Wash. initiative would require married couples to have kids

NWCN.com ^ | 12:59 PM PST on Tuesday, February 6, 2007 | KING5.com Staff and Associated Press

[metmom]

Ooops. Missed it. My ping list has been pretty active as I've been on the HPV vaccine threads.

[WKB]

Baptista sonido

[Friend_from_the_Frozen_North]

I find it curious that Gays & Lesbians are so easily offended and yet pull stupid stunts like this every other day or so and think everyone else (the 98 percent or so of "normal" as opposed to the sick, twisted, and perverted) are just going to overlook their stupid moronic stunts...

[WKB]

I guess we have to consider the source.

[Let's Roll]

It's obvious that what they really want is the destruction of marriage. Guess it hasn't been progressing as fast as they'd planned.

[LtdGovt]

If homosexual behavior was JUST having a sense of style, an effeminate lisp, a predilection for odd pets, there would be no issues.

Actually, there would be, because the effeminate lisp is one of the most annoying sounds in the world.

BUT IT"S MORE! It's kidnapping and raping little boys

No, it's not. It's more the exception than the rule. If you actually study the sexual abuse of children, you will see that it is far more complicated than: 'boys are only raped by gays' and that kind of thing.

[jonascord]

You are deconstructing the subject to support your argument. Heterosexual marriage is a creation of a civilization. We civilized types do not permit base animal lust to become the center of our self image. And, yet, I am supposed to somehow treat some aged sex-obsessed child with a constant erection as an equal? Sorry, I'm too much of a snob.

Homosexual "marriage" is an attempt to legalize the fiction that homosexual behaviors are, in some liberal fantasy, normal. NAMBLA is large enough to rate representation by GLAAD. The problem GLAAD has is that if they admit pedophilia is bad, then they are being "judgemental". So, it's back to pretending that it's all good, and that love and lust have nothing in common.

It seems that international Internet child porn rings get busted about once a month. It's amazing how many of them are "gender-neutral" in the media. I'm a little curious as to the GLAAD take on the guy who ruptured his intestines servicing a horse.

[LtdGovt]

You start talking about marriage. But you're changing the subject, marriage is not what I was talkinga bout. Being against gay marriage is perfectly reasonable, I'm not comfortable with two men marrying either. However, it's not reasonable to brand all gay men as pedophiles, because they're not (some are, but not all).

And, yet, I am supposed to somehow treat some aged sex-obsessed child with a constant erection as an equal?

Uhm, what are you talking about? Children?

The problem GLAAD has is that if they admit pedophilia is bad, then they are being "judgemental"

No. Think about it. Pedophilia infringes upon the rights of children, they cannot consent to sexual acts. The same cannot be said of homosexuality. So it's not really my business, is it? (I do respond to you because of my belief in privacy.)

It seems that international Internet child porn rings get busted about once a month. It's amazing how many of them are "gender-neutral" in the media.

Well, I'm glad that they are. And most pedophiles are gender-neutral too. It's usually not a boy or a girl that they lust after, but a child. That is, I think, because the anatomical differences between boys and girls are not as developed, as they are with men and women. But as I said before, I strongly suggest that you study the subject of child pornography.

I'm a little curious as to the GLAAD take on the guy who ruptured his intestines servicing a horse.

If you ask me, I think he got what he deserved. Do you agree?

[Zathras]

For those who don't know, we are known as "Breeders" by the more militant members of the community.