Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KS: Area businesses, stores ban concealed weapons despite licenses
Kansas State Collegian ^ | 2/15/07 | Lola Shrimplin

Posted on 02/16/2007 9:17:02 AM PST by kiriath_jearim

Little white signs displaying a crossed-out handgun have been cropping up around Manhattan since last month following the state's adoption of concealed-carry laws. The signs render the properties off-limits to concealed weapons.

The Personal and Family Protection Act, which became law on July 1, 2006, allows for the licensed carrying of concealed weapons but not everywhere.

The first licenses were issued on Jan. 3, 2007. To obtain a license, one can fill out an online application at the Kansas attorney general's Web site, or pick up a paper copy at the sheriff's office in the county where he or she resides.

The licenses are valid for four years, and all license applicants successfully must complete an 8-hour training program approved by the attorney general before receiving the license. The license costs $150 and the cost of instruction, with $40 going to that sheriff's office and the rest to the attorney general's office.

A list of certified instructors is on the Attorney General's Web site.

The act lists several locations where concealed weapons are banned, including city halls, municipal courts and college campuses.

"It's really just a safety issue," said Clancy Holeman, Riley County counselor.

Property owners are allowed to ban concealed weapons on their property by posting signs that meet standards set by the act. The city commission voted last month to put such signs on much of its property, including City Hall and several parks.

Many businesses and organizations in and around Manhattan have put up such signs, including the Riley County Police Department, Manhattan Town Center and the Riley County Historical Museum.

The signs must be eight inches square or larger, with a white background. The depiction of the handgun must be black and the circle and diagonal slash across the image of the handgun should be red.

No text can be placed within the one-inch area surrounding the graphic, according to the regulations.

Sara Van Allen, marketing manager for Manhattan Town Center, said the building is a family environment, and as such, the owners decided to ban concealed weapons in the entire mall.

"It's for the safety of our shoppers," Van Allen said.

If a person is caught carrying a concealed weapon in a building that has a posted weapons ban, police will charge him or her with a class-B misdemeanor which means a fine of $200 to $1,000 and no more than six months imprisonment.

Many businesses do not have the signs up, but some said the signs might be a good idea, especially businesses with a high risk of robberies, said Kelly Unekis, clerk at Dara's Fast Lane.

"It'd probably be a good idea since the law passed," Unekis said.

Rep. Sydney Carlin, D-Manhattan, didn't vote for the concealed carry law but did vote to restrict areas in which concealed weapons could be taken, she said.

House Bill 2528, introduced Wednesday, would prohibit places that have not been specified by state law from banning concealed weapons, Carlin said.

She was unsure whether retail businesses such as Manhattan Town Center would fall under that bill.

"I don't intend to support anything more on concealed carry," Carlin said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 02/16/2007 9:17:05 AM PST by kiriath_jearim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Your house, your rules. If a property owner doesn't want people bringing in guns that's his perogative.


2 posted on 02/16/2007 9:19:10 AM PST by Squawk 8888 (Is human activity causing the warming trend on Mars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

The anti-gun businesses did this when CC 1st passed in MN.
It lasted about 3 months before most took down their "come rob us" signs.


3 posted on 02/16/2007 9:19:26 AM PST by Rakkasan1 ((Illegal immigrants are just undocumented friends you haven't met yet!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
"It's really just a safety issue," said Clancy Holeman, Riley County counselor.

It sure is, and people will be slaughtered someday in one of these *safe concealed carry prhibited zones* because no armed citizens were there to stop it.

4 posted on 02/16/2007 9:19:32 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

"Your house, your rules."

LOL! Dream on. I guess the business owner gets the fine, huh? Nope the city. Whose house is it now?


5 posted on 02/16/2007 9:22:48 AM PST by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

Your house, your rules. If a property owner doesn't want people bringing in guns that's his perogative.



But public parks don't belong to the superintendent, they belong to the PEOPLE.


6 posted on 02/16/2007 9:23:25 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

They'd might as well post "Rob Me" signs.


7 posted on 02/16/2007 9:23:37 AM PST by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Rule of thumb: don't darry where they have metal detectors at the entrance. Other than that, it is your life on the line, so you decide.


8 posted on 02/16/2007 9:24:09 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888
Your house, your rules. If a property owner doesn't want people bringing in guns that's his perogative.

Too bad that same rule doens't apply to bars and restaurants in regards to smoking. On the other hand the city is wrong in regards restricting CC in parks which are open public areas.

9 posted on 02/16/2007 9:24:28 AM PST by beltfed308 (Democrats :Tough on Taxpayers, Soft on Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

If I am going to rob you, with a gun then I would think the

"has a posted weapons ban, police will charge him or her with a class-B misdemeanor which means a fine of $200 to $1,000 and no more than six months imprisonment"

would have little or no bearing on my actions - other than hot having to worry about armed citizens.


10 posted on 02/16/2007 9:24:46 AM PST by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
Too bad the people making these decisions (putting up the no CCW signs) are not held accountable for their decisions.

I'd settle for a news story where their name and image is displayed prominently when a patron of their business is victimized.

11 posted on 02/16/2007 9:25:15 AM PST by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

The 2nd ammendment is slowly being castrated. While a "right to an abortion", nowhere written in the Constitution, is enforced vigorously. I thought only the citizens were allowed to ammend the Constitution. WE ARE the power, not activist judges and leftists who want to rule over us.


12 posted on 02/16/2007 9:25:37 AM PST by rbosque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

You're right. These signs don't last and for a number of reasons. Those of us who carry legally can be pretty firm about not patronizing businesses which post these signs, for one thing, and business owners are often surprised to learn over time just how many of their good customers don't come back because of them. I think it's a temporary, transitional thing where they cater to the fears of the uninformed. Later on, when they take those signs down after the hysteria has passed, no one notices.


13 posted on 02/16/2007 9:26:53 AM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shekkian

"They'd might as well post "Rob Me" signs."

Maybe they'll just put up a sign banning robberies, too.


14 posted on 02/16/2007 9:27:29 AM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

I agree with you.

But it is the right of patrons to not shop there as well.

The person has a CC permit for a reason. Maybe they are being stalked by an old boyfriend, etc. I guess one could leave the weapon in the car. However, that is dangerous, too -- it could get stolen and used in a crime.

I'd prefer to keep the weapon with me because of the danger of it getting into the wrong hands. Chances are good that a car will be broken into.


15 posted on 02/16/2007 9:28:26 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

I was entering a building the other week and saw one of the 'no firearms' stickers. Considering that it was medical building filled with dentist's offices I think it was probably a good idea to keep the patients unarmed.


16 posted on 02/16/2007 9:28:34 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
Don't patronize a business that doesn't trust you. 'Nuff said.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

17 posted on 02/16/2007 9:30:03 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

hmmm .... I wonder if that mall in Utah had those signs.


18 posted on 02/16/2007 9:30:52 AM PST by OkiMusashi (Beware the fury of a patient man. --- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
"Many businesses do not have the signs up, but some said the signs might be a good idea, especially businesses with a high risk of robberies, said Kelly Unekis, clerk at Dara's Fast Lane. "

One of the stupidest statement I have read in a while.....

19 posted on 02/16/2007 9:33:47 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Especially when they see the bill...


20 posted on 02/16/2007 9:34:20 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson