Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eastforker
No, most satellites are stationary and do not circle the earth

Even if they are over the equator (as stationary satellites need to be) how will you protect them so far from US territory?

18 posted on 01/19/2007 6:45:17 AM PST by A. Pole (Orwell:He who controls the present, controls the past.He who controls the past, controls the future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


http://en.rian.ru/russia/20070119/59365283.html

MOSCOW, January 19 (RIA Novosti) - The Russian defense minister denied Friday allegations that China launched a ballistic missile January 11 that destroyed a satellite.

CNN, a U.S.-based global television network, earlier said that a U.S. National Security Council spokesman confirmed a report in the magazine American Aviation Week and Space Technology that China last week destroyed one of its old meteorological satellites with a medium-range ballistic missile.

"I have heard such rather unsubstantiated reports, and I am afraid they are unfounded," Sergei Ivanov said. "There is nothing to comment on. The rumors are largely exaggerated."

However, Japan, Australia and the United States have already expressed concern over the alleged weapons test and the theoretical possibility that China could shoot down satellites operated by other countries.

China has yet to confirm the destruction of its satellite, but is likely to face stern criticism for an attempt to spread an arms race into space.

Ivanov, who is also deputy prime minister, said Russia has always opposed the militarization of space and will continue to do so.


19 posted on 01/19/2007 6:55:05 AM PST by Rio (builder of satellites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: A. Pole

"Even if they are over the equator (as stationary satellites need to be) how will you protect them so far from US territory?"

That is "line of sight" thinking as though you are defending it with a fence or a gun. A machine in space will not see it like that. You see the other way to look at it is how could China protect their satellites when they are anywhere but over their country?

When taken in a 3D perspective I would suppose that the area where our satellite is not visible is actually no where.


31 posted on 01/19/2007 6:32:06 PM PST by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson