Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Republican Party for the future
DC Examiner ^ | 2/2/07 | David Boaz

Posted on 02/02/2007 7:21:41 AM PST by steve-b

Jeb Bush got it right. He told conservatives at the National Review summit this past weekend that Republicans lost the 2006 elections because they abandoned their principles of limited government and fiscal responsibility.

Ronald Reagan won two landslide elections on a limited-government platform. Bush has twice squeaked through with his big-government conservatism....

The big problem for Republicans last November was the loss of moderate, independent, and libertarian voters to Democratic candidates. A new analysis of the American National Election Studies data shows that libertarian-leaning voters made up 15 percent of the electorate in 2002 and 16 percent in 2006.

Those voters gave Republican candidates for the House a 47-point margin in 2002, but that margin dropped to just 8 points in 2006. About 2 million libertarian voters switched parties in 2006, for a net Republican loss of 4 million votes. The shift was strongest among the youngest voters.

For decades, the Republican party united libertarians and conservatives against the big-government Democratic party. But the recent Republican trend toward big spending and centralization has discouraged both groups.

In one recent poll, voters preferred the Democrats by 2 to 1 to deal with the economy and the federal budget. Meanwhile, the party's tilt toward social conservatism — the anti-gay marriage amendment, the clumsy intrusion into Terri Schiavo's hospital room, the "intelligent design" crusade — has turned off younger and more libertarian voters....

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gop; republican

1 posted on 02/02/2007 7:21:42 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Jeb Bush got it right. He told conservatives at the National Review summit this past weekend that Republicans lost the 2006 elections because they abandoned their principles of limited government and fiscal responsibility.

And where was he last Fall?

2 posted on 02/02/2007 7:24:07 AM PST by Long Island Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

It's a difficult time for Republicans because I think that people are liking cradle to grave entitlements and they realize that staunch Republicans aren't going to give it to them.

We had our chance to educate people during these last 6 years and we blew it. Big time.

So now the Republicans see the handwriting on the wall and will move to the mushy middle. I could be wrong, but that's how I see it.


3 posted on 02/02/2007 7:28:34 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
they abandoned their principles of limited government and fiscal responsibility

..he's right, but only a partial list--I could add waffling on the WOT and sending mixed messages on border security...

4 posted on 02/02/2007 7:30:30 AM PST by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Jeb Bush got it right. He told conservatives at the National Review summit this past weekend that Republicans lost the 2006 elections because they abandoned their principles of limited government and fiscal responsibility.

He ought to talk to his brother about that....

5 posted on 02/02/2007 7:31:40 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Long Island Pete
And where was he last Fall?

Maybe he had duped himself into believing that everything was just peachy keen with the Republicans. Quite a few people around here sure did.

6 posted on 02/02/2007 7:31:53 AM PST by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: liberateddem

No more Bushes for me.


8 posted on 02/02/2007 7:44:10 AM PST by brushcop (Men of B-Co 2/69 3ID, do you now feel betrayed after all your efforts & sacrifices in Iraq?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

The consistent misrepresentation of the Schaivo case and of Intelligent Design is more than a little troubling. The Urban myths surrounding these seminal issues are a deliberate distraction from the truths and powerful principles underlying them. Both are vigorously liberatarian issues.
Schaivo because the collusion of a contemptuous husband and corrupt officials denied a young woman and her family the right to life.
ID because public school teaching about the nature of reality is now cast in concrete by atheist technicians.
There is profound confusion about basic moral issues in our culture. That abortion advocates place all emphasis upon the interests of a woman during her pregnancy and none upon the person she is carrying is the clearest example of the absolute abrogation of morality.
The Republican party has utterly defaulted on its platform of fighting for basic freedoms by allowing deliberate falsehoods and distortions to stand uncontested. Republican leaders are guilty of the cowardly failure to confront those who demand the right to be immoral.


9 posted on 02/02/2007 7:48:40 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (here come I, gravitas in tow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Long Island Pete

Exactly. If Jeb had run against Bill Nelson, he would probably have won that Senate seat for the Republicans, and the Dims would not now hold a one seat majority in the Senate.


10 posted on 02/02/2007 7:51:46 AM PST by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Yes, and as long as the Republican candidate and platform are 0.0000001% less socialist than the Democrats, the usual FR chorus will be loudly demanding we cross that well-trodden broken glass to pull the GOP lever.


11 posted on 02/02/2007 7:58:23 AM PST by Doghouse Riley (No war unless it's total war for total victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner

What border security?


12 posted on 02/02/2007 8:17:52 AM PST by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Any voter wanting smaller, less intrusive government won't find it in eaither of the major parties at this point. And without the smaller, less intrusive government voters, the Republicans can't beat the dems. It's going to be a long, cold winter if they refuse to return to their conservative roots.


13 posted on 02/02/2007 8:22:50 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biff
What border security?

..touche

14 posted on 02/02/2007 8:28:38 AM PST by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
The big problem for Republicans last November was the loss of moderate, independent, and libertarian voters...

Maybe this will shut the "hope you're happy, you conservatives who stayed home wah waah wahhhhhh!",folks here on FR. The fact is, conservatives did vote republican, we lost the moderate vote because of spineless demo-lite pubs now in office. So why don't you naysayers shut up.

FMCDH(BITS)

15 posted on 02/02/2007 11:09:48 AM PST by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Bush has twice squeaked through with his big-government conservatism....

Bwaahhhaaaaahhhaaaaa!

16 posted on 02/02/2007 3:00:55 PM PST by Celtman (It's never right to do wrong to do right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew
So why don't you naysayers shut up?

They don't shut up because they have nothing else to say and they have no sense of introspection. Most can't be expected to say, "for 6 years I've been a cheerleader, pimping for things that, had Clinton done them, I would have screamed about. Mea Culpa."

No, they have to blame someone else, innocent bystanders who get pilloried for daring to point out the lack of the emperor's clothes.

17 posted on 02/03/2007 3:15:26 AM PST by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson