"Alexander Litvinenko, the former spy who was murdered in London, was a thug and a thief who had no need to flee to Britain because he was so insignificant, President Putin said yesterday."
If he was so 'insignifcant', then why was he killed? Hmmmmmmm??
posted on 02/01/2007 4:03:30 PM PST
(Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
If he was so 'insignifcant', then why was he killed? Hmmmmmmm??==
But WHO killed him? For him he was significant.
posted on 02/02/2007 1:13:21 AM PST
(The western MSM zombies the western publics.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson