Skip to comments.In need of help to a question about a proposed bill regarding Valerie Plame
Posted on 01/17/2007 2:18:46 PM PST by Mo1
This was just brought to my attention and I need help in understanding what exactly this Bill/Amendment is about.
I tried calling over to the House of Representatives .. but they said there was no one there to help explain the details of this bill/amendment.
They suggested I go to Thomas.gov .. but I already did that.
Can any FReepers out there help direct me in the right direction and find a better way to locate what this is?
Title: For the relief of Valerie Plame Wilson.
Sponsor: Rep Inslee, Jay [WA-1] (introduced 1/16/2007) Cosponsors (None) Private bill
Latest Major Action: 1/16/2007 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select).
Provides for the relief of Valerie Plame Wilson.
somebody needs to refer this to Rush, Hannity, Savage,et al
House Intelligence Committee?
I see they plan on "right all perceived wrongs," eh?
This is so she can collect her pension now??
Is that for real?
I may actually fall on the floor laughing!
here ya go, it's to give her her pension even though she's short on years.
HON. JAY INSLEE
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2007
Mr. INSLEE. Madam Speaker, I rise today to bring to the attention of Congress one of the human impacts caused by the indiscretion of government officials regarding the covert identity of Central Intelligence Agency operative Valerie Plame Wilson.
As nearly every American knows, and as most of the world has heard, the covert CIA identity of Valerie Plame Wilson was exposed to the public as part of an Administration response to a critical op-ed published in the New York Times by Mrs. Plame Wilson's husband, Joe Wilson.
The national security ramifications for this act have been discussed thoroughly on this floor, in the news media, and I am quite certain behind CIA's closed doors. Today I intend to call my colleagues' attention to the human toll that this ``outing'' has had on one, often overlooked, individual. That person is Valerie Plame Wilson.
While the media, Congress, and the judiciary have gone to great lengths to discuss the impact of this unfortunate act on politicians, bureaucrats, agents in the field, and the suspected perpetrators of the outing, few have looked at the impact that the outing has had on Mrs. Plame Wilson and her family.
On July 14, 2003, Mrs. Plame Wilson's professional life was forever altered, and her CIA career irrevocably ruined by the syndicated publication of a column, which revealed Mrs. Plame Wilson's identity as a covert CIA officer. Since this time, numerous reports on Mrs. Plame Wilson's personal history have surfaced
[Page: E119] GPO's PDFin the press, official government documents, and by government officials.
Following the initial outing in the media, Mrs. Plame Wilson's future as a covert CIA operative ceased to exist and her career of two decades was destroyed. On January 9, 2006, Mrs. Plame Wilson resigned from the CIA, recognizing that any future with the Agency would not include any work for which she had been highly trained. For these reasons, and under these distressing conditions, Mrs. Plame Wilson voluntarily resigned from the Agency.
Despite Mrs. Plame Wilson's 20 years of federal service, she does not meet the minimum age requirement to receive her retirement annuity. She has been left without a career.
I am introducing legislation to allow Mrs. Plame Wilson to qualify for her annuity, as one who has served her country for two decades, and waive the age requirement for collecting it. To best demonstrate the annuity for which Mrs. Plame Wilson may qualify if this legislation were to pass, I am submitting for the record a document sent to Mrs. Plame Wilson by the CIA. It outlines her deferred annuity and testifies to 20 years of service. The document bears no indications of classified material as required by CIA procedures, and was sent via regular postal mail after Mrs. Plame Wilson was no longer in the employ of the CIA. Legal experts have assured me that this is not a classified document.
I believe that this is one small measure to help send a message that we must stand up for public service officers, such as Mrs. Plame Wilson, who have been treated wrongly despite their loyalty and sacrifice to country. For those who have been, for all practicable purposes, pushed out of public service for reasons unrelated to performance, but instead seeded in politics, we should not turn our backs.
Central Intelligence Agency,
Washington, DC, February 10, 2006.
Mrs. VALERIE WILSON
DEAR MRS. WILSON, This letter is in response to your recent telephone conversation with regarding when you would be eligible to receive your deferred annuity. Per federal statute, employees participating under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) Special Category, who have acquired a minimum of 20 years of service, are eligible to receive their deferred annuity at their Minimum Retirement Age (MRA). Your MRA is age 56, at which time you'll be eligible to receive a deferred annuity.
Your deferred annuity will be based on the regular FERS computation rate, one percent for every year of service vice the FERS Special rate of 1.7% for every year of service. You will receive 1.7% for each year of overseas service, prorated on a monthly basis, after January 1, 1987 in the calculation of your annuity. Our records show that since January 1, 1987, you have acquired 6 years, 1 month and 29 days of overseas service.
Following is a list of your federal service:
Dates of Service: CIA, CIA (LWOP), CIA Ð(P/T 40), from 11/9/1985 to 1/9/2006--total 20 years, 7 days.
Based on the above service and your resignation on January 9, 2006, your estimated deferred annuity is $21,541.00 per year, or $1795 per month, beginning at age 56.
The above figures are estimates for your planning purposes. The Office of Personnel Management, as the final adjudicator of creditable service and annuity computations, determines final annuity amounts. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Did you try calling the office of the sponsor, Rep Inslee, Jay?
In trying to get the text, I got a notice that it takes them a couple of days to post it, and the bill was introduced on Jan. 16th, so if you can't get more info from Inslee's office, you can keep checking the site, and hopefully more info will appear.
But it certainly looks strange.
No legal fees, SS protection, or stuff like that, just her pension.
Thank you for finding that so fast
Now I need to learn that trick :0)
Well, BOO HOO. Her star-studded career as a magazine model has fallen through?
She needs to get a job, not expect to live off the taxpayers her entire life.
That is what I got out of it.
This just confirms what a nutzo world we live in... and most of them are in DC.
Looks like lots of interesting info.
So she can lie. He can lie about her lies. They can file ridiculous lawsuits.
And taxpayers are supposed to fund her pension????????
RTC (Referred To Committee) is Governmentspeak for RIP (Requiescat In Pace).
I guess the Wilson's are hard up for cash that they have to get a Congressman to pass a private bill for them
She wasn't FIRED, FGS. She quit.
She resigned from a non-covert positions and now the taxpayers are supposed to pay for her retirement? I'm officially ticked off.
Well I'll be. The Wilsons want the money now. There is no reason she can't go to work somewhere. Heck, she could be a lobbyist. Lord knows the dems owe the woman. I, on the other hand, do not owe her anything except a good smack.