Skip to comments."I'm In" (Hillary announces for president)
Posted on 01/20/2007 6:40:14 AM PST by tlb
click here to read article
this should be an awesome ride
nothing inspires us VWRC folks like the Clintons
let the games begin!!!!!!!!!
Many seem to think PIAPS is a shoe-in for the nomination and the presidency. I believe that when she starts receiving the exposure that all presidential candidates receive she will reveal herself as not being especially bright and pretty much at a loss when she is outside of her scripted, managed environment.
I don't think she is intellegent and is ripe for a "Howard Dean" moment. Wait until FReepers and bloggers start screaming for some of her earlier university writings to be released to the public.
Let the fun begin.
Oh Gee ... Yet ANOTHER
talking screaching tour
Well, knock me over with a 2x4.
Nothing like a Hillary thread to bring everyone out of the woods,(or cactus as is my case).
"I'm in." Something her hubby said to more women than his own.
i truly do not believe that the MSM cares about these indiscretions. The MSM will never go after her. And the public is too complacent and forgiving.
I believe she has a very good chance of winning. The media will love the idea of having at least two (liberal) women on the podium.
The focus on scandals has always helped the Clintons, not hurt them. They've been inoculated from scandal for almost two decades.
Hillary is an unattractive candidate here, today, now...and that's where our hope must lie. On the plus side is that she is on the extreme end of a number of issues (taxes, labor, health care, defense). It will take work to overcome her celebrity...the most important factor in politics today...but her unique unattractiveness might help since she's always been very "handled" and limited her open exposure to the public. She can't do that in a Presidential run, her personality will have to be out there for everyone to see -- her opponents will force that out of her. So, her unattractiveness may yet doom her.
But for God's sake, stay away from the scandal stuff -- that only makes her a victim and elicits sympathy from the public at large. In fact, I expect her to bring up the scandal-mongering even if her opponents don't...she needs it desperately, because without being a victim of crazy, nasty people, she has a much tougher road convincing the voters that she's a sympathetic figure unfairly maligned by evil nasties.
She doesn't have to answer tough questions because the media falls down in front of her and licks clean the pathway in front of her. They remind me of submissive dogs who roll over on their backs and p## into the air to prove just how submissive they are.
FRiends, enemies, or both?
The Hildabeast does that...
smooches .. thanks Nully!
Yeah, and I suspect not all of her FBI files are of fellow government employees, if ya get my drift...
I'm thinking we should *ahem" use her website's "Send a message of support" feature...alot.
Course, your name WILL be added to the expanding list of 900 in the FBI files...
I'm not sure who I fear more as president, her or Osama Obama. I think HE is a closet Muslim and SHE is the anti-christ.
The absolute worse NIGHTMARE is for one of them to be President and the other to be VP. I would have to just go hide in a cave for 4 years if that happened.
Is there a smooches line forming behind Nully??
The only serious contenders so far are Edwards & Obama (maybe Tom Vilsack) who are hoping to at least make it to VP choice if not top pick .. the others are just fluff & noise .. the more candidates on the stage, the easier for her to hide the direct questionings .. plus those like Dodd are so far left they make Hellary look center
If she's allowed to speak in general terms then it's to her advantage but if anyone can force her to speak in specifics then she'll not do as well
Hellary will only speak in general terms .. she does not have the BS'er gift that Bill has
Whenever she goes off cue and truly speaks her thoughts .. that is when she gets into trouble .. that and when she is unable to control her temper
There's always smooches for you horsie .. how ya doing?
"She can't and never has answered any tough questions only soft balls (and not Bill's, the crooked)."
Who is going to ask the Tough questions? The Media? Her competition?
Nope. She gets a pass.
But algor did in 2000, and he still lost, didn't he?
They tried to steal votes in Ohio in 2004, but jfcarry still lost, didn't he?
Stolen votes don't always translate into a win.
Its a work day in the desert, but it has finally warmed up a little. It has been colder than Hillary's heart down here.
The only press conference I ever remember her having was her Pretty in Pink one, the day Nixon died.
They did everything possible to create conditions favorable to her. We (and the press) had little idea then how bad she really was.
That she's done everything possible in the past 13 years to avoid a repeat says to me that they are still scared of such a scenario. And we all know so much more of her evilness...
Using a whiffle bat with Greta on Capitol Hill is one thing. Facing the press at little stops across the country day and night, will be different. I'm actually getting hopeful that she won't be able to weather 2 years' worth of campaigning...
Now, if we can survive witnessing her 2 year campaign is another concern! LOL ;-)
If that was/is the case.....The Rapist would have never become POTUS.
Nor would have algore come so close.....
Drive-by media exposure is metered like a f-stop on a camera.....We get what they want us to see.....
I think you nailed it here. And the 'perception' of a credible challenge puts more $$$ in the kitty for all of them.
If Hillary decides to go for the nomination, she'll get it. And if she gets the nomination she'll win, because they've got exactly the right people in the right places to cooks the precise number of votes that they need.
But watching the circus will be fascinating to watch before they finish dismantling our republic...
I just had a horrible thought...
The entire Democrat Nomination process will boil down to just one thing....
(Who Would Oprah Do)!!!!!!
I live in upstate NY, I do NOT underestimate her. And don't underestimate the inane women who WILL support her. Teachers....they go gaga over her. Women with a master's degree. rme
See the link below. It will give you some idea to the daily FR traffic.
Don't underestimate the craftiness of evil. She'll lose in the (eternal) end, but don't be surprised if in the here and now the dominatrix will rule the day.
That's your take...the Rapist as POTUS is the main reason PIAPS will not get a free pass this time...plus, the alternative media is a heck of a lot better organized this time than in the dark days when goofy bill was elected.
Do you mean this one? :0)
The only phrase that comes to mind is: "Hillary" you ignorant slut!
I believe that when she starts receiving the exposure that all presidential candidates receive she will reveal herself as not being especially bright and pretty much at a loss when she is outside of her scripted, managed environment.
And that is what I replied to...
P.S. I will bet you right here and now....Hillary will get more free passes, than the Rapist ever did. Which were too many to count. Wanna bet?
This is like a disaster that everyone long knew was coming, but is still overwhelming in its awfulness.
She is going to torture the country until she gets what she wants...MORE POWER! Be afraid, very afraid. She will do anything to become President. Anything!
Other than marrying Bill, what qualifies this creature to be President?
Her strategy: "I'm Hillary, the smartest woman in the world. Vote for me. You owe it to me."
This stuff angers me as well. The only thing Hillary can bring to America is despair and destruction. And the only way they can look the Bushes' in the eye is because both Clintons are souless hypocrites.
The loons on the left will vote for her
It's the Independent Voters that she needs to vote for her OR stay home OR vote 3rd party
Think 1992 Election and yes .. she can very will win the election
DO NOT under estimate this women"
I think you have nailed it. In addition, could someone on this thread name any candidate in either party that can beat her? I've always believed (sadly) that if she runs she will be nominated and will also win the election (again sadly).
The GOP was largely useless until Ronald Reagan came along. His leadership and victories were not due to the GOP finally getting smart or getting a backbone, but were due to his own courage, character, and personal appeal. There is no new "Reagan" on the horizon, but we just need to make sure we nominate someone who exhibits enough conviction, character, sincerity, and backbone to nail Her Fraudness to the wall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.