Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gilliani is Best GOP Hope in Florida (Beats HRC In Head to Head Matchup for Sunshine State)
Angus Reid Global Monitor ^ | 2.12.07 | Quinnipiac University Polling Institute

Posted on 02/14/2007 7:14:04 AM PST by meg88

Giuliani is Best GOP Hope in Florida February 12, 2007

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Republican Rudy Giuliani holds an early lead in the Sunshine State, according to a poll by the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.

47 per cent of respondents in Florida would vote for the former New York City mayor in the 2008 United States presidential election, while 44 per cent would support Democratic New York senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.

In other match-ups, Rodham Clinton leads Arizona senator John McCain by four points, and holds an 18-point advantage over former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney. McCain leads former North Carolina senator John Edwards by one point, and Illinois senator Barack Obama by two points.

In 2004, Republican George W. Bush carried Florida’s 27 electoral votes, with 52 per cent of all cast ballots. In 2000, weeks of recounts and court injunctions concluded in a 537-vote victory for Bush over Democrat Al Gore. Since 1972, the only Democrats to win the Sunshine State in a presidential election are Jimmy Carter in 1976 and Bill Clinton in 1996.

Bush is ineligible for a third term in office. The next United States presidential election is scheduled for November 2008.

Polling Data

If the 2008 election for President were being held today, and the candidates were (the Democrat) and (the Republican), for whom would you vote?

Rudy Giuliani (R) 47% - 44% Hillary Rodham Clinton (R) John McCain (R) 43% - 47% Hillary Rodham Clinton (R) Mitt Romney (R) 34% - 52% Hillary Rodham Clinton (R) John McCain (R) 43% - 42% John Edwards (R) John McCain (R) 42% - 40% Barack Obama (R)


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: giuliani; hitlary; rudigiuliani; thegaypatriotsfav
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-262 next last

1 posted on 02/14/2007 7:14:07 AM PST by meg88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: meg88

The GOP needs Florida, and it's not going to be easy to get without a Bush on the ticket.


2 posted on 02/14/2007 7:15:13 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

Rudy's wrong on the issues.


3 posted on 02/14/2007 7:18:11 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Even McCain is beating Obama in Florida!


4 posted on 02/14/2007 7:19:26 AM PST by meg88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: meg88

…most of Clintons Policies are very similar to most of mine... Rudy Giuliani 1996

On Abortion I’ve said that I’ll uphold a woman’s right to choice, that I will fund abortions so that a poor woman is not deprived of a right others can exercise… Rudy Giuliani 1989.

On Gun Control This is an industry that is profiting from the suffering of innocent people. What’s worse, its profits rest on a number of illegal and immoral practices. This lawsuit is meant to end the free pass that the gun industry has so long enjoyed... Rudy Giuliani 2000 after filing suit against gun makers and distributors.

On Gun Control We need a federal law that bans all assault weapons, and if in fact you do need a handgun you should be subjected to at least the same restrictions-and really stronger ones-that exist for driving an automobile... Rudy Giuliani 1997

5 posted on 02/14/2007 7:19:44 AM PST by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

This is going to be a Hillary blowout when Rudy's numbers go down and hers get a slight bumb - the natural result of a long R vs. D campaign. They there's the Third Party candidate.

I'm beginning to believe Rudy Giuliani would lose in a landslide.


6 posted on 02/14/2007 7:19:44 AM PST by TitansAFC (Pacifism is not peace; pacifists are not peacemakers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

enough with the friggin' BUSH's already.....no more RINO's


7 posted on 02/14/2007 7:21:00 AM PST by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

"Rudy's wrong on the issues."

If he wants the nomination, he'll reverse his views. Candidates do it all the time. Reference Jack Kemp, Al Gore...


8 posted on 02/14/2007 7:21:53 AM PST by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Rudy's wrong on the issues.

My ding-dong isn't as big as I wish it were, but I'm not going to cut it off.

9 posted on 02/14/2007 7:22:00 AM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

What 3rd party candidate, Nader? He detracts from Hillary


10 posted on 02/14/2007 7:22:22 AM PST by meg88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: meg88
Gilliani is Best GOP Hope in Florida

Wow, two years before the election, and RINO Gilliani is our 'best hope'.

If he's our 'best hope', we're totally screwed!

11 posted on 02/14/2007 7:22:53 AM PST by CrawDaddyCA (Paul/Tancredo 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88
I just don't understand this apparent love fest over Rudy Guliani.
12 posted on 02/14/2007 7:26:12 AM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CrawDaddyCA

Guiliani is not running to be Pope. It's not like he is going to personally go down and open up an abortion clinic. If people insist on being single issue voters, we might as well hand the election over to Hillary.


13 posted on 02/14/2007 7:28:03 AM PST by Merry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: meg88

Rudy is a Sump pump. He wants to be Mayor of the United States.


14 posted on 02/14/2007 7:28:04 AM PST by Candor7 (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

The conservative one that will emerge in the next 6 to 8 months. It'll take between 10 to 15 % of the conservative vote and assure that Hillary gets the White House. I'd be wiling to bet that this has been in the works for a while and much of the funding if traced back far enough would come from Soros and company.

It's too easy and obvious not to do it. Have the media push a candidate for the Republicans that has unpopular views with the far right base then use a 3rd party candidate to peel away the 10-15% you need to win. That's how I'd do it if I were trying to get Hillary into office.


15 posted on 02/14/2007 7:28:20 AM PST by MMcC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: meg88

Who is "Gilliani"?


16 posted on 02/14/2007 7:29:03 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CrawDaddyCA

"If he's our 'best hope', we're totally screwed!"

AGREED...

Are you listening, Fred Thompson?


17 posted on 02/14/2007 7:29:42 AM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: meg88
Grabbing guns will be a big hit in Fla. They don't like guns there. OPPS, I was thinking of Rat big liberal cities in the NE, they hate gun-grabbers in Fla.
18 posted on 02/14/2007 7:30:00 AM PST by Beagle8U (Jimmy Carter changed me into a Republican.......Ronnie made me DAMN proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

As I recall, it wasn't easy to get Florida WITH a Bush on the ticket.


19 posted on 02/14/2007 7:30:45 AM PST by Huck (Soylent Green is People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Rudy vs Hillary is a lose/lose. Wake up and nominate someone else.


20 posted on 02/14/2007 7:30:52 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Merry
It's not like he is going to personally go down and open up an abortion clinic.

Rudy abortion spin point #1 - the president can't directly do anything about abortion.

Wrong. Clinton vetoed two PBA bans. Bush signed on. Rudy opposed them all.

If people insist on being single issue voters, we might as well hand the election over to Hillary.

General Rudy talking point #4 - his opponents are single issue voters.

Oh, if that were only the case. Rudy has at least SIX critical non-conservative positions. He's pro-choice. Pro-gun-control. Pro-amnesty. Pro-gay-rights. Pro-CFR. And now pro-global-warming.

I think I'm gonna compile a list of all the nonsensical Rudy booster talking points and attacks we've seen on FR to date.

21 posted on 02/14/2007 7:31:52 AM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MMcC

I guess it doesn't occur to many in the GOP leadership that the best way to avoid a conservative rift is to NOT push a guy at the far left of the party as the nominee.


22 posted on 02/14/2007 7:33:02 AM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
I just don't understand this apparent love fest over Rudy Guliani.

I can't think of a better example of the power of the media to influence public opinion. They are about to vanquish their worse enemies, religious and social conservatives, and they really don't have to do much to make it happen. Indeed, FReepers will do it for them.

23 posted on 02/14/2007 7:34:37 AM PST by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: meg88

That is true, but many FReepers would prefer Hillary to Rudy, so it seems.


24 posted on 02/14/2007 7:36:07 AM PST by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Fine, work against him in the primaries,

but not supporting him in the general will get you Madame President Hillary.


25 posted on 02/14/2007 7:36:09 AM PST by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MMcC
I'd be wiling to bet that this has been in the works for a while and much of the funding if traced back far enough would come from Soros and company.

If Soros didn't pay for it, it's a sure thing he and his kind are loving it.

26 posted on 02/14/2007 7:36:21 AM PST by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: meg88
---"What 3rd party candidate, Nader? He detracts from Hillary"---

I live in IL, and I am an active member of two grassroots Conservative organizations, one Pro-Family, one Pro-Gun.

There is already an active movement among many of us prepared to back a Third Party candidate if Rudy wins the nod. Names mentioned, some (but not all) of whom have already expressed interest: Alan Keyes, Gary Bauer, Bob Smith, Pat Buchanan,....just to name a few. It will be someone who essentially takes votes away from Rudy Giuliani EXCLUSIVELY.

This is why it's going to have to be someone else. Remember, without Pat Buchanan in 2000 - Bush wouldn't have even needed Florida.
27 posted on 02/14/2007 7:36:23 AM PST by TitansAFC (Pacifism is not peace; pacifists are not peacemakers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Tell that to Mel Martinez at the NRC. Blame Ken Mehlman and Karl Rove for this development. They sat back and let this happen in an effort to disarm the Religious Right and kill the conservative arm of the party.


28 posted on 02/14/2007 7:37:15 AM PST by TommyDale (Who do you trust? An ex-mayor? Or the ranking member of the House Committee on Armed Services?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

My vote is with Mr. Gingrich.


29 posted on 02/14/2007 7:39:35 AM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
I just don't understand this apparent love fest over Rudy Guliani.

Me, I just don't understand this apparent hate fest over Rudy Giuliani.

Do Freepers want the Republican Party to field a candidate capable of beating Hillary Clinton, or don't they?

30 posted on 02/14/2007 7:40:38 AM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: meg88

Gilliani . . . nice twist.

I usually see Guiliani.

Both of which make me think he'll never get elected, since people can't spell his name even when it's staring them in the face from the article.


31 posted on 02/14/2007 7:41:11 AM PST by Xenalyte (Anything is possible when you don't understand how anything happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

Rudi is a great candidate if your goal is to elect anybody with an "R" next to his name. He is a horrible candidate if you want to elect a Conservative.


32 posted on 02/14/2007 7:42:08 AM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Merry
Guiliani is not running to be Pope. It's not like he is going to personally go down and open up an abortion clinic. If people insist on being single issue voters, we might as well hand the election over to Hillary.

Bingo. The President has, at best, a tiny marginal impact on the abortion issue anyway.

The job description of President is not "Abortion-Decider". We've had an outspoken pro-life President for seven years now. Abortions still occur at pretty much the same rate. This should result in headache-inducing cognitive dissonance for the single-issue Freepers.

33 posted on 02/14/2007 7:42:20 AM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

What if Newt throws his hat into the race? Will you support him then


34 posted on 02/14/2007 7:42:28 AM PST by meg88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Rudy abortion spin point #1 - the president can't directly do anything about abortion. Wrong. Clinton vetoed two PBA bans. Bush signed on. Rudy opposed them all.

And those PBA bans passing, or not passing, had a huge impact on whether/how many abortions take place.

Right?

35 posted on 02/14/2007 7:43:16 AM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Fine, work against him in the primaries...

Dude... that's what we're doing. And, by the way, we're getting called traitorous names for doing so...

36 posted on 02/14/2007 7:43:31 AM PST by pgyanke (Gay marriage does to real marriage what counterfeit money does to real money. - Hemogoblin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
This is going to be a Hillary blowout

No doubt about it. I used to use my mother and grandfather as a gauge on elections. Gramps is 93, a union man, democrat. Mom is a liberal dem her entire life and they both voted for Bush and they know what Hillary is all about. They would absolutely NOT vote for her, but it doesn't matter that their eyes have been opened by events, myself and FR---they're automatic votes for Dems has been replaced by...well, I don't want to turn this into an immigration thread so I'll leave it at that.

37 posted on 02/14/2007 7:44:00 AM PST by subterfuge (Today, Tolerance =greatest virtue;Hypocrisy=worst character defect; Discrimination =worst atrocity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

How about a Rudy/Newt ticket?


38 posted on 02/14/2007 7:44:28 AM PST by meg88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Fine, work against him in the primaries, but not supporting him in the general will get you Madame President Hillary.

See, now, you're being too sensible and rational. That's not good enough for some Freepers. They want PURITY.

39 posted on 02/14/2007 7:44:29 AM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: meg88

Only if you flip around the candidates.


40 posted on 02/14/2007 7:45:02 AM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: meg88
Rudy Giuliani (R) 47% - 44% Hillary Rodham Clinton (R) John McCain (R) 43% - 47%

Looks like hillary is a conservative republican now too.

41 posted on 02/14/2007 7:45:19 AM PST by beltfed308 (Democrats :Tough on Taxpayers, Soft on Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan
And those PBA bans passing, or not passing, had a huge impact on whether/how many abortions take place.

That's a new one. Have to add that to the Rudy booster talking point compendium that I'm compiling.

So having shot down the bogus claim that the president can't do anything to stop abortions, you turn around and belittle the fact that fully-formed children are no longer ripped apart.

More depravity from the Rudy boosters.

42 posted on 02/14/2007 7:45:31 AM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
There is already an active movement among many of us prepared to back a Third Party candidate if Rudy wins the nod.

Translation: there is an active movement among many of you to help Hillary Clinton become President if Rudy wins the nod.

43 posted on 02/14/2007 7:45:55 AM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan

Boortz?


44 posted on 02/14/2007 7:46:51 AM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan
That's not good enough for some Freepers. They want PURITY.

Rudy standard talking point #5. His opponents demand purity (this one is a close relative to Rudy talking point #4, that opponents are single-issue voters).

If only Rudy had one or two variances from core conservative values. Sorry, but he has at least six, and the list keeps growing. He's pro-choice. Pro-gun-control. Pro-amnesty. Pro-gay rights. Pro-CFR. And new to the list, pro-global warming.

45 posted on 02/14/2007 7:47:33 AM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MMcC
Easy solution to the problem you propose... support the most-conservative candidate for the GOP! Liberals will crawl over broken glass to vote for the candidate with the (D) by their name. Moving left won't peal off liberals from the (D), it will alienate conservatives and ensure a GOP loss.

The best way to win the fight for the "moderate" swing voter is to have the best and strongest message. If that message is socialism, then we've lost anyway. Having both primary candidates for president espousing socialism to get the middle... means there is no victory to be had.

Why is this so hard for our GOP "leadership" to understand?

46 posted on 02/14/2007 7:47:41 AM PST by pgyanke (Gay marriage does to real marriage what counterfeit money does to real money. - Hemogoblin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

I'd go for that too :)


47 posted on 02/14/2007 7:49:01 AM PST by meg88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan
Translation: there is an active movement among many of you to help Hillary Clinton become President if Rudy wins the nod.

Rudy talking point #11. Being opposed to Rudy means opponents want Hillary to win.

The myopia of the GOP leadership to historical patterns of GOP wins and losses is stunning. If the GOP runs center-right, they win. If they drift leftwards, they lose. Rudy is not a drift leftward, he is a hard turn to port.

48 posted on 02/14/2007 7:49:11 AM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: meg88
Another day, another meaningless name recognition poll.

The silly season started at least six months early this cycle in both parties. People are going to get very tired of it. I know I already am.
49 posted on 02/14/2007 7:49:51 AM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
Dude... that's what we're doing. And, by the way, we're getting called traitorous names for doing so...

That's because many people here are not merely "working against him in the primaries", but threatening/promising that they would vote against him in the general election if he won the nomination.

This is either (1) completely stupid, or (2) a total bluff, a metaphorical "suicide threat", an attempt at a circular, bootstrapped argument against Giuliani in the primaries ("you better not vote for him now because, um, if you do I'll throw the election to Hillary"), invented by people who have no real argument against him.

In either case the people saying this deserve to have their arguments shot down and scorn heaped upon them. Whether the shoe fits you is for you to say.

50 posted on 02/14/2007 7:50:22 AM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-262 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson