Malkin ping!
Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Michelle Malkin ping list...
Posted on 01/24/2007 3:54:14 AM PST by beyond the sea
Seems he purposly takes positions he knows go against those who put him in his position.
Or is he that out of touch?
psssst.......Tancredo
This is the 2nd time I've posted this in this thread now but they all want to conveniently ignore it. FENCE SIGNED INTO LAW BY PRESIDENT BUSH. TUESDAY JANUARY 9th 2007
We have immigration laws on the books that are not enforced now. And take a look at this statement from the incoming Democratic chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss.:
"When it comes to border security and immigration, Thompson said he hopes to "re-visit" legislation that gives Homeland Security authority to put new fencing and barriers along the Mexican border. He said the new Congress could "perhaps do away" with the legislation or seek more virtual, rather than physical, fencing through technology, such as sensors and cameras/"
Wed Jan 17, 2007
WASHINGTON - Mayors of Texas border towns who met with Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff on Wednesday said they are confident a 850-mile fence will not be built on the U.S.-Mexico border
Laredo Mayor Raul Salinas said it is "highly unlikely" that the fence, as authorized in a law signed by President Bush, would be funded.
It's a turnaround here. It's the beginning of a new day to say no wall," Salinas said.
Seven mayors and three Texas businessmen met with Chertoff at the office of Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (news, bio, voting record), R-Texas. She voted for the fence but wants it adjusted to address local concerns.
Chertoff said after the meeting that there are parts of the border where a fence will work and the agency wants to be "expeditious" in building it. But he said that on some parts of the border a mix of technology will be needed.
"In all cases, we need more boots on the ground," Chertoff said. Bush signed the law last year and the Republican-controlled Congress provided money to start work on the fence. But Republicans worry that now they have their majority on Capitol Hill, they never will see the fence built. Democrats in charge today generally oppose the fence.
Based on the comments of some Democrats, there is no rush.
Rep. Bennie Thompson, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, said he wants the Bush administration to offer a plan for securing the northern and southern borders.
"My preference is to delay the construction of a fence until we have a plan," said Thompson, D-Miss.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said this week Democrats want "the best possible way" to secure the border.
Hoyer voted against the fence last year, as did House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.
Though the total fencing was believed to be about 700 miles, congressional researchers say it is closer to about 850 miles.
A separate law on Homeland Security Department spending provided $1.2 billion for the fencing. That law also withholds $950 million of the sum until the House and Senate appropriations committees approve the department's plan for spending the money.
Aides to the chairmen of the House and Senate appropriations committees declined immediate comment on whether the lawmakers would approve that spending plan or whether they wanted the fence built.
Some Republicans have written Bush asking him to request more money for the fence's construction in his 2008 budget.
In a recent news conference, GOP Reps. Duncan Hunter of California and Steve King of New York said the cost of the fence would be in line with the Congressional Budget Office's estimate: $3 million a mile, for a total of $2.6 billion.
"It's just a fence. It's the kind of fence we build in America every day," Hunter said.
In a Dec. 12 report, the Congressional Research Service said costs could be higher.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers estimated a double-layer fence would cost a little over $1 million a mile, not including buying the land on which it would be built, the research service said. In addition, maintenance could run from $16.4 million to $70 million a mile over 25 years, the Corps said.
The Homeland Security Department has contracted with Boeing for the Secure Border Initiative, consisting of a "virtual fence" of cameras, surveillance technology and new procedures for border agents. The first phase is to be completed in Arizona in June. A recent audit report said that project could cost between $8 billion and $30 billion.
The way social security and SSI is run is a joke, I think the backlog, government employees dragging their feet and the administrative judges for SSI are an even bigger joke. But if you're an illegal you get to the front of the line.
Oh yes, he signed it all right...in fact, they even mentioned on Fox News today that work had begun TODAY on the new fence to keep illegal immigrants out. In truth what they've started doing is putting posts in the ground to keep vehicles from crossing the border, which typically keeps drug smuggling vehicles from crossing. Hooray for the effort, it does exactly as it is intended....which is NOTHING to prevent illegal immigration.
EFFECTIVELY SECURE THE BORDER, NOW.
Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Michelle Malkin ping list...
Some people hate President Bush for their own reasons. This issue is not worth dividing the Party.
Pray for W and Our Troops
The death-knell of the republic had rung as soon as the active power became lodged in the hands of those who sought, not to do justice to all citizens, rich and poor alike, but to stand for one special class and for its interests as opposed to the interests of others.
Theodore Roosevelt, Labor Day speech at Syracuse, NY, Sept 7, 1903
Yep, and when those very same developers get squeezed by illegals who own such companies, then you will hear them wailing.
Think it isn't happening? - a business card from Port St. Lucie, Florida
100% genuine, 100% illegal.
Teddy R. ........... foreshadowing!!!
;-)
Sure, why not? After that we can annex Iraq and solve that problem, as well.
Hey, why not just declare everybody in the World a citizen of America, abolish the borders, and viola!
Problem solved.
That is the game plan. One World Government comes knocking on our door.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.