Skip to comments.
WaPo Columnist: US Troops 'Naive Mercenaries' -- What Do We Really Owe Them?
NewsBusters ^
| Mark Finkelstein
Posted on 02/01/2007 10:25:42 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
Half-serious warning: those with heart conditions are advised to have their medications handy when reading this.
With Democrats in congressional power, are leftists feeling suddenly empowered to express formerly taboo views? First came a column in the Los Angeles Times arguing we have overreacted to 9-11. Now comes Washington Post columnist William Arkin to express contempt for our troops and question how much we really owe them after all.
Excerpts from The Troops Also Need to Support the American People:
- "I've been mulling over an NBC Nightly News report from Iraq last Friday in which a number of soldiers expressed frustration with opposition to war in the United States. I'm all for everyone expressing their opinion, even those who wear the uniform of the United States Army. But I also hope that military commanders took the soldiers aside after the story and explained to them why it wasn't for them to disapprove of the American people."
- "These soldiers should be grateful that the American public, which by all polls overwhelmingly disapproves of the Iraq war and the President's handling of it, do still offer their support to them, and their respect."
- "Through every Abu Ghraib and Haditha, through every rape and murder, the American public has indulged those in uniform, accepting that the incidents were the product of bad apples or even of some administration or command order."
- "We pay the soldiers a decent wage, take care of their families, provide them with housing and medical care and vast social support systems and ship obscene amenities into the war zone for them, we support them in every possible way, and their attitude is that we should in addition roll over and play dead, defer to the military and the generals and let them fight their war, and give up our rights and responsibilities to speak up because they are above society?"
- DEFIBRILLATOR ALERT: "The recent NBC report is just an ugly reminder of the price we pay for a mercenary - oops sorry, volunteer - force that thinks it is doing the dirty work. The notion of dirty work is that, like laundry, it is something that has to be done but no one else wants to do it. But Iraq is not dirty work: it is not some necessary endeavor; the people just don't believe that anymore."
- "They are young and naïve and are frustrated with their own lack of progress and the never changing situation in Iraq. Cut off from society and constantly told that everyone supports them, no wonder the debate back home confuses them."
- "America needs to ponder what it is we really owe those in uniform."
Don't think the Washington Post didn't know what they were getting when they hired Arkin to write a column. Arkin is a man who once wrote a book divulging the secret locations of nuclear bases around the world.
Mark was in Iraq in November. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net
TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bsn; communistnewsnetwork; fink; iraq; newyorkslimes; washingtonpost; williamarkin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-79 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...
Have-defibrillator-handy alert ping to Today show list.
2
posted on
02/01/2007 10:26:43 AM PST
by
governsleastgovernsbest
(Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
This is a new low - even for Pravda on the Potomac! Some visitors from the 82nd need to drop in on Mr Arkin.....
3
posted on
02/01/2007 10:29:21 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
4
posted on
02/01/2007 10:30:09 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Don't tell them what our Special Forces do. They'll want every Operator hanged for human rights violations.
5
posted on
02/01/2007 10:30:10 AM PST
by
wastedyears
( "Gun control is hitting your target accurately." - Richard Marcinko)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Is there any question now that our brave soliders and us and the right are fighting two enemies at once?
6
posted on
02/01/2007 10:30:32 AM PST
by
JacksonCalhoun
(CT native in exile in NC - we have moonbats here in Dixie, too)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
You forgot to post a SCUMBAG ALERT in the title.
7
posted on
02/01/2007 10:31:07 AM PST
by
Doctor Raoul
("BOAT PEOPLE" - The result of the last time the Democrats stabbed our allies in the back.)
To: wastedyears
special forces need to clear out the Wa Po because it seems to be a terrorist stronghold of support.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Bush Derangement Syndrome, political porn for these bathhouse boys and their feminist beards.
To: Rummyfan
Rush just read this piece on his show. This is the enemy folks. According to this lowlife schmuck, our troops are supposed to be grateful to slime like him and shut up. My blood just boils!
10
posted on
02/01/2007 10:32:53 AM PST
by
indylindy
(Liberals love crisis, create crisis and then dwell on them.)
To: Rummyfan
Perhaps the patriots and those who love freedom should just withdraw to Indiana or so, let the leftists have the East coast, then let the muzzies in to celebrate diversity.
10 years later the patriots can re-take the East coast and by then our liberal problem will have been abated.
11
posted on
02/01/2007 10:33:22 AM PST
by
lafroste
(gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Death where is thy sting? How much sharper than the serpent's tooth is the word of a thankless Arkin!
12
posted on
02/01/2007 10:34:48 AM PST
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(When I search out the massed wheeling circles of the stars, my feet no longer touch the earth)
To: governsleastgovernsbest

Where's that Gaydar graphic?
13
posted on
02/01/2007 10:34:58 AM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(] Tagline Under Construction [)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Ironically, this was the same argument used by general Westmoreland when arguing that the draft shouldn't be abolished, that a volunteer force was basically a mercenary army.
His arguments were subsequently taken apart by Milton Friedman who said that asking someone to choose to work for their own reasons, is almost always better than forcing them to do it at the point of a gun. Patriotic volunteers aren't mercenaries any more than draftees are slaves.
It's really ironic that this weasel um... respected journalist, would be channeling Westmoreland because it's probably the only time in his life he's ever agreed with him.
14
posted on
02/01/2007 10:35:06 AM PST
by
tcostell
(MOLON LABE)
To: governsleastgovernsbest

Fascinating...it's not every day you see a full-face Dirty Sanchez.
If you go out on the main forum, he's got a follow-up where he keeps digging. What an idiot.
15
posted on
02/01/2007 10:35:33 AM PST
by
RichInOC
("Out! Out!"--St. Dogbert)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
16
posted on
02/01/2007 10:36:05 AM PST
by
RandyRep
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I can't help but wonder why we tolerate this kind of stuff when we are at war.
17
posted on
02/01/2007 10:37:09 AM PST
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
William Arkin has body odor.
18
posted on
02/01/2007 10:37:20 AM PST
by
YourAdHere
(America's Freepers: The DC Chapter Needs You on Saturday March 17th!)
To: RichInOC
19
posted on
02/01/2007 10:38:34 AM PST
by
RichInOC
("Out! Out!"--St. Dogbert)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
clueless
One entry found for
clueless.
Main Entry:
clue·less Pronunciation:
'klü-l&s Function:
adjective1 : having or providing no clue <a
clueless case for the police to solve>
2 : completely or hopelessly bewildered, unaware, ignorant, or foolish <
clueless about what they want>
3 : William Arkin
20
posted on
02/01/2007 10:38:53 AM PST
by
ladtx
("It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it." -- -- General Douglas MacArthur)
To: RandyRep
21
posted on
02/01/2007 10:38:56 AM PST
by
ishabibble
(ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I just heard Rush read this. I'm spitting mad.
This man is despicable.
22
posted on
02/01/2007 10:40:16 AM PST
by
mombonn
(God is looking for spiritual fruit, not religious nuts.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Arkin's ignorance is almost laughable. Our men and women who serve in the military are NOT paid a decent wage. He sits in his comfortable home and doesn't understand the depth of a military family's sacrifice, not only on the front lines, but in the heart of the family, and at the grocery check-out.
It seems too easy to call him an idiot. He doesn't know what he is talking about.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
The assclown is in serious need of an "attitude adjustment" ... and not the kind you get at the local tavern
24
posted on
02/01/2007 10:40:32 AM PST
by
clamper1797
(What's black and brown and looks good on a lawyer ... a pair of Doberman's)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
(1) David Bell.
(2) William Arkin.
(3) That guy who wrote an oped last year against the troops whose name escapes me. If anyone remembers, please let me know.
To: RichInOC
I believe he's more illustrative of a Double Back Lumber Jack.
26
posted on
02/01/2007 10:40:46 AM PST
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I cannot respond to articles like this anymore....I just don't know what to say.
27
posted on
02/01/2007 10:41:26 AM PST
by
mystery-ak
(My Son, My Soldier, My Hero........God Speed Jonathan......)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
To: governsleastgovernsbest
This is an example of a hate America leftist, who sits around thoughtlessly enjoying his freedoms and lifestyle that was won by men and women of greater courage.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
One of the best way to support the Military and refute idiots like this is to elect one Duncan Hunter to President of the United States.So because he is solid on:
Life
Borders
Immigration
War On Terror
Strong Military
American Economy
Lower Taxes
FREEPERS WANT DUNCAN HUNTER FOR THE 2008 GOP NOMINEE - SO PLEASE VOTE IN THIS POLL.
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/poll?poll=170

30
posted on
02/01/2007 10:43:11 AM PST
by
GulfBreeze
(I Like Duncan Hunter for the GOP Presidential Nomination in 2008)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
We need a boot to the behind graphic for this thread.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
What we owe them is to identify each and every entity that advertises in the WaPo and boycott them, after sending batches of letters telling them why, along with a demand that this A**hole be fired. What a smug moronic intellectually challenged lightweight. If actions have no consequences there are no reasons to stop those actions.
To: o_zarkman44
special forces need to clear out the Wa Po because it seems to be a terrorist stronghold of support.People actually think I'm joking when I advocate this strategy in the GWOT.
33
posted on
02/01/2007 10:44:52 AM PST
by
AngryJawa
({NRA}{IDPA} GO HUNTER '08)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
From the American Standard: (Who is Alan Arkin)
The answer is best found in Arkin's own speech to an audience at the U.S. Naval War College on September 25, 2002. In this lengthy and vitriolic attack on the Bush administration, Arkin admitted to feeling "cynical about the fact that we are going to war to enhance the economic interests of the Enron class," and declared that "the war against terrorism is overstated." Arkin believed, in fact, that the war "is not the core United States national security interest today." He rhetorically asked the audience: "Aren't I just another leftist, self-hating American?" and condemned the administration for taking "enormous liberties with American freedoms."
34
posted on
02/01/2007 10:45:43 AM PST
by
Eva
To: GulfBreeze
Hunter, Hunter, he's our man!
After hearing Ann Coulter's rundown of the name candidates last night, I'm more convinced of DH than I was yesterday. But he needs to seriously up his recognition.
35
posted on
02/01/2007 10:46:45 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
are leftists feeling suddenly empowered to express formerly taboo views?Yes, they think the elections prove that the country actually agrees with them, despite the fact that they worked hard not to reveal themselves, and they are coming out of the woodwork all over the place.This could be a good thing.
36
posted on
02/01/2007 10:46:59 AM PST
by
Bahbah
(.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
"Mr. Arkin served in the U.S. Army from 1974-1978, and was an assistant to the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence of the US Commander Berlin. He was engaged in a number of covert intelligence collection projects and was the primary intelligence analyst for the West Berlin command."
Compromised while in this position? Compromised before he took this position? Stranger things have happened (and no, I'm not a tinfoil hat type).
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Arkin: Paper asshole alert.
38
posted on
02/01/2007 10:49:28 AM PST
by
pankot
To: governsleastgovernsbest
WOW I am speechless.
This is UNbelievable.
Marine Mom
39
posted on
02/01/2007 10:50:32 AM PST
by
NEMDF
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I wish, I wish, I wish...
For a dark alley and 2 minutes with this guy, ok maybe 60 seconds. All I want to do is talk - really - that's all.
40
posted on
02/01/2007 10:51:26 AM PST
by
BlueNgold
(Feed the Tree .....)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I belive Mr. Arkin was a once and former Greenpeace activist. When he's not out saving the gay whales, he's shilling for other causes near and dear the the leftist heart.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
How long until we hear 'Baby Killer'? I kinda miss that term.
42
posted on
02/01/2007 10:52:30 AM PST
by
chesty_puller
(USMC 70-73 3MAF VN 70-71 US Army 75-79 3d Inf Old Guard)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Ya know, if we were REALLY as we're portrayed, somebody would be visitin' this guy at about, say, 2 AM to have one last dicussion on this matter with him.
Too bad we're not. There is a difference between "freedom of speech and slander and treason. He should pay the price for crossing the line.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Apparently troops are only allowed to speak if they agree with lefties.
44
posted on
02/01/2007 10:55:26 AM PST
by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
To: Tzimisce
That applies to everybody. Komrade.
45
posted on
02/01/2007 10:56:50 AM PST
by
ichabod1
("Liberals read Karl Marx. Conservatives UNDERSTAND Karl Marx." Ronald Reagan)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
With Democrats in congressional power, are leftists feeling suddenly empowered to express formerly taboo views?>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Here in Vermont, its as if someone popped the cork on a bottle of liberal socialist whackos.They are inundating letters to the editor with their leftist invective, and parade on the street corners on Fridaus with paquards filled with jingoistic anti-Repub,=licanism, desifned to whip up people's emotions against the great Republican satan which had invaded their lives for 8 years.
Before the puling leftists were quieter, but now they are simply off the wall. ANd if you are NOT politically correct, then you are adjudged to be insane, or socially challenged.
The culture wars have returned with a vengeance.
46
posted on
02/01/2007 10:57:39 AM PST
by
Candor7
To: o_zarkman44
47
posted on
02/01/2007 10:57:50 AM PST
by
top 2 toe red
(~*~ All we have to do is save the Cheerleader?!?!? ~*~)
To: Jeff Chandler
I suspected that he was one of those people for whom it will always be 1968, and the picture proves it. What classic aging leftist creep. I wish they would all die off as quickly as possible.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Soldiers are entitled to their opinions, as well. Is Arkin trying to shut them up? It wouldn't surprise me. In any event, we owe the military a lot. We don't owe Arkin a thing.
49
posted on
02/01/2007 10:59:30 AM PST
by
popdonnelly
(Our first obligation is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
He leans so far left they can't even get a straight picture of him.
50
posted on
02/01/2007 11:00:55 AM PST
by
brothers4thID
(Hillary: "We are going to take from you.. to provide for the common good")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson