Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sean Hannity Live Radio Thread 02/13/07

Posted on 02/13/2007 11:35:56 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241 next last
To: ChicagoConservative27
Probably this weekend, she'll be beat from the red-eye.
181 posted on 02/13/2007 2:09:57 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks (If you don't love Jesus, you can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: StoneWall Brigade

"breakfast"???

Are you living in sin?


182 posted on 02/13/2007 2:11:29 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks (If you don't love Jesus, you can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: aligncare

The right Republican can win Minnesota. President Bush probably did win it, but The Cities stole it for Kerry.


183 posted on 02/13/2007 2:15:00 PM PST by defconw ( Mrs. Cibco in 74 days! Woo Hoo! WTG COLTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: aligncare

Sure would be nice if Sean asked Rudy my question.

He's on record saying the global warming debate "is almost unnecessary ... because we should be dealing with pollution anyway."


184 posted on 02/13/2007 2:19:52 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks (If you don't love Jesus, you can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Sean is kissing Guiliani's butt. IMHO Rudy is not an eloquent speaker.
185 posted on 02/13/2007 2:23:07 PM PST by stevio (Rudy? Don't make me puke.(NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

No She'll be coming over


186 posted on 02/13/2007 2:24:08 PM PST by StoneWall Brigade (THIS IS THE CALL OF THIS GENERATION. THIS IS AMERICA'S HOUR. SEN. RICK SANTORUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: stevio
Maybe not eloquent, but I understand what he's saying. I get him. Maybe because I am a Criminal Justice graduate. We think a like, I guess.
187 posted on 02/13/2007 2:25:09 PM PST by defconw ( Mrs. Cibco in 74 days! Woo Hoo! WTG COLTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
In reviewing some of the literature, I ran across this:

Beyond the makeup of the presumptive field, three things are identified as working affirmatively in Giuliani’s favor.

He was a highly successful mayor of New York, precisely because he grabbed hold of a monument to liberalism-gone-wild—with a bloated bureaucracy, an institutionalized underclass and a soaring crime rate—and reformed it by applying solidly conservative principles. As Steven Malanga of the Manhattan Institute points out, he put law and order above everything else (instituting a “zero tolerance” approach to petty crime, for instance); tried to unleash the private sector (including abolishing or cutting 23 taxes); and took on vested interests, from teachers’ unions to the welfare bureaucracy. The result was an urban revolution: the murder rate fell by 67%, tourists returned and the private sector boomed.

In fact, Mr Giuliani can boast a solidly conservative record on all sorts of things that matter to the base. He served in the Reagan administration’s Justice Department along with John Roberts, George Bush’s appointee as chief justice of the Supreme Court. He was an aggressive special prosecutor. He trimmed affirmative action, effectively ended racial quotas at the City University of New York and championed school choice.

His second big plus is that most Americans—including most social conservatives—view Mr Giuliani above all as the hero of September 11th 2001. Mr Giuliani became “America’s mayor” that day because his decisiveness contrasted with the administration’s dithering: he rushed downtown as soon as the first airplane hit and took command amid the confusion. Mr Giuliani’s halo has not faded since in the way that Mr Bush’s has.

His third advantage is that the religious right is in the doldrums. Last November, as the socially liberal Arnold Schwarzenegger stormed to re-election in California, social conservatives bombed. Rick Santorum barely scraped 40% of the vote in the Senate race for Pennsylvania, a dreadful result for a two-term senator. And conservatives lost a series of ballot initiatives—on abortion in South Dakota and California, stem-cell research in Missouri and gay marriage in Arizona.

http://www.rudyforpresidentblog.com/
188 posted on 02/13/2007 2:26:20 PM PST by aligncare (Beware the Media-Industrial Complex!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: defconw
We think a like, I guess.

How so?

189 posted on 02/13/2007 2:26:24 PM PST by stevio (Rudy? Don't make me puke.(NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: defconw

nope...he's straight forward...doesn't dance around doing the political two-step.


190 posted on 02/13/2007 2:28:18 PM PST by sofaman ("The American people are tired of liars and people who pretend to be something they're not.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: stevio

Sean is king of the Rudy Infomercial.


191 posted on 02/13/2007 2:28:52 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks (If you don't love Jesus, you can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
spilled my Snapple in my lap...looks like I peed my pants....

this is attractive...

192 posted on 02/13/2007 2:31:43 PM PST by sofaman ("The American people are tired of liars and people who pretend to be something they're not.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: sofaman
Did I or Rudy have anything to do with that? LOL!
193 posted on 02/13/2007 2:33:57 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks (If you don't love Jesus, you can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: aligncare
Unfortunately, nobody can convince them of those facts. They still take credit for voting and NOT voting all of those so called RINOS out of office.

RINOS like Allen, Santorum, Blackwell, Steele, De Voss, and most all incumbent Republican governors were replaced by Democrats.

One of them said he helped vote out a RINO and was happy to say that he had been replaced by a "conservative". He was reluctant to give the party affiliation however, that's because that "conservative" he voted for was a Democrat, by the name of Jim Webb. Imagine that......
194 posted on 02/13/2007 2:34:31 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (" Judge not and thou shalt not be judged")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Just clumsy old me....took the cap off and tilted the bottle. What a genius...now I have wet pants and the crown jewels are freezing..


195 posted on 02/13/2007 2:36:44 PM PST by sofaman ("The American people are tired of liars and people who pretend to be something they're not.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
...as for Giuliani's comment about dealing with pollution: there's that pragmatic nature of his coming to the fore again. In other words: "Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who"...let's get this marriage done -- to paraphrase "The Holy Grail".
196 posted on 02/13/2007 2:37:31 PM PST by aligncare (Beware the Media-Industrial Complex!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: aligncare

I like Rudy.

He IS America's mayor.

He was tough on crime.

But my candidate needs more.

When he said on Fox News that "presidents appoint judges that share their values", I can't trust he will appoint a social conservative.


197 posted on 02/13/2007 2:38:15 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks (If you don't love Jesus, you can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Is Sean always going to call him Guilli-annie?


198 posted on 02/13/2007 2:39:04 PM PST by RichRepublican (Some days you're the windshield--some days you're the bug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: stevio
In my mind there are two issues that matter more then others. The WOT and Judges. His views on them are the same as mine. I would love to see Abortion obliterated. But it is the law of the land and it won't be just magically overturned, but what can be done is modified and codified out of existence, but it won't happen if we keep letting the Democrats in. Some of those older Justices will leave the court during the next Administration and if it's Hillary or her ilk, we will be back to a 4 to 4 with a moderate making the votes.

On the WOT, our laws won't mean anything and personal rights such as bearing arms, free speech, worshiping or not worshiping God will not matter if we lose and they bring that fight over here. Our rights stem from the philosophy of a fundamental freedom of man, the right to free will. If they subjugate us, nothing will save those rights and the Democrats would love to invite them in.

199 posted on 02/13/2007 2:39:09 PM PST by defconw ( Mrs. Cibco in 74 days! Woo Hoo! WTG COLTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: All

The Democratic Party of today would have no room for JFK.


200 posted on 02/13/2007 2:40:01 PM PST by sono (There are only two exit strategies - One is victory, the other defeat - Joe Lieberman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson