New York Times Admits to a Blatant Lie

Concerned Women for America ^ | 1/4/07 | Janice Shaw Crouse

[MHGinTN]

I likes my coffee ... and if you look back through my posting history, you will see that I have taken that very tactic regarding the democraps, especially in their incessant defense of the indefensible slaughter of alive unboren children. For the children indeed! Specious ghouls ...

[nmh]

The NYT is all the news UNFIT to print.

[muir_redwoods]

"Mr. Calame said, "The care taken in the reporting and editing of this example didn't meet the magazine's normal standards."

Sadly, it did

[M-cubed]

Always remember....

A conservative bases his politics on his morals...

A liberal bases his morals on his politics....

[gcruse]

--metaphorically true--

That's what you get when 'fake but accurate' puts on her best lipstick and leaves her sty, trailing grunts.

[PAR35]

The New York Times management has now fully addressed the problem identified in the story. They are going to abolish the ombudsman position, to ensure that they are not embarrased in this way again.

[wagglebee]

Yep. I can hear it now, "sorry, we don't have anyone to write retractions any longer, we only print the truth and don't need to bother with any of you 'little people' implying otherwise."

[Jacquerie]

"A conservative bases his politics on his morals...

A liberal bases his morals on his politics...."

Whoa, that is good! With your permission, I intend to regularly plagiarize your quote.

[M-cubed]

Go for it!!...I thought the same thing and borrowed it from a fellow Freeper a year or 2 ago...( It really is a great synopsis of the Libs, isn't it!!)