Posted on 02/13/2007 9:24:39 AM PST by Mia T
Why does Hillary like Communism? Because she can be a modern day Caesar.
The only good thing about SHillary wiining is Bill will have to be first lady. LOL! I would still keep him away from the interns.
thanx.
The cowardice and corruption of the political class (and I include the media here) make them unreachable.
But we can reach the uniformed, misinformed and disinformed voters. We must target the demographic clinton is targeting: women, and especially young, single women. I will be posting more on this soon.
Once again, please remove me from your ping list--as I find your outrage at Slick and his wife inconsistent, compomised and very selective--at best (being generous here).
I share your disgust about the damage that Slick and his wife have done to this country. If you knew me personally, you would have a really hard time finding anyone that despised Slick more than I did. Same for his lovely wife.
Having said that, I find your willingness to support for President the most vocal liberal, Clinton-APOLOGIST totally inconsistent with your anti-Clinton postings for the last few years. I would use the term 'hypocrisy', but that probably is a bit too strong. Maybe, maybe not--but I won't use it again.
Don't you see the pathetic irony and INCONSISTENCY in your supporting a Clinton-apologist for President?
At the risk of repeating myself here, let's look at Guiliani's public comments (paraphrasing).
(1) Shortly before his 'last-minute' endorsement of Bob Dole in the 1996 presidential election, [Giuliani] told the Post's Jack Newfield that "most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine." No surprise here--as they are both liberals. I'm sure that played really well at the Kos, DU, the DNC, etc.
(2) The Daily News quoted [Giuliani] as saying that March: "Whether you talk about President Clinton, Senator Dole.... The country would be in very good hands in the hands of any of that group." OH REALLY???? I won't even go there.
(3) Combine those two comments with Guiliani's OUTRAGEOUS defense of Slick in the WOT after the Chris Wallace meltdown interview, "I don't blame Clinton. He did all that he could do"! This is the most incredibly OUTRAGEOUS of all his comments!! How could he even say that with a straight (no pun intended) face?
Outrageous, absolutely outrageous. If he really said that (which he did)--why would we expect him to be any stronger in the WOT. I won't 'beat this dead horse' anymore--as I think I covered his DEFENSE OF SLICK adequately the last time I addressed this issue with you.
I hope that someone in the press asks Rudy who he voted for in '92 and '96.
Let me sum up my comments to you with this one statement. I could understand your willingness to support Rudy AFTER the primaries (if, in fact, he is nominated), but your willingness to support him BEFORE the primaries have even begun--totally negates much of the outrage that you have posted about Slick and his supporters in the last few years. The operative word here is "BEFORE". A few words come to mind there, pathetic irony, inconsistency, compromised principles, selective outrage,,,,ok, I won't mention the other. When it comes to your postings about Slick's sycophants and supporters, the term 'double standard' also comes to mind.
You don't need to respond with some 'tortured explanation' of how you feel that Rudy is electable, and Hillary must be stopped, or something along those lines--yada, yada, yada. You could have made the case for him against Hillary AFTER the primaries--not before. Please don't waste your time now.
For the last time, please remove me from your ping list.
The husband would be emasculated in more ways than one... (not that there is much there to emasculate).
Ceiling's finished and I bought the paint for the walls/trim this morn. Wanna know which colors I chose?
I am so sorry, stockstrader.
With all the back and forth we had the other day, I completely forgot to remove you from my ping list. Will do that right now (and will leave my 'why Rudy?' response to my next post, thereby sparing you any additional angst arising out of the supposed cognitive dissonance).
The 'logic' of those refusing to vote for Rudy:
Rudy is a too 'liberal' 'New Yorker' so they will place their de facto vote for missus clinton, a Stalinist New Yorker, albeit fake, (fake New Yorker, not fake Stalinist), who
It does the conservative cause no good to become petulant and self-destructive.
Do conservatives really want
I find it hard to believe that those people aren't able to discern the difference between Giuliani and clinton. Frankly, if true, it is frightening.
I am advocating for Giuliani not because of his ideology. I am advocating for him because I believe he possesses the qualities that this country desperately needs in these perilous times... and because I believe he, unlike all the others, will win.
The other night, I heard a man who is not perfect, but a man of rare intelligence, humility, warmth, competence, strength and leadership.
We will be fortunate, indeed, and our babies, born and unborn, living and not yet imagined, will be infinitely safer, if he is our next president.
Some people I know would dispute that. ;)
of course. :)
Tony is actively pursuing this issue...he is very vocal on his radio show. He is then promoted to Press Secretary. Just thinking aloud here...
P.S. Glad to see you survived the ceiling and Taylor Dayne's swoon factor. ;)
Sounds stunning.
Thanks. After it's finished I'll take a picture or two.
Really? ;(
Looking forward to seeing it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.