Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WEATHER CHANNEL ABSURDITY
Neal Nuze ^ | 01/18/07 | Neal Boortz

Posted on 01/19/2007 8:09:00 AM PST by NotchJohnson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: NotchJohnson

In southern New Mexico we don't have any reason to watch a weather channel so we don't get involved in really controversial and important situations like this. We just look outside and we can see the weather if there is any - even miles away. Cuts down on the "situations" we have to deal with.


41 posted on 01/19/2007 9:39:25 AM PST by twonie (Just because there are fewer of us don't mean we are wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotchJohnson
So the word now is "climate change."

The leftist agenda is now to claim that every uncomfortable instance of weather is the fault of the opposition.

Somebody needs to quickly spell out and publish what this form of thought control means. Crichton's "State of Fear" was a start.

42 posted on 01/19/2007 9:39:43 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

For $5.00 a year the site is ad free. I have been a member for a couple of years.


43 posted on 01/19/2007 9:42:14 AM PST by SeeRushToldU_So ( Go Braves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 7thson
Well, they gotta do something when they are forced inside because of climate changes.

44 posted on 01/19/2007 9:44:37 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
'climate change' is the most accurate way to describe what is occurring. The climate is in a state of change...I don't think anyone denies that. The question is...is it natural or man made? All the data I see points to a majority is from natural variability.
45 posted on 01/19/2007 9:47:38 AM PST by halo66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: weegee

bttt


46 posted on 01/19/2007 9:54:29 AM PST by Matchett-PI (To have no voice in the Party that always sides with America's enemies is a badge of honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: halo66

The measure of "climate change" depends entirely on the quality and timespan over which observations are made. It's easy to make assertions about climate that are unfounded simply because we have no reasonable record of the past, or because we are extrapolating with large errors that get larger with the extrapolation (into the past or present).


47 posted on 01/19/2007 9:55:45 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

(into the past or present future).
48 posted on 01/19/2007 9:58:27 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Skywarner

The biggest flaw in global warming is that everyone who is a proponent of this is assuming that these pollutants are inert and that nothing happens to them chemically to break them down. They couldn't be more wrong.


49 posted on 01/19/2007 9:59:47 AM PST by DarthVader (Conservatives aren't always right , but Liberals are almost always wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

IMO volcanic eruptions have been the major cause of chemical-agent induced change in (at least) the last million years: ash and sulpheric compounds.


50 posted on 01/19/2007 10:04:30 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: roostercashews

Watching last night, there was a special on "climate change" and they were taking multiple core samples of Arctic ice from up to a mile deep. The core samples told them that there have been 8 different "ice ages" dating back however far, each followed by warming trends. Then they went back to the "man causing catostrophic climate change" spiel...

I flipped to the channel for only a moment to catch that, maybe I missed something, but I don't get it...


51 posted on 01/19/2007 10:09:32 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras

For all we know, man's activity could be moderating the climate from what it might have been.


52 posted on 01/19/2007 11:01:38 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: NotchJohnson
Does she just read the weather or does she have some degree from somewhere?

Rush played a clip of her speaking. She is referred to as "Dr.," and calls herself a "scientist."

Since no scientist would ever call to end inquiry on any topic, for obvious reasons, she has just failed her qualifying exams and should have her degree revoked. She is no scientist.

53 posted on 01/19/2007 11:20:04 AM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotchJohnson

Weather Channel Headline:
HEIDI CULL DECLARES GORE'S GLOBAL FLATULENCE IS A FACT!


54 posted on 02/05/2007 12:34:57 PM PST by rusureitflies? (OSAMA BIN LADEN IS DEAD! There, I said it. Prove me wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson