Posted on 02/10/2007 11:06:31 AM PST by AZRepublican
You are making a lot out of nothing.
I went to your reference, and found that they had the same substance. They were not in the same order, but they give the same instruction.
There may also be some differences because of translation differences, but that does not change the substance of what is being taught.
bookmark
If the court was acting under Marbury v Madison than the ACLU could not exist.
"It is also not entirely unworthy of observation that in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land the Constitution itself is first mentioned, and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution have that rank."
Any one thinking that the Ten Commandments are uniquely Christian needs to regroup. Last I read, the Ten were passed from God to Moses, an absolutely, positively, Jewish patriarch. The Commandments, being universally good for society and man, were taken into Christianity.
The site you reference is pure anti-Christian propaganda.
It says, "One of the best-kept secrets in the discussions on the Ten Commandments concerns..." (emphasis is mine) followed by information which is well known to anyone with the least knowledge of the Bible. All is stated as if this is some huge conspiracy.
Give us a break!
The correct translation is thou shall not murder
Big difference.
Once you start throwing out centuries of settled law (which is what the argument against incorporation argues we should do) what makes you think you have the power to stop the yarn unravelling?
The Rehnquist court had already started the unraveling of the incorporation theory. Many so-called settled precedents have been unraveled over time to bring law within the limitations imposed upon congress and federal judiciary by the letter of the constitution.
Are you kidding? Once the Muslims get enough votes in any community that's exactly what will happen. And the ACLU will lead the charge for Muslim rights.
There is already a PUBLIC high school in Dearborn, Michigan with a 99% Muslim population that has allowed "prayer rooms" for students to pray to Mecca five times a day.
Is anybody covering this? The ACLU in Michigan has no problem with it. It's just an "aspect of their culture".
You must understand that liberals have two standards, one for conservatives and twenty-five others for whatever else comes up.
They had no problem removing the crucifix on the California seal even though that was historical.
"Once the Muslims get enough votes in any community that's exactly what will happen."
Exactly. Which is why I brought it up. So, no, I'm not kidding.
Yup, Brown v Board of Ed certainly unravelled the yarn.
Idea of incorporation? Which idea would that be? The one that incorporates 5 Justices idea that the US Constitution prohibits a valedictorian from witnessing and then incorporate that to the states or the idea of incorporation that doesn't incorporate the second amendment to the states?
The ACLU are, and have been, a serious threat to our institutions. They are not just a group of naive "Liberals."
William Flax
I really enjoyed that link you provided, and have bookmarked it. Thanks.
Nothing against those who seek it legally.
Huge problems with those who come here illegally, and with those who play word games by calling illegal aliens "immigrants". Sophomoric.
The San Diego Union has taken to calling them 'entrants.'
Funny how that sounds so much like 'entrance.'
entrance
......in a trance
ahem
BTTT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.