1 posted on
01/15/2007 8:28:23 PM PST by
zarf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: zarf
I want peace, but I trust no deal while the Assad regime is still there.
2 posted on
01/15/2007 8:30:18 PM PST by
aynrandfreak
(Who would turn out better if we split into two separate countries based on the '04 Presidential Map?)
To: zarf
bttt the backdeals surface
3 posted on
01/15/2007 8:30:30 PM PST by
txhurl
(park? they're negotiating PARKS??)
To: zarf
At the buffer zone, along Lake Kinneret, a park will be set up for joint use by Israelis and Syrians. The park will cover a significant portion of the Golan Heights. Israelis will be free to access the park and their presence will not be dependent on Syrian approval.
Sounds like a great place for paintball battles...
To: zarf
5 posted on
01/15/2007 8:31:51 PM PST by
shoebooty
To: zarf
My first reaction is pig in a poke.
There might be one outside chance, however. Maybe the Saudis persuaded Syria to throw in with the Sunni Arabs and stop messing around with Iran and the Shiite terrrorists. Maybe the Syrian regime was feeling too much pressure from all directions.
Not sure I believe that, but it's the one hopeful thing I can think of.
6 posted on
01/15/2007 8:32:34 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: zarf
Never trust your sworn enemy. Syria is NEVER going to live up to their end of the bargain.
7 posted on
01/15/2007 8:33:18 PM PST by
NRA2BFree
(May you always have love to share, health to spare, and friends that care.)
To: zarf
Sounds like it isn`t a non-paper but it might work well in the funny papers.
Doesn`t seem like the Israelis are putting any heat on the Rats over Iraq which makes no sense. Anybody know why?
8 posted on
01/15/2007 8:34:51 PM PST by
neverhillorat
(IF THE RATS WIN, WE ALL LOSE)
To: zarf
"The document is described as a non-paper".Perhaps that's why I believe that this is non-real.
9 posted on
01/15/2007 8:36:45 PM PST by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
To: zarf
When they say secret, do they mean another agreement brokered by uberschlamazel Shimon Peres?
10 posted on
01/15/2007 8:36:56 PM PST by
sully777
(You have flies in your eyes--Catch-22)
To: zarf
I really, really thought this was from Scrappleface.
11 posted on
01/15/2007 8:37:19 PM PST by
Txsleuth
(FREEPATHON TIME-Please become a monthly donor, or Dollar a Day donor.)
To: zarf
* According to the terms, Syria will also agree to end its support for Hezbollah and Hamas and will distance itself from Iran. If the Israelis believe this, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I want to talk about selling them and they can move it across the Jordan River for the invasion forces of A-rabs and rag heads to come thundering across.
12 posted on
01/15/2007 8:37:50 PM PST by
RetiredArmy
(Dimocrats stand for everything I hate, despise and wish to see destroyed, including dimocrats!)
To: Alouette; SJackson; Salem; Esther Ruth; F15Eagle; lupie
14 posted on
01/15/2007 8:39:20 PM PST by
agrace
("Kill the Jews and infidels!" = free speech; "Muslims preach violence!" = hate speech)
To: zarf
Considering how closely tied we are with the Israelis I find it hard to believe the administration would be ratcheting up the rhetoric and pressure on Syria if this was legit.
15 posted on
01/15/2007 8:39:50 PM PST by
garv
To: zarf
Except that Syria is still dedicated to the proposition of the elimination of Israel., it's a good deal.
16 posted on
01/15/2007 8:40:09 PM PST by
fat city
(What part of cognitive dissonance don't you understand?)
To: zarf
Breaking: Peace Agreement Between Israel and Syria?People that believe this, also believe in the tooth fairy.
17 posted on
01/15/2007 8:41:00 PM PST by
mosquewatch.com
(The trouble starts with an "I" and ends with a "slam".)
To: zarf
DECRIMINALIZE DRUGSZarf from your profile which drugs do you want legal?
20 posted on
01/15/2007 8:44:51 PM PST by
mosquewatch.com
(The trouble starts with an "I" and ends with a "slam".)
To: zarf
The Golan Heights are they crazy?
21 posted on
01/15/2007 8:45:52 PM PST by
Empireoftheatom48
(God bless our troops!! Our President and those who fight against the awful commie, liberal left!!)
To: zarf
"The timetable for the withdrawal remained open: Syria demanded the pullout be carried out over a five-year period, while Israel asked for the withdrawal to be spread out over 15 years."
So it will never happen.
23 posted on
01/15/2007 8:46:47 PM PST by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: zarf
Most likly worth the non paper it's written on.
To: zarf
Look at the dates, people:
"In a series of secret meetings in Europe between September 2004 and July 2006 ....... and .....
The document is described as a non-paper, a document of understandings that is not signed and lacks legal standing - its nature is political. It was prepared in August 2005 and has been updated during a number of meetings in Europe.I'd say Syria's role and actions in the events of August 2006 pretty much rendered this crock of you-know-what moot. However, it might explain some of the incomprehensible insanity of the Olmert government's actions this summer.
25 posted on
01/15/2007 8:53:12 PM PST by
tarheelswamprat
(So what if I'm not rich? So what if I'm not one of the beautiful people? At least I'm not smart...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson