Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Quantum computer to debut next week
Techworld ^ | 08 February 2007 | Peter Judge

Posted on 02/09/2007 11:28:07 AM PST by US admirer

Twenty years before most scientists expected it, a commercial company has announceda quantum computer that promises to massively speed up searches and optimisation calculations.

D-Wave of British Columbia has promised to demonstrate a quantum computer next Tuesday, that can carry out 64,000 calculations simultaneously (in parallel "universes"), thanks to a new technique which rethinks the already-uncanny world of quantum computing. But the academic world is taking a wait-and-see approach.

D-Wave is the world's only "commercial" quantum computing company, backed by more than $20 million of venture capital (there are more commercial ventures in the related field of quantum cryptography). Its stated aim is to eventually produce commercially available quantum computers that can be used online or shipped to computer rooms, where they will solve intractable and expensive problems such as financial optimisation. It has been predicted that quantum computing will make current computer security obsolete, cracking any current cryptography scheme by providing an unlimited amount of simultaneous processing resources. Multiple quantum states exist at the same time, so every quantum bit or "qubit" in such a machine is simultaneously 0 and 1. D-Wave's prototype has only 16 qubits, but systems with hundreds of qubits would be able to process more inputs than there are atoms in the universe.

Scientists in the world's many quantum science departments are looking anxiously at whether the demonstration - linked to a computer museum in Mountain View California, will vindicate their work or cast doubt upon it.

"This is somewhat like claims of cold fusion," said Professor Andrew Steane of Oxford University's Centre for Quantum Computing. "I doubt that this computing method is substantially easier to achieve than any other."

Others are more enthusiastic: "I'll be a bit of a sceptic till I see what they have done," said Professor Seth Lloyd of MIT. "But I'm happy these guys are doing it." Lloyd is one of the scientists who helped develop the "adiabatic" model of quantum computing which D-Wave's system exploits - a method which D-Wave believes will sidestep the problems which have restricted progress in quantum computing so far.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: computing; dwave; fastashell; it; quantum; quantumcomputing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

1 posted on 02/09/2007 11:28:09 AM PST by US admirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: US admirer

Ziggy, is that you?


2 posted on 02/09/2007 11:30:59 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US admirer
"D-Wave's prototype has only 16 qubits, but systems with hundreds of qubits would be able to process more inputs than there are atoms in the universe. "

That line just hurt my head thinking about...

3 posted on 02/09/2007 11:31:20 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US admirer

Or maybe it wont at the same time.


4 posted on 02/09/2007 11:31:20 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US admirer

Don't understand it, but it sounds good.


5 posted on 02/09/2007 11:33:10 AM PST by Califelephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US admirer

To someone who still has a slide rule in his desk somewhere all I can do is shake my head and smile when I hear the younger generations talking now and the tools they take for granted.


6 posted on 02/09/2007 11:34:21 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US admirer

Now this is interesting. I will be very interested in hearing the results.


7 posted on 02/09/2007 11:34:52 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US admirer
but systems with hundreds of qubits would be able to process more inputs than there are atoms in the universe.

>POP<

Ouch.

8 posted on 02/09/2007 11:35:57 AM PST by Ramius ([sip])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US admirer

Extremely neat technology. In a few decades, high-qbit-count quantum computers will be as far head of today's machines as a 1GHz wireless notebook is ahead of Eniac.

The cool thing, addressing NP-complete problems, is that rather than sequentially chugging thru all possible solutions to complex problems, a quantum computer can _be_ in all those solutions simultaniously. We currently can't imagine the possibilites.


9 posted on 02/09/2007 11:36:26 AM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US admirer

Porn at the speed of thought.........


10 posted on 02/09/2007 11:36:55 AM PST by Red Badger (Rachel Carson is responsible for more deaths than Adolf Hitler...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US admirer

A quantum computer can still compute without being turned on, so I don't understand why they bother to make it, since it's already operational?


11 posted on 02/09/2007 11:38:10 AM PST by Kurt_Hectic (Trust only what you see, not what you hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US admirer

We'll all need one of these to run the next version of Windows given how big Vista is..


12 posted on 02/09/2007 11:38:40 AM PST by IamConservative (Any man who agrees with you on everything, will lie to anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US admirer

Several months ago I read a book called "A Different Universe" by Robert B. Laughlin, a Nobel laureate in quantum physics. I don't have the book handy (I returned it to the library), but if I recall correctly he basically said that the idea of quantum computing is based on a fundamental misunderstanding and cannot work. We'll know eventually, I suppose.


13 posted on 02/09/2007 11:39:55 AM PST by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

LOL! That's the first use that you can think of for this?


14 posted on 02/09/2007 11:41:28 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RussP

Marx said the same about capitalism.


15 posted on 02/09/2007 11:41:43 AM PST by Kurt_Hectic (Trust only what you see, not what you hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

"The cool thing, addressing NP-complete problems, is that rather than sequentially chugging thru all possible solutions to complex problems, a quantum computer can _be_ in all those solutions simultaniously. We currently can't imagine the possibilites."

Does this mean secure banking is out the window?!? I don't want to go back to a paper check-book!


16 posted on 02/09/2007 11:42:59 AM PST by petro45acp (SUPPORT/BE YOUR LOCAL SHEEPDOG! "On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs" By David Grossman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Porn at the speed of thought.........

and instant punishment for thinking about it LOL

17 posted on 02/09/2007 11:43:08 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo (If the Moon wasn't there, people would have traveled to Mars by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RussP
he basically said that the idea of quantum computing is based on a fundamental misunderstanding and cannot work

That's how the Infinite Improbability drive was invented ;-)

18 posted on 02/09/2007 11:43:19 AM PST by Squawk 8888 (Is human activity causing the warming trend on Mars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

No, actually it was my second. My first thought was pi...........then one thing led to another.........


19 posted on 02/09/2007 11:43:35 AM PST by Red Badger (Rachel Carson is responsible for more deaths than Adolf Hitler...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

What does any of this have to do with Anna Nicole Smith?


20 posted on 02/09/2007 11:43:36 AM PST by GulfBreeze (I Like Duncan Hunter for the GOP Presidential Nomination in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson