Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush pushes for spending control
CNN ^ | Janu8ary 3, 2007

Posted on 01/03/2007 7:46:07 AM PST by KantianBurke

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-149 next last
To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Only in your bizarro world is appropriate criticism equivalent to "hate." Speech code fan by any chance?


81 posted on 01/03/2007 8:59:40 AM PST by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
"We've got to make sure we spend the people's money wisely," the president said in a Rose Garden statement.

Quit confiscating it to begin with and let the people spend their own money, if that's what they choose.

82 posted on 01/03/2007 9:00:50 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Gawd, that's almost like Jeffrey Dahlmer pushing for a vegetarian diet.

BEST line of the day.

83 posted on 01/03/2007 9:01:02 AM PST by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
President Bush on Wednesday asked the Democratic-controlled Congress to give the White House line-item veto power to control spending.

As he prepares to deal with an opposition Congress for the first time, Bush is also asking lawmakers to extend tax cuts.

*snort* While he's at it the president should politely ask them to resign their posts in favor of their Republican challengers and then volunteer for combat duty in Iraq. If you're going to ask for something ridiculous, you might as well go all the way over the top.

84 posted on 01/03/2007 9:02:47 AM PST by Zeroisanumber (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Oh, I doubt it; the Dems will get the White House and more seats in 2008 for sure, but plenty of people here will still hate Bush.

They've done the DNC's work for them because they failed to get the big picture.

Now, rather than "having it all," they have nothing. I wonder how they're going to like that.

Of course, they will still have something to bitch about so I guess they'll still be happy.


85 posted on 01/03/2007 9:02:56 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
He didn't HAVE anything; those guys spent these last six years "positioning" themselves for their re-election

And now he has even less than nothing.

86 posted on 01/03/2007 9:03:16 AM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: kevao

It's almost comical how you people claim that there has been all of this "increased" spending, when the Annual Federal Budget has actually been reduced and the revenues have increased because of his Tax cuts.

The actual amount of total Federal spending has gone down along with the deficit and the money is simply shuffled from one program to another without increased spending.

In other words; Those who know the least, complain the most.


87 posted on 01/03/2007 9:03:58 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (MAYNARD BLAZEJEWSKI For President '08 (The "true" Conservative choice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow; All

"We've got to make sure we spend the people's money wisely," the president said in a Rose Garden statement."

Anyone have a link to Bubba's remark back during his term as to why he was opposed to tax cuts. I remember him commenting in a vein similar to Bush along the lines of "if we give te people their money back they'll waste it." Ring any bells?


88 posted on 01/03/2007 9:04:09 AM PST by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
I truly believe that in about 2007, and the Dems take the White House as well as even more seats, you will not foster so much hate for this honorable and decent man.

Well of cours it's all about politics. If the President was serious about earmarks or controlling spending he would have been pushing for that for the past 6 years. He did not. And now that the Democrats have control of Congress then it's politically expedient to now say earmarks and bad and spending is out of control. But don't expect me to believe that he has suddenly seen the light, or that he would have been pushing for either of these things had the GOP retained control.

89 posted on 01/03/2007 9:05:12 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: kevao
And now he has even less than nothing.

Thanks to the people who have been bashing him for the last seven years.

Things would have been vastly different if people who claim to be conservatives would have supported the ONLY person who could help them.

Now you'll get nothing for YEARS.

90 posted on 01/03/2007 9:05:28 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
SCOTUS also basically found that Congress did not have the authority to give away any of its enumerated powers to the president.

Oh, my aching sides.

91 posted on 01/03/2007 9:06:07 AM PST by Romulus (Quomodo sedet sola civitas plena populo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
It's almost comical how you people claim that there has been all of this "increased" spending

Claim? CLAIM?

Education spending (NO Child Left Behind).

Medicare Prescription Benefit. Huge programs, just for starters.

If you are relying on bogus federal bookkeeping to make your point, please, I've got an investor in Nigeria who would love to make your acquaintence.

92 posted on 01/03/2007 9:06:16 AM PST by dirtboy (Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
I think the one living in a "Bizarro" world is you. The big picture is way beyond your logical scope.
93 posted on 01/03/2007 9:06:49 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (MAYNARD BLAZEJEWSKI For President '08 (The "true" Conservative choice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

Yeah, Congress can't give away its own powers. Only SCOTUS can take powers away from Congress.


94 posted on 01/03/2007 9:06:54 AM PST by dirtboy (Objects in tagline are closer than they appear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke

How on earth can you equate saying we've got to spend the tax money wisely with Clinton saying you can't have your money back because we might not like the way you spend it?


95 posted on 01/03/2007 9:07:13 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

Comment #96 Removed by Moderator

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/tables.html

The White House's own numbers show you to be incorrect.

The Heritage foundation also put together a nice little PDF that shows you to be incorrect as well:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/upload/83722_1.pdf


97 posted on 01/03/2007 9:09:12 AM PST by Adammon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
There you go Projecting again! Hypothesizing future events and forming opinions based on possible outcomes is not a mentally healthy practice.
98 posted on 01/03/2007 9:10:00 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (MAYNARD BLAZEJEWSKI For President '08 (The "true" Conservative choice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
When Jorge offers a plan that cut's the state department by 60%

Another one issue moonbat heard from.

99 posted on 01/03/2007 9:11:28 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

"Annual Federal Budget has actually been reduced...The actual amount of total Federal spending has gone down..."

Say What? What dimension are you from? What color is the sky on your world?


100 posted on 01/03/2007 9:12:47 AM PST by Go_Raiders ("Being able to catch well in a crowd just means you can't get open, that's all." -- James Lofton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson