Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran raid 'will be nuclear disaster'
gulf daily ^ | 9th January 2007 | TARIQ KHONJI

Posted on 01/08/2007 4:53:59 PM PST by Flavius

ENVIRONMENTAL contamination could affect the region if Israel goes ahead with reported plans to attack Iran's uranium enrichment facilities or if there is an earthquake, a Bahraini expert warned yesterday.

However, Bahrain University physics professor Dr Waheeb Alnaser said things could be much worse if Israel decides to attack the power plant in Bushehr.

He said alleged plans by Israel to attack facilities in Natanz, Arak and near Isfahan would result in limited damage to the environment.

This is because neither the weapons that would be used nor the uranium located there is highly active.

But Dr Alnaser fears that Israel may go even further by attacking Iran's power plant in Bushehr, describing this as a major disaster for the whole region.

"I'm not saying there would be no environmental damage from attacking these uranium enrichment plants, but the danger is 100 times worse if they attack an active nuclear reactor - especially after three or four years of operation when the uranium will be highly active," he said.

"Israel hasn't named the plant as one of its targets, but you never know with Israel. War is all about lies, they may say one thing and do another."

Dr Alnaser said that winds would carry the pollution to the GCC countries, potentially making them uninhabitable.

From an environmental standpoint, destroying uranium before it becomes radioactive is much better than when it is in operation in a nuclear plant, he explained.

"This type of uranium when not radioactive can be handled wearing gloves and you can stand next to it safely without being harmed," he said.

"It is much safer than when it is in the core of a nuclear power plant."

Dr Alnaser said destroying inactive uranium, while harmful to the environment, might be no more dangerous than waste products - including gases that may be emitted by Iran in its usage of the material for nuclear energy.

"At least this way the pollution would be one-off, instead of having continuous nuclear activity at our doorstep," he continued.

He added that he did not support military action against Iran.

Dr Alnaser was responding to a report in the Sunday Times that Israel had drawn up plans to destroy Iran's uranium enrichment facilities in a tactical nuclear strike.

The Jewish state has denied the report, although Iran warned that it would hit back if attacked.

Dr Alnaser said Iran needed to become more transparent with its nuclear policies.

He also severely criticised the International Atomic Energy Agency for failing to uncover Iran's heavy water plant, which can be used to produce Tritium, a main ingredient in atomic bombs.

"The Americans had been warning of this, but we dismissed it because they often lie about such things," he explained.

"It turns out, however, that they were speaking the truth. The agency failed to uncover this and we only found out after Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced it himself."

Dr Alnaser said Iran could have very easily built its nuclear power plant on the Arabian Sea, where there are no countries nearby, but insisted on building it in Bushehr - which is closer to the Gulf countries than it is to Tehran.

"If Iran wants the rest of the world to care about its environment in the event of a nuclear strike, it should also take into consideration the concerns of neighbouring countries. It didn't do this," he continued.

Dr Alnaser said a regional nuclear disaster could occur as a result of unforeseen events such as an earthquake.

"How can we trust a country that was unable to help its own people during the 2004 earthquake in Iran? They had to rely on help from their enemies, the Americans," he said.

"An earthquake in the location of the nuclear power plant could very well cause a disaster.

"We don't have sufficient information about what precautions are being taken because there is no transparency."

Dr Alnaser called on all GCC countries to purchase devices that would detect radioactive pollutants in the air that could drift from Iran.

"Qatar has bought such equipment and I understand that Kuwait is planning to. We should have had these in place a long time ago," he said.

"This pollution could be a major factor in causing cancer. Instead we are only concentrating on local industries and other sources."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bombirannow; bomboilpipelines; iran; proliferation

1 posted on 01/08/2007 4:54:01 PM PST by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flavius
The Jewish state has denied the report, although Iran warned that it would hit back if attacked.

If the Arabs are wanting another 6 day arse kicking , give it to them. This time, it will be in one day.

2 posted on 01/08/2007 4:58:17 PM PST by mosquewatch.com (The trouble starts with an "I" and ends with a "slam".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Which is worse, An efficient nuke hitting Iran with limited fall out over less populated areas of the Asia and the ME, or a or poor yield weapon spreading Lord knows how many isotopes all over Europe.
3 posted on 01/08/2007 5:00:06 PM PST by oyez (Why is it that egalitarians act like royalty?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosquewatch.com

Dr Alnaser = Ed Asner!


4 posted on 01/08/2007 5:03:38 PM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

Oy Vey!!!


5 posted on 01/08/2007 5:10:30 PM PST by mosquewatch.com (The trouble starts with an "I" and ends with a "slam".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Maybe the Iranians should have thought of this (environmental damage) before they built a nuclear weapons program. Perhaps the Europeans will allow the Israelis to buy "carbon credits" and then attack Iran.


6 posted on 01/08/2007 5:11:35 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Haley Barbour/John Bolton 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Somebody look at a map. Then tell me how far from Tel Aviv to Tehran. Then tell me how many hostile countrys one must fly over.

Then tell me air defenses in hostile countrys not counting Iran. Then fill me in on air defenses on Iran.

Add all those questions up and I suspect, but do not know, this is a no go operation cooked up in some journalist's brain.


7 posted on 01/08/2007 5:14:55 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Everyone in the ME wants Iran taken apart. Everyone is scared to death of them.


8 posted on 01/08/2007 5:18:40 PM PST by TexanToTheCore (If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Why couldn't we just do it with a Stealth and then let Israel take the credit for it?


9 posted on 01/08/2007 5:20:38 PM PST by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: oyez
Which is worse, An efficient nuke hitting Iran with limited fall out over less populated areas of the Asia and the ME, or a or poor yield weapon spreading Lord knows how many isotopes all over Europe.

If I were Israel, I wouldn't give a rat's ass which.

10 posted on 01/08/2007 5:21:49 PM PST by appleharvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
ENVIRONMENTAL contamination could affect the region if Israel goes ahead with reported plans to attack Iran's uranium enrichment facilities or if there is an earthquake, a Bahraini expert warned yesterday.

I predict an earthquake in the region.

11 posted on 01/08/2007 5:25:39 PM PST by DejaJude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Nuclear weapons are only safe when in the hands of communists and muslims.
12 posted on 01/08/2007 5:34:22 PM PST by MrBambaLaMamba (Buy 'Allah' brand urinal cakes - If you can't kill the enemy at least you can piss on their god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Does the word "Popeye" mean anything to you?

Semper Fi
An Old Man

13 posted on 01/08/2007 5:43:45 PM PST by An Old Man (USMC 1956 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MrBambaLaMamba
When Saddam's retreating armies set fire to the oil wells in Kuwait, it was an environmental crime that would last for decades. per MSM

Have they put out any of the burning wells to date? (/s)

14 posted on 01/08/2007 5:47:12 PM PST by TYVets (God so loved the world he didn't send a committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Earthquakes and Iran go hand in hand, like al-Qaeda and hell.

Israel has to do what it needs to protect itself before it's too late.


15 posted on 01/08/2007 5:48:57 PM PST by period end of story (I miss 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TYVets
Since the beginning of the nuclear age scientists, politicians, sf writers, TV, movies and environmentalists have been warning of the dangers inherent in atomic energy and weapons: Godzilla, birth defects and nuclear winter.

Of course the greatest fear of the all the naysayers was the use of atomic energy or weapons to eliminate totalitarian socialism.
16 posted on 01/08/2007 6:11:58 PM PST by MrBambaLaMamba (Buy 'Allah' brand urinal cakes - If you can't kill the enemy at least you can piss on their god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: appleharvey

If I were Israel, I'd be damned sure the later didn't happen.


17 posted on 01/08/2007 6:23:46 PM PST by oyez (Why is it that egalitarians act like royalty?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Fortunately for the environmental pinheads, when Iran detonates a nuc.............that won't cause any environmental damage.............right.


18 posted on 01/08/2007 6:57:50 PM PST by newcthem (George Bush's legacy.....a war with an enemy that can't be named and the "Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrBambaLaMamba

Watching that PBS special on anti-Semitism in the 21st century right now...


19 posted on 01/08/2007 7:32:25 PM PST by canadianally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Sub launched missles....


20 posted on 01/09/2007 9:16:13 AM PST by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Israel has orbital capabilities -- the capability to drop ground-launched missiles anywhere in Iran is not an issue.

They also have missile-capable subs, and cruise missiles, too.

Air defenses are not an obstacle.

21 posted on 01/09/2007 9:31:44 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
More crying and teeth gnashing .

Go Israel do what Europe and others do not have the guts to do, that is protect themselves from the bloody religion of piece, Islam.
22 posted on 01/09/2007 9:36:19 AM PST by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia now a certified socialist state reporting to Mexico City for further instructions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
There must be some Ashkenazim someplace in the government with exceptional IQs.

Dropping nuclear weapons from an orbital device or with long range orbital rockets would be a first class mistake.

Not only would it set precedent for similar actions against Israel but it would inflame the Arab world like nothing else would. The US would be unable to veto any condemnation or action by the UN as a consequence.

Belligerence and threats--I repeat--are not a policy alternative in this situation. You know, "...speak softly and keep a big stick.."
23 posted on 01/09/2007 10:01:27 AM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Dropping nuclear weapons from an orbital device or with long range orbital rockets would be a first class mistake.

You misunderstand. It's not the use of orbital rockets for ICBMs (which is really not hard to do, btw); it's one of technological capabilities in regard to rocket performance.

Iran doesn't have missiles with sufficient performance (i.e., range) to hit Israel.

Israel, OTOH, knows how to make rockets with orbital capability, which says they don't have the missile performance issues that Iran does. Range is not a problem for them -- they can hit Iran.

BTW -- did you know that the only thing separating a ICBM from an orbital rocket is that the latter has an upper stage, and the former does not? Both we and the Russians have successfully converted ICBMs for orbital use.

24 posted on 01/09/2007 10:09:02 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Bahrain University physics professor Dr Waheeb Alnaser said

This one may have been talking to Michio Kaku. They want us to fear the atom.

25 posted on 01/09/2007 10:14:22 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

I would say that's Iran's problem...


26 posted on 01/09/2007 10:14:54 AM PST by Little Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Iran doesn't have missiles with sufficient performance (i.e., range) to hit Israel

You know more on this subject than I but you are assuming what is now stays now. There will be enough smart Iranians, Pakistanis and others to either develop or buy this technology.

The only similarity I can think of is in 1862 my ancestors suddenly found the Dakota people were killing them right and left. They killed with state-of-the-art rifled rifles while most of the settlers had smooth bores. It took Abraham Lincoln sending General Pope (I think that was his name) and artillery to chase the Dakotas out onto the Dakota plains and into Canada.

People who think in slogans act in bullets and if it takes more than bullets they will match you weapon for weapon.

People hate Jews and the State of Israel not because of failure but because of success. You need a strong political effort at attenuating the Iranian situation knowing full well of your liability--being hated for being successful. As I said before, there must be some smart Jews in the government. In the meantime, threats just reinforce the negative perceptions of Jews and Israel.

27 posted on 01/09/2007 10:25:08 AM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Flavius; Peanut Gallery
if there is an earthquake

Isreal can create earthquakes? Cool.

funny how this is lost by the screaming headline.

28 posted on 01/09/2007 10:35:45 AM PST by Professional Engineer (When did my beard turn the same color as my shirt collar?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Your original comment had to do with air defenses. My response was, simply, that Israel's capability to reach orbit, means they can also reach Iran ... without having to worry about air defenses.

There will be enough smart Iranians, Pakistanis and others to either develop ... this technology.

And yet they have not. I can only guess at the reasons for this, but I think it's primarily the lack of an indigenous a high tech infrastructure (especially specialty metals and high-precision machining).

... or buy ...

The fact that they have not bought it yet, shows that nobody who can make this stuff -- even the Russians or Chinese -- is stupid enough to sell it to the Iranians, North Koreans, or other whackjobs.

29 posted on 01/09/2007 10:56:56 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

This is as bad as all the exaggeration about how bad Chernobyl would be. Next thing you know, they'll trot out "nuclear winter."


30 posted on 01/09/2007 10:59:31 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson