Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hubble’s best camera suffers fresh trouble
MSNBC ^ | 01/29/2007 | Tariq Malik

Posted on 01/29/2007 1:10:46 PM PST by Sleeping Freeper

The Hubble Space Telescope is once more having trouble with its primary camera, NASA officials said Monday.

Problems related to Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys apparently sent the space telescope into safe mode over the weekend, according to reports from NASA officials and the Space Telescope Science Institute, which operates the observatory for NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center.

The telescope has since been recovered from safe mode and an investigation is under way, NASA said. Hubble should resume science activities with its remaining instruments later this week, the agency said.

“It is too early to know what influences the ACS anomaly may have on Hubble Space Telescope Servicing Mission-4 planning,” Preston Burch, associate director and program manager for the Hubble Space Telescope, said in the statement. "It is important that the review board conduct a thorough investigation that will allow us to determine if there are any changes needed in the new instruments that will be installed on the upcoming servicing mission so that we can be sure of maximizing the telescope's scientific output."

A teleconference on the latest glitch was set for 3 p.m. ET Monday.

Launched in 1990, the Hubble Space Telescope has been billed by NASA and scientists alike as one of the most valuable astronomical instruments of all time.

In 2006, Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys shut down twice, first in June then again in September, though both glitches were later resolved.

In October, NASA agreed to launch one last space shuttle servicing mission to Hubble – the telescope’s fifth orbital overhaul – to perform much needed maintenance and add new instruments. That final servicing mission is set to fly in 2008.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: missilenotmissle
Probably hit some of that Chinese satellite "space junk" from the missle test a couple of weeks ago.
1 posted on 01/29/2007 1:10:49 PM PST by Sleeping Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Freeper

BSOD .. lol


2 posted on 01/29/2007 1:11:29 PM PST by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty; xsmommy; Gabz; patton; NicknamedBob; Sleeping Freeper

Shutdown into "Safe Mode" eh?

Just needed a reboot from the blue screen of death.


3 posted on 01/29/2007 1:13:01 PM PST by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Damn, we lost Barbaro today too, Hang in there, Hubble!

Coincidence that Microsoft launched Windows Vista today?


5 posted on 01/29/2007 1:16:05 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Freeper

Shuttle will do one more repair mission is the good news for Hubble.


6 posted on 01/29/2007 1:17:14 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Vista n look out


7 posted on 01/29/2007 1:20:41 PM PST by null and void (<----- Shocked and odd...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Abort, Retry, Ignore?


8 posted on 01/29/2007 1:21:17 PM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Freeper

They have the engineering blueprints. they know where they made the mistakes last time. The Hubble has been a huge success.

Why not build another, or three more? Seems like a no brainer to me.


9 posted on 01/29/2007 1:22:51 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Freeper

Hitting Control-Alt-Delete is a bitch when wearing space gloves.

10 posted on 01/29/2007 1:24:30 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Samoans: The (low) wage slaves in the Pelosi-Starkist complex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Freeper

Hubble Haiku

The Hubble's trouble.
Engineer rubs his stubble.
An idea to fix it.


11 posted on 01/29/2007 1:25:21 PM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

I think they have a early to mid 2008 Hubble refurb mission, last one scheduled in perpetuity in all likelihood,, may as well maximize its capabilities as much and for as long as possible...


12 posted on 01/29/2007 1:26:27 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: patton; Robert A. Cook, PE
Abort, Retry, Ignore?

You must have a really old version. Didn't that get changed to

Abort, Retry, Ignore? Fail?

13 posted on 01/29/2007 1:28:38 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

LOL. Giving away my age, here.


14 posted on 01/29/2007 1:31:58 PM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

15 posted on 01/29/2007 1:32:49 PM PST by Smogger (It's the WOT Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: finnman69; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; CholeraJoe; sionnsar; patton; NicknamedBob; theDentist; ...
Technically, and theoretically, the Hubble is merely a CIA-designed spy satellite turned outwards from earth towards the heavens, and run by NASA>

Company's (unstated) goal was to use the Hubble to "buy" the very, very expensive furnaces and vacuum rooms for the Hubble fabrication, then use those rooms for their CIA/NSA spy satellites.

but they screwed up the Hubble's calibration and testing/grinding control setup -> My opinion is that they tried to use "cheaper" non-classified/non-experienced/ workers for the Hubble -> and screwed up the mirror.

Rest of Hubble's problems - fixed with the long mission several years ago - were not specifically due to grinding/testing/test calibration errors, but were un-related screw ups.
16 posted on 01/29/2007 1:47:04 PM PST by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

To Ignore problem, hit "Any Key."

To Correct the problem, hit "Any Other Key."


17 posted on 01/29/2007 2:35:12 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (The Clintons: A Malignant Malfeasance of the Most Morbid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
but they screwed up the Hubble's calibration and testing/grinding control setup -> My opinion is that they tried to use "cheaper" non-classified/non-experienced/ workers for the Hubble -> and screwed up the mirror.

You're close. My guess is they ground Hubble's mirror to the same specifications as they did for all Keyhole mirrors. Only problem is, Keyhole mirrors are ground to focus on the Earth about 250 miles away, while Hubble was supposed to focus at infinity.

18 posted on 01/29/2007 2:41:09 PM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Space Ping


19 posted on 01/29/2007 2:42:05 PM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Freeper
Problems from China's inertia anti-satellite test?
20 posted on 01/29/2007 2:56:46 PM PST by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE; finnman69; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; CholeraJoe; sionnsar; patton; ...

I wonder how much it would cost to put up a Keck style telescope, (other than an astronomical amount, I mean.)

And I wonder just how far they can stretch the synthetic aperture of it.

Assuming you didn't have to service it every few years, where would you put your telescope?


21 posted on 01/29/2007 3:01:25 PM PST by NicknamedBob (Sign says, "No dogs allowed -- except seeing-eye dogs" Why don't they put that sign down lower?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

It's time we let Hubble die and focus on the next generation observatories.


22 posted on 01/29/2007 3:06:17 PM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: saganite

What next gen?


23 posted on 01/29/2007 3:07:32 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

Optical? I would either use L5 or the lunar surface.


24 posted on 01/29/2007 3:08:14 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

To the moon, Alice...


25 posted on 01/29/2007 3:19:02 PM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Yep.


26 posted on 01/29/2007 3:19:25 PM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

If I'm not mistaken this project (below) has already been delayed. You're in a much better position than I am to say so correct me if I'm wrong. There are other observatories on the back burner because NASA is underfunded for the President's mandate for the Moon/Mars missions we both know won't happen. You also know how I feel about the waste of money on manned spaceflight as opposed to robotic missions. Wasting more money keeping Hubble limping along isn't the answer.



The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is a large, infrared-optimized space telescope, scheduled for launch in 2013. JWST will find the first galaxies that formed in the early Universe, connecting the Big Bang to our own Milky Way Galaxy. JWST will peer through dusty clouds to see stars forming planetary systems, connecting the Milky Way to our own Solar System. JWST's instruments will be designed to work primarily in the infrared range of the electromagnetic spectrum, with some capability in the visible range.

JWST will have a large mirror, 6.5 meters (21.3 feet) in diameter and a sunshield the size of a tennis court. Both the mirror and sunshade won't fit onto the rocket fully open, so both will fold up and open only once JWST is in outer space. JWST will reside in an orbit about 1.5 million km (1 million miles) from the Earth.

The James Webb Space Telescope was named after a former NASA Administrator


27 posted on 01/29/2007 3:27:44 PM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Freeper

If they can keep it warm until next year, Hubble will be fine for a while. That repair mission is going to be widely watched around the world...


28 posted on 01/29/2007 3:51:52 PM PST by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Depending on how the election in 08 goes, it may all die and no next generation.


29 posted on 01/29/2007 3:53:14 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: saganite

As I understand it, the servicing mission was planned some time ago, and was only put in question do to the shuttle observing new safety precautions. So I do not view a final servicing mission as going above and beyond trying to save a dated asset. Rather as a final extension of a unique asset that has no replacemnt on orbit now or in the near future. I am no Hubble hugger. But if we have the tools and the will, I believe the replacement hardware stand ready and safety issues covered, I see this as all together appropriate to do. Certainly the astronauts strongly wish to do this mission.


30 posted on 01/29/2007 3:54:57 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Freeper
"...has been billed by NASA and scientists alike as..."

Those aren't exactly mutually exclusive groups.
31 posted on 01/29/2007 4:01:17 PM PST by Flightdeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
You're close. My guess is they ground Hubble's mirror to the same specifications as they did for all Keyhole mirrors. Only problem is, Keyhole mirrors are ground to focus on the Earth about 250 miles away, while Hubble was supposed to focus at infinity.

I'm pretty sure that kind of error wouldn't squeak past even government workers.
32 posted on 01/29/2007 4:03:22 PM PST by Flightdeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: patton; Robert A. Cook, PE; finnman69; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; CholeraJoe; sionnsar
"To the moon, Alice..."

There are advantages to being in space somewhere as well. Among other things, one can point in almost any direction when one wants to.

That can be useful for catching such things as someone dropping a string of pearls.

I like the moon location too. I see an advantage there, too. If it were possible to manufacture the primary mirror there, then it wouldn't have to be transported. It would be a challenge, of course, but it could be made very, very, large.

33 posted on 01/29/2007 5:08:31 PM PST by NicknamedBob (Sign says, "No dogs allowed -- except seeing-eye dogs" Why don't they put that sign down lower?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Certainly the astronauts strongly wish to do this mission.


Astronauts strongly wish to do any mission that might further the notion they serve a useful purpose.


34 posted on 01/29/2007 6:06:58 PM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
Government workers didn't build the Hubble. The company Perkin-Elmer did.
35 posted on 01/29/2007 6:25:38 PM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: saganite; Names Ash Housewares
"Astronauts strongly wish to do any mission that might further the notion they serve a useful purpose."

Don't we all?

36 posted on 01/29/2007 7:02:17 PM PST by NicknamedBob (Sign says, "No dogs allowed -- except seeing-eye dogs" Why don't they put that sign down lower?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: saganite
I've seen many dozens of known, and probably hundreds of unknown, missions that have been SAVED by astronauts being able to respond to accidents or emergencies or failures that are catastrophic for mere robots.

For one, Apollo 11 almost landed (by autopilot) in a rubble field that would have tripped it over. Armstrong simply saw it, overrode the program, and flew over the boulders. A few weeks ago, they fixed the Shuttle.

Most Mariner missions, most Venus missions, many long space missions have been short-termed or lost capabilities or have failed when simple problems couldn't be fixed.
37 posted on 01/29/2007 7:43:14 PM PST by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

!


38 posted on 01/29/2007 7:45:48 PM PST by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: saganite

I am eagerly anticipating the Webb. However, the Webb is an IR scope whereas the Hubble is visible and UV. They are complimentary as apposed to being redundant.

Hubble is important and is not being replaced.


39 posted on 01/30/2007 12:22:45 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Hubble has new trouble as I'm sure you're aware and NASA has said there will be no attempt to fix the main camera which went into safe mode Saturday. Meanwhile, this will mark the 5th Orbiter mission dedicated to Hubble repair. At more than a billion a pop it seems to me the Hubble could have been replaced with newer and better observatories for the cost of keeping it alive, especially when you consider that the Hubble's original design parameters were dictated by NASA's desire to launch it from the Shuttle.

Every article I read about the Webb observatory calls it the successor to Hubble including NASA press releases. I guess they think more knowledge can be gained from concentrating our search in the infra red than launching another "Hubble" scope.

In any case, there are several smaller projects with costs in the 300 to 500 million range languishing at NASA due to the costs associated with the Shuttle, the ISS and the president's moon/mars program. I think we would both agree the better science would come from those programs as opposed to continual funding of those 2 white elephants, the Shuttle and the ISS.


40 posted on 01/30/2007 4:12:19 AM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

"Government workers didn't build the Hubble. The company Perkin-Elmer did."

I'd be shocked if after building the most expensive mirror in history, they looked at it and said "Whoops, we were supposed to have a focal length of infinity, but it is actually 250 miles!"


41 posted on 01/31/2007 5:32:45 AM PST by Flightdeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sax
The Hubble's trouble. Engineer rubs his stubble. An idea to fix it.

LOL! Perfect. :)

42 posted on 01/31/2007 5:37:59 AM PST by proud American in Canada ("We can, and we will prevail.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
My guess is they ground Hubble's mirror to the same specifications as they did for all Keyhole mirrors. Only problem is, Keyhole mirrors are ground to focus on the Earth about 250 miles away, while Hubble was supposed to focus at infinity.

Not only did they grind it to those specs - they also tested it on the KH stand, rather than recalibrate for its mission, so it passed its tests.

As Captain Kirk would say: "You did not notice your error - that's two mistakes! You failed to correct your error. You are flawed!"

43 posted on 01/31/2007 5:43:16 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (A living insult to islam since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

44 posted on 01/31/2007 6:01:56 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Must... sterilize...


45 posted on 01/31/2007 6:09:33 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (A living insult to islam since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson