Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steeling the Future
National Review ^ | 2/8/07 | Peter Kirsanow

Posted on 02/08/2007 6:37:39 AM PST by B Knotts

Two simple and succinct comments made by Michael Steele and Newt Gingrich at the National Review Institute Conservative Summit last month provide guidance to the conservative movement and the Republican party on how to sell their ideas and widen their base. Were the advice to be followed, the entire country would benefit.

Gingrich observed that conservatives have a tendency to take self-defeating pride in not paying attention to language. By this he wasn’t saying that conservatives should employ politically-correct language, but rather, that conservatives need to improve their ability to communicate their ideas and message to the broader public.

For his part, Steele stated that despite his opponent’s furious efforts to dissuade black voters from supporting him, he received 30 percent of the black vote because he took his conservative message directly to such voters and declared, unapologetically, “This is who I am.” (Yes, being black didn’t hurt either.)

Support for the Republican party among blacks remains abysmal. Yet Republicans may have recently begun to do a slightly better job of following the advice of Gingrich and the example of Steele. Despite averaging about 12 percent of the black vote over the last two decades, Republicans have shown faint signs of progress. For example, in 2004 President Bush nearly doubled the number of black votes he received in 2000.

Republicans have suffered a setback due to the racially charged rhetoric surrounding Katrina, but there’s no evidence that the effect will be long term.

(Excerpt) Read more at article.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; gingrich; michaelsteele; newt; newtgingrich; race; steele
Some thoughts on communicating conservatism more effectively.
1 posted on 02/08/2007 6:37:41 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: B Knotts; newheart; Prov3456; beckysueb; Tolik; RebekahT; BUSHdude2000; Jet Jaguar; familyop; ...
Newt '08 PING

FReepmail me to get on/off the Newt '08 Ping List

2 posted on 02/08/2007 6:38:10 AM PST by B Knotts (Newt '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

Sounds like they hired Frank Luntz.......


3 posted on 02/08/2007 6:46:26 AM PST by OldFriend (Swiftboating - Sinking a politician's Ship of Fools by Torpedoes of Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Gingrich observed that conservatives have a tendency to take self-defeating pride in not paying attention to language. By this he wasn’t saying that conservatives should employ politically-correct language, but rather, that conservatives need to improve their ability to communicate their ideas and message to the broader public.

Truth is not hard to articulate.

4 posted on 02/08/2007 6:48:30 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

Very interesting article! Those two are my top choices for vice presidential candidates - both have outstanding conservative credentials, are extremely good speakers and can not be elected President (yet). Newt has extremely high negatives and Michael needs more national experience and exposure before he could top the ticket.


5 posted on 02/08/2007 6:51:17 AM PST by RebelBanker (May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt
Truth is not hard to articulate.

This is true. However, it is hard for many people to accept. I agree with Newt that articulating the truth may be done in ways that make it even harder to accept. For example, if you accept that affirmative action is bad, you may make your case by emphasizing the truth that it is unfair to whites. This approach to the truth may be hard for many minorities to accept. Alternatively, you may truthfully point out that it hurts minorities. Both are true and both support the underlying truth that affirmative action is bad. One approach is likely yield more minority votes than the other.

6 posted on 02/08/2007 7:00:31 AM PST by outofstyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Here's a thought. How about actually talkng about the real problems our Republic faces. We have morphed into a socialist/capitalist society which according to the real definition of such a thing is Fascism.

We have a Eugenic society that supports and promotes among other things a contraception mentality. We are either forced of encouraged to have small families and to follow the jobs wherever they take us without regard to family. We postmodern "conservatives" bemoan abortion without realizing that it is just another form of contraception which is necessary to sustain our Eugenic Society.

All of this was explained back in the 1920's by Chesterton in "Eugenics and Other Evils" What is amazing is that most of us are unaware of our own biases and how they blind us.

7 posted on 02/08/2007 7:00:54 AM PST by RichardMoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
The appeal of the [liberal] model isn’t confined just to blacks. It appeals to the media in search of a narrative that validates their preconceptions, to baby boomers seeking to recapture the heady days of the civil rights movement, to egalitarians aspiring to a utopian society, and to soccer moms and the like who, in good faith, want to do the “right” thing. That’s a lot of voters and a lot of political clout.

It is THIS theme that we need to defeat. We need to demonstrate clearly, convincingly, and repeatedly that the "heady days of the civil rights movement" were a nadir for our country's unity, and that most of the agitation was inspired by socialist rainmakers or bored youths who wanted to skip their English Comp class. The "egalitarian" societies of the utopians have resulted in the worst horrors this world has ever seen, from the French Revolution to Stalin's purges. And the "right thing" to do is to allow people their own freedoms, rather than having a false set of values imposed on them by their ideological overlords.

The image of the Caring Liberal versus the Cold-hearted Conservative CAN be defeated. But it takes a consistent message driven by a consistent philosophy and backed by an unapologetic adherence to principle.

8 posted on 02/08/2007 7:09:27 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichardMoore

I have long thought that a team of volunters could put together a course on practical economics and take it into disadvantaged areas with good results.


9 posted on 02/08/2007 7:21:10 AM PST by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
For example, in 2004 President Bush nearly doubled the number of black votes he received in 2000.

Because he continues to move the GOP leftward.

10 posted on 02/08/2007 7:22:25 AM PST by Spirochete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
The image of the Caring Liberal versus the Cold-hearted Conservative CAN be defeated. But it takes a consistent message...

I believe that this is true. It is true and vitally important. At this moment in history however, sadly, it appears that too few people grasp this and are willing to do their part.

11 posted on 02/08/2007 6:17:39 PM PST by outofstyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson