Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Asteroid 2007 BB close fly-by (Moon)
NASA/JPL ^ | 1-18-07 | JPL

Posted on 01/18/2007 12:17:02 AM PST by Orlando

Asteroid 2007 BB to pass between 0.0026 au or 0.0025 au. The distance to the moon is 0.00256 au(238,855 miles). Earth is okay from any impact. Just for your information.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asteroid; astronomy; comet; magneticfield; moon; science; solarwinds; space; spaceweather; weather
0.0025 au= 232,389 miles from Earth. 0.0026 au= 241,685 miles from Earth.
1 posted on 01/18/2007 12:17:04 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Orlando

Orbit Simulation

http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/db_shm?sstr=2007%20BB


2 posted on 01/18/2007 12:20:15 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Here's more data:

http://www.hohmanntransfer.com/crt.htm#2007bb


3 posted on 01/18/2007 12:22:32 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Orlando

The asteroid appears to cross Earths orbit twice in the NASA simulation. Have any idea when that will be.

Will the asteroid be visible either day with say binoculars?


4 posted on 01/18/2007 12:30:42 AM PST by Pontiac (All are worthy of freedom, none are incapable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

New updated chart:

http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/neo_ca?type=NEA;type=NEC;type=NEC;hmax=all;tlim=recent_future;dmax=0.1AU;max_rows=200;fmt=full;action=Display%20Table;show=1&sort=date&sdir=ASC


5 posted on 01/18/2007 12:32:27 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orlando
With a diameter of 10 meters probably not going to be visible with binoculars.

Never mind.
6 posted on 01/18/2007 12:33:44 AM PST by Pontiac (All are worthy of freedom, none are incapable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

Jan 19th(Friday).
Estimated Diameter: 7.8m-18m

"Will the asteroid be visible either day with say binoculars?"

I don't know ?

This data is not yet on

http://www.spaceweather.com


7 posted on 01/18/2007 12:36:48 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Orlando
A BB asteroid?

"You'll poke yer eye out, kid!"

8 posted on 01/18/2007 12:43:09 AM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (I'm pretty sure the phrase life is too short doesn't exist in Islam-Dennis Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

LOL! That's cool


9 posted on 01/18/2007 1:09:04 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Orlando
Impact chart:

http://www.brera.mi.astro.it/sormano/teca.html

Sun, Solar Winds data:

http://www.n3kl.org

10 posted on 01/18/2007 10:47:49 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
Can a very strong solar winds effect small objects in space ?

http://www2.nict.go.jp/y/y223/simulation/realtime/

Comet McNaught Photo Gallery:

http://www.spaceweather.com/comets/gallery_mcnaught_page11.htm

Check-out Jan 17th image from Cape, South Africa.
The comet tail might be leaving behind unknown debris?
11 posted on 01/18/2007 10:57:52 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

ping


12 posted on 01/18/2007 6:55:01 PM PST by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

ping


13 posted on 01/18/2007 7:07:31 PM PST by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...

14 posted on 01/18/2007 7:09:25 PM PST by KevinDavis (Nancy you ignorant Slut!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orlando

Could it hit the moon?


15 posted on 01/18/2007 7:13:13 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orlando

Just how big is this "BB"?


16 posted on 01/18/2007 8:46:43 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It's smaller than the 98, but both have been discontinued.


17 posted on 01/18/2007 10:34:16 PM PST by SunkenCiv ("In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, they're not." -- John Rummel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

potential future Earth impact events
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/

this showed up in the Google search:

http://www.boingboing.net/2006/07/03/bigass_asteroid_whoo.html

Monday, July 3, 2006

Big-ass asteroid whooshes by Earth, too close for comfort

A very large asteroid flew a mere 270,000 miles from Earth's surface today, just a tad farther than our moon. But then 2004-XP14 read the bumper sticker on Earth's backside which read, "Get any closer and I'll fart!," so the asteroid veered off. And here we are, all of us, unsmashed -- for now.

and from a prophecies forum:

Jan. 17 #2: The discovery of 2007 BB has been announced, discovered this morning and confirmed alone by the CSS, which followed it over a span of 6.77 hours. JPL is showing that this tiny object will pass Earth at about one lunar distance on January 19th. And the MPC is indicating that it will go out of view for all ground-based telescopes around the 23rd.


18 posted on 01/18/2007 10:38:04 PM PST by SunkenCiv ("In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, they're not." -- John Rummel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

http://www.hohmanntransfer.com/h22/now.htm#K07B00B


19 posted on 01/18/2007 10:39:24 PM PST by SunkenCiv ("In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, they're not." -- John Rummel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; Brujo; CGVet58; Chani; ..
Just a teeny tiny catastrophe.

· Catastrophism ping list · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

20 posted on 01/18/2007 11:01:51 PM PST by SunkenCiv ("In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, they're not." -- John Rummel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orlando; SunkenCiv

from your link, Orlando...South Australia.

is that allah (hopefully)sending another black rock to mecca?

21 posted on 01/18/2007 11:26:16 PM PST by Fred Nerks (Read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free pdf download. Link on my bio page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: reg45
Jpl simulation have asteroid 2007 BB coming in from above and inward of Earth(The Sun side).

The current position of moon is on sun-side(New Moon )
Here's a simulation of moon phase.

http://www.astro.wisc.edu/~dolan/java/MoonPhase.html

Current Moon(GMT):

http://www.iceinspace.com.au/?moonphase
22 posted on 01/19/2007 2:32:09 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
They had that information on the JPL orbit simulation(earlier) it was under estimated diameter 7.8 m - 18 m (@ 25 feet to @ 60 feet)now data is not present.
maybe it's been moved ?

The time they have is 1525 hrs(UT?,GMT?EST?)
why do they make it hard on those of us avg joe?
23 posted on 01/19/2007 2:56:36 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I am sorry it's 10 meter?


24 posted on 01/19/2007 2:58:47 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Orlando

1525 hrs UT is 1025 hrs(EST) 10:25 am


25 posted on 01/19/2007 3:07:04 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

It's just another Russian booster rocket. :0
Damn Russians.
btw..big comet


26 posted on 01/19/2007 3:20:22 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

check out the new image from Auckland, New Zealand by Jamie Newman(WOW!!!)

http://www.spaceweather.com


27 posted on 01/19/2007 3:52:44 AM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Orlando
WOW! Too good not to post!

Even experienced astronomers have never seen anything like it--a sweeping fan of comet dust visible to the unaided eye despite city lights and twilight. Jamie Newman sends this picture from Auckland, New Zealand

28 posted on 01/19/2007 3:58:57 AM PST by Fred Nerks (Read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free pdf download. Link on my bio page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Orlando; BenLurkin
The timescale is TDB, Barycentric Dynamical Time.

TDB more or less supersedes the older astronomical time standard, ET or ephemeris time.

TDB is currently not much different than UTC (colloquially UTC = GMT) and you can think of it that way. Currently TBD leads UTC by 65.132 seconds+periodic terms, 10:25 TDB is more like 10:24 UTC.

They make it hard on those of us avg joe, I suppose, because that is not the audience they are addressing. If you know what the "heliocentric ecliptic J2000" is you probably know what TDB is. Visit astronomy.com or sky2nite.com for popularizations. (I don't mean that at all dismissively, please don't take offense.)

Visit: http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/systime.html for an authoritative, if somewhat dense, explanation of timescales.

Although the various timescales in usage seem arcane and pedantic, they serve a purpose. UT is determined by the orientation of the Earth with respect to the "fixed" stars and conventional models of precession. It is intended to make the sun transit the Greenwich meridian at noon, when corrected by the equation of time. UTC is an atomic timescale that is kept within 0.9 seconds of UT by adding or subtracting leap seconds periodically.

By the nineteenth century, sufficient accurate astronomical observations were available and reduced to indicate that the rotation of the Earth was irregular when compared to the motion of astronomical bodies. (Largely based on Simon Newcomb's reduction of the lunar occulations of stars observed by the Paris observatory in the eighteenth century.) Newcomb invented our current system of mean solar time and introduced a timescale called Ephemeris Time (ET) that was more regular and predictable than the Earth's rotation.

With the invention of atomic clocks in the 1940's time standards that were potentially more uniform than ET became available. Today the standard for time worldwide is TAI maintained by BIPM outside of Paris. TAI is determined by an ensemble of atomic clocks maintained by national standards laboratories around the world. The various standards are weighted by the inverse of their variance from ensemble average. Most of the weight is accorded to time standards kept by the U.S. Naval Observatory and NIST. (Within the United States there is some unacknowledged rivalry between these two organizations.)

TAI was approximately equal to UTC on January 1, 1958. These days, they differ by an integer number of "leap seconds", currently 33. Ephemeris time was equal to UTC sometime around 1900. Ephemeris time was replace by Terrestial Dynamical Time TDT or TT. TT leads TAI by exactly 32.184 seconds, now and forever, world without end. Amen. TT is based on atomic time measured on the sea level surface of the Earth. General Relativity theory (unlike Global Warming Theory) makes useful and verifiable predictions. One is that time progresses differently in different reference frames, with differing local gravitational field and accelerations (rotation is an acceleration). Why the motions of the celestial bodies should care about (be influenced by) variations in the local gravity field at 3450 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. is not a question physicists care to ponder. Rather, an artificial timescale based on an irrotational time standard located at the center of gravity of the solar system, but calibrated to run at the same rate as a time standard on the surface of the Earth, on average, is introduced. It differs from TT only by periodic terms, never more than about 0.002 seconds. It rejoices in the sobriquet Barycentric Dynamical Time, TDB, to his friends.

29 posted on 01/19/2007 5:36:40 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The women got the vote and the Nation got Harding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Orlando

The solar wind can move things around. A satellite orbiting the moon at low altitude would have to undergo frequent course correction to avoid letting the satellite orbit intersect the surface of the moon. Also, solar sails can get a tremendous delta v from solar wind.


30 posted on 01/19/2007 9:52:38 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Orlando

Heh... what a relief... one of the old Apollo upper stages pulled this stunt a few years back.


31 posted on 01/19/2007 10:12:33 AM PST by SunkenCiv ("In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, they're not." -- John Rummel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

That picture is great. look how bright it is even behind cloud cover. WOW !!!


32 posted on 01/19/2007 12:29:28 PM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Alot of new 2007 asteroids being found within 48 hours .


33 posted on 01/19/2007 12:36:13 PM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Orlando

Shed pieces of comets and whatnot.


34 posted on 01/19/2007 10:17:23 PM PST by SunkenCiv ("In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, they're not." -- John Rummel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks; All

Check out this image(19Jan07) from Mudgee NSW Aust.

http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=22192&d=1169214261


35 posted on 01/19/2007 10:22:04 PM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Orlando

WOW! thanks.


36 posted on 01/19/2007 10:38:51 PM PST by Fred Nerks (Read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free pdf download. Link on my bio page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson