Skip to comments.
NBC News Chief Takes Swipe at O'Reilly
Newsday.com ^
| Jan. 17.2007
| DAVID BAUDER
Posted on 01/18/2007 5:44:27 AM PST by Kimmers
PASADENA, Calif. -- Bill O'Reilly's criticism of NBC News as a liberal-leaning network is "really kind of sad and pathetic," the network's news president said on Wednesday. Steve Capus attributed the Fox News Channel host's criticism of the network to O'Reilly's ongoing feud with MSNBC's Keith Olbermann. O'Reilly has said NBC News, as an organization, has gone sharply to the left. He cited the network's decision last fall to begin referring to the sectarian violence in Iraq as a civil war, a phrase the Bush administration has resisted. He made his displeasure clear in a recent interview with NBC's Andrea Mitchell, then later talked to a body language consultant who said Mitchell looked uncomfortable. A spokeswoman for Fox News Channel declined to comment on Capus' remarks. "I think it's really kind of sad and pathetic, some of the things that he's been lobbing at us these days," Capus told reporters here. "I don't quite understand it. I assume it's because Keith Olbermann has had such tremendous growth and there's real momentum behind Keith's broadcast." O'Reilly has long been the ratings leader in cable news. But Olbermann, who has stepped up commentary criticizing President Bush in the last five months, has seen some ratings growth opposite O'Reilly. As O'Reilly has been criticizing NBC, prime-time host Joe Scarborough of MSNBC has criticized him, making O'Reilly a frequent topic on the MSNBC program. "As far as I'm concerned, he's not commenting on NBC News," Capus said. "He's just trying to do this personal feud. The more he does it, the more success we have, so he can do it any time he wants, as far as I'm concerned. And I think the audience knows exactly what's at play here."
(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: liberalism; nbc; oreilly
OK I searched from here to who done it and did not see this posted, which I found hard to believe.
1
posted on
01/18/2007 5:44:29 AM PST
by
Kimmers
To: Kimmers
Steve Capus attributed the Fox News Channel host's criticism of the network to O'Reilly's ongoing feud with MSNBC's Keith Olbermann.Havent heard O'Reilly mention Obermans name in quite a few months but I guess that doesnt matter much.
To: Kimmers
That tremendous growth KO has experienced has doubled his audience, from fifty left-wing conspiracy theorists to one hundred!
3
posted on
01/18/2007 5:47:33 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: Give therapeutic violence a chance!)
To: Kimmers
"Capus told reporters here. "I don't quite understand it. I assume it's because Keith Olbermann has had such tremendous growth and there's real momentum behind Keith's broadcast.""
I think he forgot the sarcasm tag.
To: Rummyfan
The DBM is really trying to increase KO's numbers....just think, they might have the same success they had in boosting the sales of the Ditsy Chix CDs and concert tickets. ;)
5
posted on
01/18/2007 5:49:30 AM PST
by
greyfoxx39
(Bill Clinton soiled his legacy, in retaliation the DBM is soiling President Bush's legacy.)
To: Kimmers
Sounds like O'Reilly struck a raw nerve. Capus would sell his first born to have any of his no-talent talking heads on NBC show up with O'Reilly's ratings.
Well done Bill! :)
6
posted on
01/18/2007 5:50:29 AM PST
by
mkjessup
To: Kimmers
The more he does it, the more success we have, so he can do it any time he wants, as far as I'm concerned. And I think the audience knows exactly what's at play here."This means that O'Rielly is getting under his skin, and down deep suspects BOR is right.....and would not admit it if bamboo slivers were inserted under his fingernails.
7
posted on
01/18/2007 5:50:50 AM PST
by
B.O. Plenty
(liberalism, abortions and islam are terminal)
To: Long Island Pete
Oberman has nightmares about O'Reilly, and being a libidiot, that is equivlant to O'Reilly picking on Oberman.
Therefore, it is a feud.
8
posted on
01/18/2007 5:51:36 AM PST
by
CPOSharky
(Year = 365 days. muzzy 'most holy' days = 450. Go figure.)
To: Kimmers
...
"really kind of sad and pathetic,"...NBC News (as) is a liberal-leaning network Yes it is, really sad and pathetic that O'Reilly and just about every other thinking individual is forced to that accurate conclusion.
9
posted on
01/18/2007 5:53:26 AM PST
by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
To: mkjessup
Fox and Friends jumped into the fray moments ago, echoing precisely what you said.
The fray has escaped primetime and escalated into a full blown war.
10
posted on
01/18/2007 5:55:20 AM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. .... It's spit on a lefty day.)
To: Rummyfan
To be honest with you I did not know KO so I googled him. I recognized the face and I have listened to him long enough to roll my eyes and move on to the next channel.
11
posted on
01/18/2007 5:55:59 AM PST
by
Kimmers
(It's not what you take when you leave this world behind, it's what you leave behind when you go)
To: Kimmers
What happened did Ol Bill tell the truth about NBC. Look at Imus and what he and Matthews said about Bush and Cheney. Look at the people Scarbough puts on his show. look at the fat the lovely Meridith was in war protests.hissy Crissy high fives people on election night when liberals win. look at the rally with Maxine Communist Walters against Lieberman in the primary in Conn. . Imus and MATHEWS ARE TWO OF THE WORST.Oberman spums hate every night against the president and our country. Just com pair the two with an open mind and guess who wins and it is not msnbc and it liberal clones.
To: bert
Fox and Friends jumped into the fray moments ago, echoing precisely what you said.
I need to send them my resume', I'm tired of working for free. LOL
13
posted on
01/18/2007 6:06:48 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(Ask Me About Great Conservative Morning Commentary Available For Reasonable Fees!)
To: Kimmers
I did not know KO so I googled him. I recognized the face and I have listened to him long enough to roll my eyes and move on to the next channel
KO is basically Howard Beale with only 5 percent of the gravitas.
14
posted on
01/18/2007 6:09:41 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(Ask Me About Great Conservative Morning Commentary Available For Reasonable Fees!)
To: driftdiver
That comment on Olbermann's increased ratings gave me a great belly laugh to start the day, and I don't even like O'Reilly very much! HA!
15
posted on
01/18/2007 6:11:41 AM PST
by
Miss Marple
(Prayers for Jemian's son,: Lord, please keep him safe and bring him home .)
To: Kimmers
O'Reilly is like Walmart to the libs. They hate anybody who works for and achieves the American Dream.
16
posted on
01/18/2007 6:16:03 AM PST
by
msnimje
(You simply cannot be Christian and Pro-Abortion.)
To: Kimmers
I am always amused when you call a liberal (or in this case a left-leaning liberal organization) by their true type - liberal -- and they get upset.
I think the noise from the NBC news chief is along the lines of any type of publicity is good publicity even if it makes NBC and its news group look bad. He only mentions Olberman because he needs much more publicity given his absolutely bottom of the listings ratings. They are jealous of the Fox News Channel success especially the shows such as O'Reilly Factor and Hannity and Colmes.
17
posted on
01/18/2007 6:17:26 AM PST
by
kevinm13
(The Main Stream Media is dead! Fox News Channel and Freerepublic Rocks!)
To: msnimje
18
posted on
01/18/2007 6:20:53 AM PST
by
Kimmers
(It's not what you take when you leave this world behind, it's what you leave behind when you go)
To: kevinm13
19
posted on
01/18/2007 6:21:33 AM PST
by
Kirkwood
To: kevinm13
The comparisons of NBC and the imaginary 'UBS' of the 1976 movie 'Network' are too eerie:
"Nelson Chaney": All I know is that this violates every canon of respectable broadcasting.
"Frank Hackett": We're not a respectable network. We're a whorehouse network, and we have to take whatever we can get.
I can well imagine that conversation taking place at NBC, and especially at CBS just before they signed Katie Couric!
20
posted on
01/18/2007 6:23:16 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(Ask Me About Great Conservative Morning Commentary Available For Reasonable Fees!)
To: Kimmers
"Capus told reporters here. "I don't quite understand it. I assume it's because Keith Olbermann has had such tremendous growth and there's real momentum behind Keith's broadcast.""BWAHAHAHAH....lol...did he really say that? Sportscenter Guy is an established failure in the TV news community. "The Big Show" on MSNBC - HAHAHAHA - failure. "The Keith Olbermann Evening News" on Fox Sports Net - LOL - failure. "Speaking of Sports" and "Speaking of Everything" on ABC radio - failure.
Sorry, your current show shall pass, as well.
To: Kimmers
"I think the audience knows exactly what's at play here."It certainly does, and for MSNBC, there is no audience.
To: Long Island Pete
Heard BOR on Ingraham a few months back. KO's picking on him to get publicity. Ergo, BOR ignores him.
"Feud? What feud? Who's this KO that NBC types keep talking about?"
To: Calvin Locke
That would be Keith Overbite on Countdown to No Ratings
To: driftdiver
Well, when your audience goes from a dozen to a baker's dozen, that's pretty substantial growth in cable, percentage-wise.
Especially at pMSNBC.
To: Kimmers
Well you know, I started reading up on some of the quotes of my fixation of the day ('Network' - 1976) and I am amazed at how fiction 30 years ago has become reality today.
In the movie, Faye Dunaway plays 'Diana Christensen' who is given a dressing down by 'Max Schumacher' (played by the late William Holden), check this dialogue out:
"It's too late, Diana. There's nothing left in you that I can live with. You're one of Howard's humanoids. If I stay with you, I'll be destroyed. Like Howard Beale was destroyed. Like Laureen Hobbs was destroyed. Like everything you and the institution of television touch is destroyed. You're television incarnate, Diana, indifferent to suffering; insensitive to joy. All of life is reduced to the common rubble of banality. War, murder, death are all the same to you as bottles of beer. And the daily business of life is a corrupt comedy. You even shatter the sensations of time and space into split seconds and instant replays. You're madness, Diana. Virulent madness. And everything you touch dies with you."
How about that? ;)
26
posted on
01/18/2007 6:32:23 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(Ask Me About Great Conservative Morning Commentary Available For Reasonable Fees!)
To: Kimmers
" I assume it's because Keith Olbermann has had such tremendous growth..."
Apparently, Keith has started taking the blue pill.
27
posted on
01/18/2007 6:34:37 AM PST
by
JZelle
To: Kimmers
I'm sick of reading about reporters like they are part of the story. Yesterday I read how Katie Courie thinks there should be quota's for major network anchor woman. Sometimes I watch Obermann on MSNBC to get a different perspective but I usually click away in 10 minutes and usually at the end of an anti-FOX tirade. It's "sad and pathetic" the president of NBC news believes he's calling it down the middle.
28
posted on
01/18/2007 6:35:46 AM PST
by
jackieaxe
(Unsourced reporting is not reporting but a lie or a manipulation)
To: mkjessup
To justify his salary, Olberman has to water the plants, pick up, and empty the waste baskets every night before he leaves the studio.
29
posted on
01/18/2007 6:35:47 AM PST
by
Maumee
To: Kimmers
They should be proud of being outed as liberals. What is it that is so bad about being who you are? Isn't that what the libs say about others? This is another Rosie-Donald bs moment.
30
posted on
01/18/2007 6:36:24 AM PST
by
indylindy
(Liberals love crisis, create crisis and then dwell on them.)
To: Kimmers
Olberman and O'Reilly
Goofy and goofier.
To: Kimmers
"I don't quite understand it. I assume it's because Keith Olbermann has had such tremendous growth and there's real momentum behind Keith's broadcast." Why didn't Keith get his big raise then?
O'Reilly has long been the ratings leader in cable news. But Olbermann, who has stepped up commentary criticizing President Bush in the last five months, has seen some ratings growth opposite O'Reilly.
Why five months? Where did that number come from? What big news happened five months ago, in mid-August? Someone who's that precise, in this instance, would have bias against O'Reilly anyway.
32
posted on
01/18/2007 6:45:47 AM PST
by
jdm
To: Rummyfan
"from fifty left-wing conspiracy theorists to one hundred"
Sounds like my local paper telling "merely the truth" -St. Pete Slimes
33
posted on
01/18/2007 6:45:53 AM PST
by
litehaus
(A memory tooooo long)
To: greyfoxx39
And Air America listenership!
34
posted on
01/18/2007 10:26:28 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: Give therapeutic violence a chance!)
To: mkjessup
Too long for a tagline, but it sure would be a good one!
35
posted on
01/18/2007 12:54:43 PM PST
by
greyfoxx39
(Bill Clinton soiled his legacy, in retaliation the DBM is soiling President Bush's legacy.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson