Skip to comments.
Livingstone Resigns, Denying Ill Intent [CLINTONISTA FLASHBACK]
The Washington Post ^
| June 27 1996
| George Lardner Jr. and Susan Schmidt
Posted on 01/02/2007 4:57:21 PM PST by Enchante
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: BW2221
That is amusing because here in GA it has been in the high seventies at least once a week... even into early December. Not every day, mind you.
But, growing up in the North, I am reminded that children used to walk to school in a foot of snow on the ground when the temperature was approaching 0 degrees fahrenheit! Imagine that.
Now, kids are driven the four blocks to school in Mommy's SUV.
To: Enchante
We had a special f'ing counsel to find out who in D.C. knew Joe Wilson bragged about sleeping with a non-spying CIA employee and yet we still do not know who hired the guy who was sifting through raw FBI files on former White House employees???? This still pisses me off to this day.
22
posted on
01/02/2007 6:39:08 PM PST
by
bpjam
(Never Give Up, Never Surrender (Unless James Baker gives you permission))
To: Enchante
23
posted on
01/02/2007 6:41:16 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(Liberalism is a hollow log and a mental disorder.)
To: Enchante
An amazing example of the incompetence of the Clinton White House is that NO ONE, absolutely NO ONE can REMEMBER who hired Livingstone as White House personnel security chief.
Check his bank records and see who cashed his check where the memo line reads, "Payment For White House Job".
24
posted on
01/02/2007 6:45:10 PM PST
by
Doctor Raoul
(BUSH KNEW liberals didn't have the balls to fight terrorism.)
To: Suzy Quzy
And the files were not just Republicans, Democrats were among the selected victims. It should be an interesting nomination process for Ms. Rodham
To: b4its2late
To: Doctor Raoul
An amazing example of the incompetence of the Clinton White House is that NO ONE, absolutely NO ONE can REMEMBER who hired Livingstone as White House personnel security chief. Didn't they, eventually, come out with the story that it had to have been Vince Foster?
I remember thinking, "Yeah, that's the only guy who can't contradict you."
27
posted on
01/02/2007 8:05:57 PM PST
by
Dianna
Comment #28 Removed by Moderator
To: BW2221
"I know news is slow because it the holiday season, but we've been getting some dumb posts. This ranks right up there with yesterday's (which was actually dated back to October) about DeKalb County (GA) schools refusing to turn the heat on before Nov. 1."
A good rule you should adopt: if you don't have anything worthwhile to say, STFU..... and if you don't know why this topic is of ongoing importance then you understand nothing of what the Clintonistas have done in the past and the threat they represent in the future.
29
posted on
01/02/2007 10:45:42 PM PST
by
Enchante
(Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
To: Suzy Quzy
This topic came to mind as I read today about the great new "ethics" agenda of the 'Rat Congress..... my mind could not help recalling some of the ethical (and legal) depravities of the Demagogues in recent years, plus the total unwillingness of most in Congress to truly investigate and act..... not to mention the servile MSM which only cares about serving up DNC talking points, etc.
Yes, I keep waiting for some enterprising reporter(s) to track down Livingstone and other Clintonista scumbags and see if any of them are more willing to talk now that they've been out in the cold for a number of years. Probably none of them ever will talk, out of self-preservation and/or continued devotion to the Clintons, but it would be great if someone could finally break open more of Filegate, Chinagate, etc. etc.
30
posted on
01/02/2007 10:51:33 PM PST
by
Enchante
(Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
To: Dianna
I had not heard that explaination, but it sounds plausible. Blame the dead guy.
31
posted on
01/02/2007 11:02:51 PM PST
by
Doctor Raoul
(BUSH KNEW liberals didn't have the balls to fight terrorism.)
To: Republican Wildcat
32
posted on
01/02/2007 11:03:54 PM PST
by
Doctor Raoul
(BUSH KNEW liberals didn't have the balls to fight terrorism.)
To: Suzy Quzy
33
posted on
01/03/2007 12:07:12 AM PST
by
Enchante
(Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
To: TWhiteBear
I know.....the Clintons have dirt on EVERYONE, yet the Dems still LOVE them.
To: BW2221
Struck a nerve with you, huh?
35
posted on
01/03/2007 4:22:52 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Enchante
When you bring up the ethical problems of the Clintons, the RINO's get all antsy. They think being NICE to the enemy makes them be NICE to us. They also think voters hate negative campaigning. The voters do not. Which is why the Dems love to use scandals against Republicans but complain when we use scandals against them.
That's why we lose elections. We don't fight like the Dems.
36
posted on
01/03/2007 4:26:38 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Republican Wildcat
LOL! Lantos is such an idiot, but he had a classic line with 'ole Craigy boy..
37
posted on
01/03/2007 5:58:11 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(Liberalism is a hollow log and a mental disorder.)
To: BW2221
You think this is old news? Just wait to see the threads a poppin' when Mrs. Slick gets the nomination.......
38
posted on
01/03/2007 5:59:32 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(Liberalism is a hollow log and a mental disorder.)
Comment #39 Removed by Moderator
To: AppyPappy
Good points, the RINOs do get all hot and bothered at the thought of confronting any Demagogues on their "culture of corruption" -- to RINOs the only way to get along with the Demagogues and the MSM is to cave in with servile pseudo-civility and kiss Hillary's ugly butt.
40
posted on
01/03/2007 9:58:18 AM PST
by
Enchante
(Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson