Skip to comments.Hilali Calls Westerners "Liars" In Latest Rant (More wonderful racism from Islamofascists)
Posted on 01/11/2007 7:46:34 PM PST by PRePublic
Hilali Calls Westerners "Liars" In Latest Rant
Sydney, Australia (AHN) - Controversial mufti Sheik Taj al-Din al-Hilali has again angered both Muslims and Australians by speaking out about his faith and current homeland.
Sheik Hilali participated in an Egyptian television interview where he made claims that his people have more entitlement to Australia than those with a convict heritage and continued to express his disdain towards westerners.
He said, "The Western people are the biggest liars and oppressors and especially the English race."
Muslims 'more Australian than Anglos' Courier Mail, Australia - CONTROVERSIAL Islamic cleric Taj al-Din al-Hilali has reportedly claimed Muslims have more right to be in Australia than people of Anglo-Saxon descent ...
Don't worry, the Bush bots will post a picture of our President crying, and say it's a good thing.
If you think the Commander-in-Chief shedding tears while awarding a posthumous Medal of Honor to a Marine's family is somehow a sign of weakness, you are beyond contempt.
You are a A**hole.
The Koran permits (even encourages) lying.
The Holy Bible does not.
Good work. Keep it up.
Actually the whole thing brought tears to my eyes, too. Anyone who doesn't understand why that should be lacks understanding.
No Sir I don't see it as a sign of weakness, our enemies do. I see him crying as a man with a great heart. Our enemies will see him as a coward. What part of this don't you get?
I'm not a Bush not, but I do think it is a good thing. But we tried to explain the reasons on another thread. Guess you haven't thought this one thru yet.
Have you ever been to a military service? Or a ceremony of such importance? Probably not. Hope you do, and then tell us if you were moved or not.
Funny that you used the term "bot" because, obviously, you think the President is one.
Well, the guy IS an islamo-moron...
There have been many times on paltalk I have openly wept for Muslim children and the Muslims berated me for it. I'm talking about how our enemies feel, not the President.
Yes my Sister, and both my Nephews are in the Military. Been too the sand pit. I've been too funerals, heard TAPS play. My Father was in the Air Force. Again , I'm not berating President Bush, I was just trying too point out how the enemy will view him.
Mark, Winston Churchill often referred to the "British race". It is a British (and apparently the Australian) way to classify nationality.
Yes this would include the great "American race" The emphasis is on a nationality not color.
"No Sir I don't see it as a sign of weakness, our enemies do. I see him crying as a man with a great heart. Our enemies will see him as a coward. What part of this don't you get?"
Our enemies will find fault for whatever they dream up. We can not live our lives by their standards. I think you are wrong about them seeing him as a coward, since they are VERY emotional. What part of this don't you get?
I say we agree too disagree. And I wish the best too you and yours. That is something our common enemy will never say. I never meant any disrespect to the President I voted for.
Perhaps the question of "knee jerk reaction" that you posited to Spruce should be to yourself. Your initial posts have been anything but what you have put forth in this last message. Had you communicated in this way, then you would have had a different response.
This book challenges some of our longest held assumptions about the differences between Anglo-Saxons and Celts perceived differences that have informed our collective sense of identity.Orthodox history has long taught that the Romans found a uniformly Celtic population throughout the British Isles, but that the peoples of the English heartland fell victim to genocide by the Anglo-Saxon hordes during the fifth and sixth centuries.
Now Stephen Oppenheimers groundbreaking genetic research has revealed that the Anglo-Saxon invasion contributed only a tiny fraction to the English gene pool. In fact, three quarters of English people can trace an unbroken line of genetic descent through their parental genes from settlers arriving long before the introduction of farming.
Synthesizing the genetic evidence with linguistics, archaeology and the historical record, Oppenheimer shows how long-term Scandinavian trade and immigration contributed the remaining quarter mostly before the arrival of the Anglo-Saxons. These migrations may have introduced the earliest forms of English.
And what of the Celts we know the Irish, Scots and Welsh? Scholars have traditionally placed their origins in Iron Age Central Europe, but Oppenheimers new data clearly show that the Welsh, Irish and other Atlantic fringe peoples derive from Ice Age refuges in the Basque country and Spain.They came by an Atlantic coastal route many thousands of years ago, though the Celtic languages we know of today were brought in by later migrations, following the same route, during Neolithic times.
Stephen Oppenheimer shows us, in his meticulous analysis, that there is in truth a deep genetic line dividing the English from the rest of the British people but that, fascinatingly, the roots of that separate identity go back not 1500 years but 6,000.The real story of the British peoples is one of extraordinary continuity and enduring lineage that has survived all onslaughts.
I thought that I remembered that you had a military background. I have a military background too. But as I said in another post, it was the choice of words that got everyone upset. Calling everyone "Bush bots" doesn't help either.
It would be amusing if it weren't so pathetic. What a moron! I wish John Howard would put his pathetic butt in a row boat and set it adrift. Did I mention a row boat without oars with a hole in it? Where is that stingray when you need it? Well, maybe the box jellyfish will get him!
Uh-uh, he's dome it now.......
It's a very technical book and probably dull reading unless you're especially interested in the subject. Excellent book for the interested though.
He should go back to the hellish failed hellhole societies that muslims have created and then want to escape.
Somehow, before I get half way through of one these (always interesting & edifying) posts, I just know I'll see your name at the bottom of it.
Guess I'll have to hit Amazon before bed, as if I don't already have enough reading matterial begging for attention.
Well, that's gotta be the Indianapolis 500!
Thanks for setting me straight. But the guy's still an islamo-moron.
Agreed. It is amazing Mark, that a firm belief of the Islamists is their cultural and personal superiority over those that inhabit the countries the Islamist immigrate to.
God willing that idiot and many like him will soon be convicts and their offspring will have a convict heritage, as well.
I believe that a big part of it is to spread islam as widely as possible, in order to rule the world. The idea is to immigrate to democratic countries, until they outnumber "the natives," then vote in sharia law. Cair has said that's their plan for the US.