Nancy Pelosi word for word......
In Ponzi scheme fashion, current retirees get their payments from those currently working and paying taxes.
.........................................................
I truly believe this is the reason the goverment is so quick to allow for amnesty/guest worker program. They need the influx of cash NOW. What better way to get a huge influx if we legalize 12 million workers.
Social Security is running a surplus now.
See an earlier post. Some of our legislators have been trying to stop this.
From: Feds Hide Social Security Deal With Mexico
http://community.tri-cityherald.com/?q=node/144
Virgil Goode: "The Social Security Administration and State Department should provide TREA Senior Citizens League with the information they are requesting on behalf of seniors. I support a resolution to disapprove Totalization with Mexico if and when the President signs off on this bad deal," Goode added.
AARP spokesperson, Nancy Thompson, told NewsMax her organization "has no position" on the social security totalization treaty with Mexico. (That's because they fund Maldef, Lulac, etc.)
http://community.tri-cityherald.com/?q=node/144
I don't even believe half of what I see. Which "half" do you believe?
What IS your point? Do you approve of this agreement or are you simply saying it does not exist? Which is it?
Amazing.... work in Mexico most of your life, work part of the time in USA and draw SS from American Taxpayers.
Dane -
Love your new alias.
They need the influx of cash NOW. What better way to get a huge influx if we legalize 12 million workers.
Where are the usual suspects?
My "NEW" alias?
I didn't know myself or Dane were new....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.