Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Even Democrats Say Hillary Can't Win
NewsMax ^ | 31 January 2007 | Dick Morris & Eileen McGann

Posted on 01/30/2007 10:38:09 PM PST by Aussie Dasher

A neat bit of polling by the Gallup Organization shows that what's hurting Hillary Clinton in the Democratic presidential primaries.

It isn't so much her vote on Iraq or even her flip-flops on the issue. What's undermining her support among liberals is doubts about her electability.

The poll results suggest that many liberals see the primaries as a kind of audition where they assess not only whether they like or agree with a candidate, but whether she can lead them to the White House in 2008. This degree of pragmatism is often seen in Republican circles, but is relatively new on the other side of the aisle.

Gallup asked a national sample of Democratic primary voters from Jan. 5-7 if they'd vote for Hillary if the primary were today. About a third (34 percent) said they definitely would, and about half (52 percent) said they "might consider" voting for her.

The remaining 14 percent said they would "definitely not" support her in the primary.

Then, Gallup followed up with the two-thirds of the sample that was not "definitely" voting for Hillary — asking why. The No. 1 reason? They felt she couldn't win.

Twenty-nine percent cited the fear that she would lose the general election; 16 percent mentioned her inability to win the nomination as a "major reason" for not voting for her.

Many cited both.

Only 26 percent said the major reason for their lack of support was disagreement on the issues; 11 percent cited personal dislike of her, and 10 percent said they didn't want "another Clinton in the White House."

This indicates that there is a large "secondary market" for attacks on Sen. Clinton. The primary market for such attacks is, of course, the legions of general-election voters who don't like her and don't think she should be president (including us). But liberals, while not necessarily embracing the negatives themselves, see them as a cause to doubt her political viability — and thus a reason not to vote for her.

So attacks on Hillary are not just important among the Hillary-haters — they also fuel doubts even among Democratic true-believers.

This, while she faces a double (or triple) squeeze play — her charisma squeezed by the first female speaker of the House, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, and her ideological positioning under pressure from Sen. Barack Obama from the center and ex-Sen. John Edwards from the left.

All that could leave her the second choice of too many Democrats — especially if they really conclude she can't win.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; dickmorris; election2008; herthighness; hildebeast; hillary; hillaryclinton; hillaryrodham; hitlary; hitlery; mrsbj; rats; rodham
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: spikeytx86

I agree. Edwards is their man!


21 posted on 01/30/2007 11:14:09 PM PST by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: potlatch


22 posted on 01/30/2007 11:19:47 PM PST by devolve ( ........"refresh" my (updated) graphics posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Snicker! Plenty of yellow brick road for me to travel there!!


23 posted on 01/30/2007 11:23:05 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: potlatch


LOL!

I wanted to fill up your screen!


24 posted on 01/30/2007 11:29:17 PM PST by devolve ( ........"refresh" my (updated) graphics posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer
Very true but the Perot factor was huge in that election. No Perot and probably no Clinton.

We'll never know. Clinton won his party's nomination, so it's possible he could have won without Perot in the race.

I think Bill Clinton won because he is "an unusually good liar", as Bob Kerrey put it.

25 posted on 01/30/2007 11:29:31 PM PST by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: devolve

It totally filled up my 19 inch screen so you did a good job of it, lol.


26 posted on 01/30/2007 11:38:16 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: potlatch


Looks really good

That is the larger "M" size .gif

Have an addition I'll try too




27 posted on 01/30/2007 11:43:11 PM PST by devolve ( ........"refresh" my (updated) graphics posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Prost1
Reminds me of people who use the word "quote" as a noun.

And the simpletons who use:

your vs. you're

there vs. their

to vs. too

For a lesson in poor grammar useage, listen to Sean Vannity; "three hours a day is all we ask."

28 posted on 01/30/2007 11:44:14 PM PST by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: devolve

M for medium?? Please don't use your large size BG, lol. Or maybe you mean the gif.


29 posted on 01/30/2007 11:45:39 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86
He's there man.

Huh? Where?

30 posted on 01/30/2007 11:45:56 PM PST by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: devolve
I'll fill yer screen two.



31 posted on 01/30/2007 11:48:55 PM PST by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
All well and good but we should take NO chances!!!

She can't win - I've said it many times, but Edwards can, and he is even more scary.

32 posted on 01/30/2007 11:55:03 PM PST by Northern Alliance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RepoGirl; ChuxsterS

bump


33 posted on 01/31/2007 12:00:33 AM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99 (proud sponsor of the "helmets for democrats" foundation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Gawd!...Why did u do that!...Now I want to make one of those...lol
34 posted on 01/31/2007 12:40:54 AM PST by M-cubed (Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Run, Hillary. RUN!


35 posted on 01/31/2007 12:48:06 AM PST by TigersEye (Ego chatters endlessly on. Mind speaks in great silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Clinton won his party's nomination, so it's possible he could have won without Perot in the race.

Not only possible, probable. Perot would have had to have pulled about 65% of his votes from Bush to have tilted the election to Clinton. I doubt that happened.

36 posted on 01/31/2007 1:03:40 AM PST by Fresh Wind (All we are sa-a-a-ying, is give Beast a chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

=:- )


37 posted on 01/31/2007 1:43:04 AM PST by Seadog Bytes (OPM - The Liberal 'solution' to every societal problem. (Other People's Money))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I've got this little Hillery doll and I keep sticking pins and needles through its heart. Hasn't done any good then I remembered she hasn't a heart. So I started sticking pins and needles in its head and then I remembered she has no brain. So finally I started sticking them in her butt cause everyone knows full well she has an aple one of those.


38 posted on 01/31/2007 3:17:20 AM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

No, no, not pins and needles! You need to use a miniature wooden stake. Also have a cross and holy water handy!


39 posted on 01/31/2007 3:33:24 AM PST by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
This was written on an odd day. On odd days little dick says the beast can't win. Tomorrow he will assure us all that say can't lose.
40 posted on 01/31/2007 4:41:32 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Millions of Democrat babies aborted in 1989 or earlier won't vote this year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson