Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Day in the Life of President Bush (photos): 1-4-07
www .yahoo.com/news www.whitehouse.gov/news ^ | 4th January 2007 | Snugs

Posted on 01/04/2007 5:40:04 PM PST by snugs

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last
To: DrDeb

Damn get well Mr Former President

He going be in hospital for day he get out right I hear that from other Freepers DAMN Bush 41 is tough old bird


141 posted on 01/04/2007 8:02:14 PM PST by SevenofNine ("Step aside Jefe"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ilovew
I had to avoid the news today. If I saw one picture of Pelosi, I was going to throw upMe, too. I really didn't even want to hear about it--much less see the photos! :)
142 posted on 01/04/2007 8:17:11 PM PST by dmd25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: snugs

These pictures are so cute, Snugs!


143 posted on 01/04/2007 8:17:39 PM PST by dmd25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: altura

Do you think that is because for them often it becomes their religion and is therefore the most important thing in their world and they are so convinced that this is the only way.


144 posted on 01/04/2007 8:17:57 PM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: dmd25
I know and for that brief moment politics is forgotten and it is 2 grandfather together and one grandfather appreciating what all kids like to get many signatures and if possible someone famous. Regardless of the fact the VP is on the other side politically to his grandfather he will proudly show that signature off knowing that no other kid at school will have had such an important one on their cast.
145 posted on 01/04/2007 8:22:47 PM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: dmd25

Seriously. Besides, I don't need the news to tell me that the dems were taking over today. And I certainly didn't need any Pelosi biographies.


146 posted on 01/04/2007 8:23:49 PM PST by ilovew ("Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." --J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: snugs

Hi, all....Thanks, Snugs....GREAT dose.....even if the opposition gets to be here too.....guess it's good to get a start on getting used to the next 2 years.

Nice to see Ms. Merkel here today, too. The President had a busy day.....


147 posted on 01/04/2007 8:24:36 PM PST by goodnesswins (When a "religion" has no commandments.....no wonder no one wants to go to Church on Sunday!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snugs
You are so right. What a neat moment for both the child and the grandfather. The boy has a great 'show and tell' for school!

Thanks for your work today, Snugs. This can't have been one of the more fun ones to put together! I did love GWB's blue tie, though. :) That was a bright spot! Prayers up for quick healing for GHWB. My parents both said that they noticed his limp the other day at the funeral.

Thanks again!

148 posted on 01/04/2007 8:27:39 PM PST by dmd25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: snugs

Yes, it is their religion and they feel nothing but contempt for people who don't see things their way.

I just happened to click on a thread about an incident at the border and I literally could not believe the Bush hatred on that thread.

It was like something on the Dem underground. This Day in the Life thread was mentioned with derision and we were all dismissed as Bush-worshiping idiots.

I didn't bother to even post. Not one person on that thread had a good thing to say about our President. I know they are all border control fanatics but still ....

very disappointing.


149 posted on 01/04/2007 8:32:22 PM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: altura

sad when people cannot agree to disagree without either falling out or being unpleasant and often irrational


150 posted on 01/04/2007 8:44:59 PM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: snugs; All
It was not too many years ago that both political parties had both liberals and conservatives. The New England Republicans tended to be pretty liberal and the Southern Democrats were quite conservative.

This really effected the house. Even when the Democrats had large majorities, a combination of the Midwest and Western Republican Conservators combined with the Southern Democrat Conservatives could block liberal legislation. Sometimes they had to votes to bypass committee leaders and bring a bill to the house floor for an up or down vote.

In the Senate combinations of Conservative Southern Senators and Conservative Republican Senators could force passage of Conservative bills. Neither party dared trash conservatives or liberals. Both parties contained members that spanned the political spectrum.

By the same token often the combination of Liberal New England Republicans and Liberal mid western Democrats could pass Liberal legislation. Both parties had to cooperate.

But since it often took cooperation between the two parties to get anything done, neither party leadership could afford to trash the opposition party or liberals or Conservatives. Both parties had both liberals and conservatives.

Today all Conservatives are in the Republican party. In addtion only a very few liberals remain in the Republican party. Of the remaining liberals in the Republican party only Specter, and the two Main Senators come to mind. The Democratic party is almost entirely made up of liberals

But the Senate rules are a major problem for the majority party. To effectively rule the Senate the majority party must find a way to get 60 of the 100 Senate votes.

Today the Democrats can at best count on perhaps 53 votes. That is 50 democrats and 3 Republican votes. But they need 60 votes to get anything passed that most Republicans want blocked.

Today we are hearing about all the legislation that Nancy Pelosi's house is planning to pass. The problem for the Democrats is they don't have a snowballs chance in Hades of getting most of those bills through the Senate. And unless those bills pass both houses, there is no need for the President to Veto unpassed bills. But even those that pass can easily be vetoed.

What has President Bush who will never ever be running for office again got to lose by blocking every attempt by Democrats to enact their agenda? The worst that could happen is the President will win huge praise from the Republican and conservative base.

But the Democrats and the media have made a big deal out of the Democratic victory. The Democratic base is not very knowledgeable. Labor Union members and Democrats in general are expecting their Liberal agenda to be enacted.

When that Dumb, Stupid, Ignorant and Inept Bush manages to stop the passage of the Democratic agenda the liberals will be ticked. The Democratic base will be angry that the Democrat "Controlled" congress can not pass bills. They will draw the conclusion that Democrats who can't "out Smart" G.W. Bush are not worthy of re-election.

The simple truth is the Democrats need 10 Republicans to vote with them to get Senate passage of any bill the Republicans and/or the president opposes. Republicans have seen how it works when the Democrats blocked the Conservative agenda for the last few years. The Conservatives responded to what they saw as unexcused failure by letting the Democrats win the House and Senate.

In two years it is likely that the Democrats will have failed to pass much of anything the liberals want passed. It is quite likely the rank and file will blame the Democrats in congress for allowing Bush and his "stooges in the Congress" to block the Democrats even with the Democrats in charge of both houses of congress.

Republicans know full well what happens when they fail to do what the base wants done. They know that blocking the Democrats from doing what the liberal base wants will produce the same reaction in the Democratic party.

The kickers are the 60 percent majority it takes to break a filibuster and the 60 percent majority it takes to override a veto.

The Democrats will not have either. So to an even lessor extent the Democrats will control congress than the Republicans did for the last 4 years.

What the Democrats will be able to do is hold hearings to "investigate" the Bush administration. But the President and Republican members of congress can respond by refusing to allow passage of almost everything. Bush's poll numbers are so low that blocking the Democrat agenda can only improve his job approval numbers. There is nothing the Democrats can do but drop the investigations.

Otherwise the Republicans can run the 2008 campaign on "Did the Democrat congress fix (Name anything Democrats want passed)?? The answer is NO. The Democrats were too busy trying nail President Bush."

The Unions will be ticked. They wanted legislation that would allow them to more easily organize companies. They could care less if Bush is nailed or not. Academia wants more federal money for their pet projects. They could care less if Bush is nailed to a wall.

Go through the entire Democratic coalition and they all have bills they have been waiting since 1980 to get passed. They will look upon the Bush attacks as keeping them from getting the legislation they want.

If the Democrats do as they are planning.. investigating the Bush administration to cover the fact that they do not have the votes to get anything passed and enacted, they will only convince the Liberal base that the Democratic congress has blown its chance.

I suspect the 2008 election will be for the Democrats what the 1948 election was for Republicans. The Republicans won the house and senate in 1946. But all they could accomplish was attacking Truman. It did not work. The Republicans wanted cut backs in federal programs, they wanted the economy fixed. What they got was attacks on Truman because they did not have the votes to pass legislation.

History does repeat. Nancy Pelosi can pass anything she wants to have passed in the House. But Reid can't get diddle passed in the Senate and if he does get some stuff passed, it will be vetoed by the President.

To get anything done at all, the Democrats will have to suck up to the hated Republicans. That really ticks off the base.

The liberal base will find that the most despicable act of all.


151 posted on 01/04/2007 9:10:12 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: snugs
White House Photos


152 posted on 01/04/2007 9:14:30 PM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: snugs


153 posted on 01/04/2007 9:16:23 PM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: snugs


154 posted on 01/04/2007 9:18:19 PM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: snugs

NICE!


155 posted on 01/04/2007 9:19:42 PM PST by onyx (DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: snugs

Beautiful roses and I love the close up pic of POTUS.


156 posted on 01/04/2007 9:20:38 PM PST by onyx (DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator

Thanks for your interesting and informative post


157 posted on 01/04/2007 9:26:00 PM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: All

158 posted on 01/04/2007 9:27:08 PM PST by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: snugs

I'm thinking of how the Veep could have done the nation a great service at this point...but it would be wrong.

159 posted on 01/04/2007 9:34:46 PM PST by RichInOC (NO! BAD Rich!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

re: 159
...wrong but necessary!!! :)


160 posted on 01/04/2007 9:38:23 PM PST by MeekMom (Present your bodies a living sacrifice unto God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson