Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats: Nuclear Iran unacceptable
Jerusalem Post ^ | January 7, 2007 | HILARY LEILA KRIEGER

Posted on 01/06/2007 3:46:21 PM PST by West Coast Conservative

Iran with nuclear weapons is unacceptable, new House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer told The Jerusalem Post hours after entering the party leadership position.

The Maryland Democrat said the view is shared by his party, rejecting assertions that the Democrats would be weaker than the Republicans on Iran.

He also said that the use of force against Teheran remained an option.

Hoyer, second only in the hierarchy of the House of Representatives to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, is charged with articulating and strategizing on party policy.

He spoke to the Post on Thursday, the opening day of the 110th Congress, after making an appearance at the National Jewish Democratic Council reception honoring the six new Jewish members of Congress.

The council gathering was one of scores of events on Capitol Hill held to celebrate the start of the new session.

Hoyer is considered close to the Jewish community and many Israel supporters have hailed his elevation in the House.

He was one of the few non-Jewish lawmakers to attend the council reception.

Hoyer said the Democrats' position, like that of the Bush administration, was that preventing a nuclear-armed Iran had to be done through "discussions, negotiations, sanctions." Hoyer added that the US needed to work with the international community to block Teheran's nuclear ambitions.

At the same time, Hoyer said the use of force hadn't been taken off the table.

"I've not ruled that out," he said, but added, "It's not an option we want to consider until we know there is no other option."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: democrat; geopolitics; hoyer; iran; proliferation

1 posted on 01/06/2007 3:46:22 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Perhaps there is hope that a Pelosi-led Congress won't destroy our country after all---

BWAHAHA!

OK, that was a bit much to pull off...


2 posted on 01/06/2007 3:48:04 PM PST by Lunatic Fringe (Say "NO" to the Trans-Texas Corridor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Empty rhetoric.


3 posted on 01/06/2007 3:48:49 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Why can't Republicans stand up to Democrats like they do to terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
Democrats: Nuclear Iran unacceptable

Or else..or else.. we will have to raise our voices and write them in a stern letter in all caps and font size 16.

4 posted on 01/06/2007 3:50:02 PM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Hoyer said the Democrats' position, like that of the Bush administration, was that preventing a nuclear-armed Iran had to be done through "discussions, negotiations, sanctions."

Brilliant!


5 posted on 01/06/2007 3:50:26 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

I hate typos.. Ignore the "in".


6 posted on 01/06/2007 3:50:47 PM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Yeah, this is on the same order as Bill Clinton saying that he wouldn't rest until the embassy bombers/Cole bombers were brought to justice.


7 posted on 01/06/2007 3:51:24 PM PST by denydenydeny ("We have always been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be detested in France"--Wellington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Iran better watch out or the democrats will run to the UN again.


8 posted on 01/06/2007 3:58:28 PM PST by aomagrat (Let not your heart be troubled: Ye believe in God, believe ye also in gunboats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
They're ready to raise the white flag on Iraq and go to war in Iran? North Korea?

Looks like the rhetoric returns and the action retreats. Typical dems.

9 posted on 01/06/2007 4:06:51 PM PST by OldFriend (THE PRESS IS AN EVIL FOR WHICH THERE IS NO REMEDY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

The Democrats say a nuclear Iran is unacceptable. But they thought a nuclear Iraq was acceptable. Saddam was well on his way.


10 posted on 01/06/2007 4:10:42 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Well then, that is the end of it.

Nuclear Iran is unacceptable.

What is next on the agenda?


11 posted on 01/06/2007 4:11:46 PM PST by Radix (There is no Allah in Valhalla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
The dems will spend the next two years voicing opinions on both sides of every issue that arises:
No more troops / nuclear Iran 'unacceptable'
Fiscal responsibility / more goodies to the masses
Negotiate with Iraq's neighbors / get tough on the 'insurgents'.
They seem on track to claim 'bipartisanship' as theirs while assuring there will be none in congress.
They are talking tough on the border far better than GWB and the Pubbies did and they will do no more or less than has been done to date.

They are already claiming that the electronic voting machines they insisted on after Florida are a republican plot to steal elections.
Headlines today talked about the 2007 economic 'bounce back' when the pre-2007 economy is in almost heroic shape already.

When 2008 rolls around they will be able to claim the high ground, whatever it turns out to be, as their very own.

And, (I predict) they will have a 'legitimate' black man on their ticket (for VP) just in case the Pub's try to run an 'oreo' (possibly female) conservative on theirs.

Maybe I'll feel hopeful later, but so far; nope.

12 posted on 01/06/2007 4:12:09 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Didn't they adopt the same kind of tone when they passed the Iraq Liberation Act in 1998? The Democrat policy is to talk tough, then pull the rug out from under the US and the troops when action is taken.


13 posted on 01/06/2007 4:13:00 PM PST by BusterBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Spoken by the party without testicles.


14 posted on 01/06/2007 4:14:09 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Well, it's 2007. Time to get ready for 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

We're fierce!

We're frightening!


We're Democrats?


15 posted on 01/06/2007 4:15:39 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Oh, it is unacceptable. OK then. Sure must not be happening. Because from here, watching them throw every pacifist brickbat they can find at the president, it sure looks like they wouldn't accept the slightest military action to put out their grandmother if she were on fire.
16 posted on 01/06/2007 4:15:59 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
The Maryland Democrat said the view is shared by his party, rejecting assertions that the Democrats would be weaker than the Republicans on Iran.

OK, Steny, you get to break the news to Peace Mom. ;)

17 posted on 01/06/2007 4:17:05 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

"unacceptable" ? Sounds like Steny Hoyer has hired Chirac"s speechwriter.


18 posted on 01/06/2007 4:18:58 PM PST by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Yeah, right. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei stated that the Republican defeat at the polls "is actually an obvious victory for the Iranian nation." SOURCE.

"Stop or we'll negotiate!"

19 posted on 01/06/2007 4:19:25 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

All the dems wanted was power. Now they got it.


20 posted on 01/06/2007 4:19:37 PM PST by Porterville (Destroy the Death Culture of Socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Hoyer added that the US needed to work with the international community to block Teheran's nuclear ambitions.


I think I preferr Israel's approach.

21 posted on 01/06/2007 4:22:05 PM PST by MAexile (Bats left, votes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

"The Maryland Democrat said the view is shared by his party, rejecting assertions that the Democrats would be weaker than the Republicans on Iran."

PROVE IT. Talk is cheap.


22 posted on 01/06/2007 4:24:08 PM PST by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
Yeah, this is on the same order as Bill Clinton saying that he wouldn't rest until the embassy bombers/Cole bombers were brought to justice.

He settled for a campaign contribution instead.

23 posted on 01/06/2007 4:24:10 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Well, it's 2007. Time to get ready for 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

And a STERNLY worded letter will follow.


24 posted on 01/06/2007 4:24:42 PM PST by word_warrior_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
"I've not ruled that out," he said, but added, "It's not an option we want to consider until we know there is no other option."

Hey Steny, I got news for you...that's not your call.

I'd like to see what he'd say about that to al-Jazeera.

25 posted on 01/06/2007 4:29:31 PM PST by Night Hides Not
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Yeah, the all-mighty strongly worded letter will keep us safe.

The Dems are against preemptive strikes because they want the enemy to attack us first. I can't figure out if they see some sort of value in being a victim, of if they hate America, or both. (Well, actually I can, the answer is all of the above.)


26 posted on 01/06/2007 4:29:52 PM PST by JHBowden (President Giuliani in 2008! Law and Order. Solid Judges. Free Markets. Killing Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Oh, good. Then the Dem Congress won't mind when somebody else does something about the nuclear Iran or the nuclear N Kor.


27 posted on 01/06/2007 4:31:22 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Democrats: Nuclear Iran unacceptable

Looks like the Democrats are already trying to get some innoculation.
To being blamed when Iran goes fully nuclear and starts handing
them out gratis to every Ackmed, Muhammed and Harry that
will promise to use them covertly against The Great Satan and Israel.
28 posted on 01/06/2007 4:34:09 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Democrats: Nuclear Iran unacceptable

Their real message: "Democrats: Nuclear Nuking Iran unacceptable.

29 posted on 01/06/2007 4:34:25 PM PST by melt (Someday, they'll wish their Jihad... Jihadn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Spoken by the party without testicles.

And without a brain or a clue about anything except grabbing power for themselves.

30 posted on 01/06/2007 4:35:11 PM PST by prophetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

DemocRATS have cojones?

Don't think so. 'Pod.


31 posted on 01/06/2007 4:35:29 PM PST by sauropod ("Men would appreciate women's minds more if they bounced gently when they walked. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Selected to this high profile position to be credible to do some splaining to Lucy and Desi Mohammed back in Michigan when stuff goes down in the land of Mordor? Hoyer that is.


32 posted on 01/06/2007 4:36:01 PM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

The Democrats may - and it's a big may - accept Israel defending itself. If so, that's a step forward. They've wanted to lose or believe we were losing every war since Vietnam to include the Cold War. They also did their best to stop Lincoln too, so they've a long history of being defeatists.


33 posted on 01/06/2007 4:38:32 PM PST by elhombrelibre (Saddam was against Iraq's liberation before the Democrats and MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjp2005

http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Park/2326/wabbit1.html

I equate the democrats to the Elephant in Rabbit Fire, a great Bugs Bunny Cartoon. Look what the elephant says in line 76 for the democratic threat, brings back memories.


34 posted on 01/06/2007 4:39:02 PM PST by word_warrior_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: norton

You're right. All the dems know how to do is play politics, talk a lot and put the squeeze on wealthy people and big corporations.


35 posted on 01/06/2007 4:40:05 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

yup... just kicking the can down the street ( they hope ) for the next congress to deal with .. that is ? if it's not to late by then.


36 posted on 01/06/2007 5:37:06 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

6 o 7 years ago these same Dems were saying that a nuclear Iraq was unacceptable.

Well, come 2012 they can pull out the same speeches demanding that Prsident Romney pull out of Iran.


37 posted on 01/06/2007 6:22:07 PM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Democrats: Nuclear Iran unacceptable

The surrendering begins right after the posturing ends.

38 posted on 01/06/2007 6:57:54 PM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob

Lol. I dont recall the episode, but would be even more classic if it was a donkey.


39 posted on 01/06/2007 7:05:02 PM PST by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson